The Rainbow Conspiracy - what is this picture?, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 37 times


reply posted on 21-11-2007 @ 03:40 AM by zorgon
reply to post by zorgon

In the post I quoted above we see the 'business end' of that big fusion reactor...

Well I came across another document that has a similar sketch...



Your gonna love THIS one... its a 'back at ya NJ' type of document...

Title...
SPACE NUCLEAR POWER AND MAN’S EXTRATERRESTRIAL CIVILIZATION
Date:
LA-UR--83-449
DEC 1983 007561
Source:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Also posted at: FAS.org

What are we talking about here?

Nuclear power in Space...

Here is a list of spacecraft carrying nuclear power...



But the main focus of this document is the Nuclear Power plant for the Moon Base....

Here is a sketch from the paper... It is interesting to note that they felt the need to cover the structures with camouflage



LANL 00248696 PDF



reply posted on 30-11-2007 @ 10:47 PM by downtown436
reply to post by internos


Wow Internos you are the man!!



reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 12:18 AM by goosdawg
reply to post by zorgon


Ack!

They're on to us!

At least the BS and numbers crew haven't been tipped off yet to this thread!

Maybe they only get paid if they debunk/post in a JL forum, eh?

Guess we better enjoy it while it lasts...

At any rate, and, as always, good work Z!

And, of course, internos, too!

[edit on 1-12-2007 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 12:32 AM by Jim_Kraken
reply to post by goosdawg


Uh, maybe they pulled them because they weren't scientifically sound and they were making room for the stuff that was? Kind of like what I wish this forum would do?

Image is everything, people.


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 12:49 AM by goosdawg
reply to post by Jim_Kraken


Hard to say, now that they're gone, eh?

But when they pull'em like that, all of a sudden like, it tends to make one think they may have had something legitimate they didn't want thousands of people constantly accessing, don't you think?

More so than to think they posted something "scientifically un-sound" and just now discovered it, since I imagine whatever they posted originally was, prior to being posted to begin with, vetted by someone who would know the difference, eh?

Imagine that!

BTW, you do follow the links posted, don't you?

It would be a shame, and, frankly, a waste of your time, to come into this forum with your mind made up about things of a speculative and secret nature.

[edit on 1-12-2007 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 02:28 AM by zorgon
Originally posted by Polite American
1.Where can a mere mortal as I access these documents you mentioned above?




The two wormhole tech papers can be found here... (both links still worked last I checked but I saved the files)

The Technology - Airforce Research Projects

As to a list of resources... (this is not complete yet always adding to it)
Resource Database

Patent aArchive, PDF library and video library are almost done just need to create menus with titles and short description


2. From what I remember from the Zorgon/Lear moon basics 101 class a while back, was that HE3 can only come from the moon? if this is correct then is HE3 not the smoking gun that proves your moon theory?


Well we thought so... but even with patents by NASA in 1992 for a "Lunar generated liquid (HE3) cargo ship via a specially outfitted shuttle, seems we aren't getting the point across

There is also HH Schmitt with Intralunar Intra Mars Inc wanting to use Saturn V's for picking it up but that's later

I think the biggest problem is to much related info in to many threads... I will have to make time over the holidays and do a summary



reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 02:31 AM by Jim_Kraken
reply to post by goosdawg


Actually it's weird, because I was a staunch believer in anthropogenic global warming before I started coming here, and then I read an article here which made me do a complete intellectual 180 in that regard, and the rest is history as to why I'm here. And, well, I'm pretty sure that I'm right about the "scientifically unsound" theory because, well, the vast majority of science agrees that those concepts *are* scientifically unsound.


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 02:32 AM by Jim_Kraken
reply to post by rkoftheyr


Nah, bigass magnet for fusion experiments...but now the pro-Lear crowd is just busy propping up their mythology in whatever poorly-reasoned way they can. Don't confuse them with the facts.


reply posted on 3-12-2007 @ 05:40 AM by Havalon
The '60 minutes' program had an Australian report on 'mining Helium3' from the moon tonight. A kilo of this stuff would make the price of gold look like clay! (I do not mean the expence of getting it back here, but the monetary value of that kilo alone.)

No wonder China, Russia, India, Japan, the US, the European Consortium and N Korea are interested in returning to the moon. I just hope they are civilised about it this time. Dispute over soveriegnty can get messy!

It also covered setting up the bases on the moon. At the end of the segment, the reporter asked the question, 'is there any intelligent life up there or on Mars?'
The Australian astronaut in charge of setting up the bases on the moon replied (whilst not looking directly at the reporter but instead averting his eyes to his shoes!)
"No....but that does not mean there is no intelligent life elsewhere in the universe!"

Now, I know a little bit about body language and this guys body screamed that he was not telling the whole truth!
I must apologise for not taping it and downloading it etc, but I am not that tech savvy, plus I have a clunker of a pc,
(one up from the commodore 64 I think! :lol

Way to go guys, the media are starting to get drip fed by the look of it!


Yay! I got it!

sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au...

HARRISON SCHMITT: Those two things - no radioactivity and no waste being produced at all - and also the high efficiency of conversion to electricity, give it a tremendous advantage over any other - practically any other - so-called nuclear fuel source. For example, this is... if you have helium-3 in the same mass as this rock, same weight - say a kilogram - that would be worth, oh, about $14 million in coal, relative to coal.




[edit on 3-12-2007 by Havalon]
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags