posted on Nov, 12 2007 @ 03:36 PM
I don't get it. Where does it say that it found another planet? I read the abstract, and what I could understand of the conclusion, and it seems
they didn't find anything that would constitute another planet.
On page 73 it says "This study, after searching a majority of "dynamically cold"(low inclination) Classical Kuiper Belt, did not provide any
evidence of larger objects at large distances(>55 AU) which could represent Planet X."
Now granted, I barely understood much of it, so it's very possible I missed something, but from what I read it sounds like they didn't find anything