Originally posted by Netstriker
John, as I said yesterday, I am a little confused about your opinions.
You first state that no actual planes were used, but only holograms.
Then, you rely on FDR data from the planes as evidence.
Can you please explain your opinions?
Thanks for the post Netstriker. Let me say that the present debate on which seat the hijacker sat in I find ludicrous to the extreme. No hijacker,
which ever seat, he sat could fly the Pentagon profile. No way. Did not happen. Could not happen. But that doesn't keep the uninformed from
That said, the original Holograph theory applied to the WTC only. Then when thevidence rolled in it appeard that it might apply to the Pentagon
Then it appeared like Flight #93 (which didn't crash in Shanksville or anywhere else) was supposed to be the flight that crashed into Building No.
7. But for some reason, either the Holographic Projector broke or whatever, the Holographic Projection of Flight 93 could not be projected into
Buiding No. 7.
Quick action had to be taken and it was decided to simulate a crash in Shanksville of the alleged Flight 93, which, incidentally had already deplaned
its passengers into the NAZA hangar at Cleveland.
An Air Force jet flew over Shanksville, did a couple of noisy barrel rolls (pretending it was the non-existant Flight 93) and somebody set off some
explosives in the field Flight #93 allegedly crashed in.
The hole was 'salted' with a bandana, a passport, a turbine wheel and the first video of the supposed Shanksville rash appeared on TV about 5 pm in
the afternoon about the same time as Buiding No. 7 was controlled demoed. They didn't have their Holographic projection but the bujilding had already
been slated for demo so they just had to 'go for it' and hope the public wouldn't notice the incredible missing Boeing 757 and hijacker pilot
crashing into Bujilding No. 7.
Hey, they've gotton away with it so far. Who can argue with success?
As Craig Ranke continues to unravel the Pentagon crash it appears that several planes may have been used to simulate that crash. I watch Craig's
research with intense interest. So it seems my theory that a holograph was used in the Pentagon crash may be wrong.
But I still hold the holpgraph theory for the World Trade Center towers. In other words a Holographic projection was used to simulate both airplnes
flying into the towers, explosives were then used to simulate the crash and explosion and Diret Energy Weakpons (molecular disassociation) were used
to drop both towers.
As far as the FDR (Flight Data Recorder) evidence I use it only to show that it is impossible that any hijacker was in control of that airplane,
Either that FDR was in the Boeing 757 which overflew the Pentagon under the expert control of Chic Burlingame or a similar mission profile was flown
at an earlier date, also possibloy flown by Burlingame, to simulate the crash on the FDR.
Thanks for the post.