It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Craig will now have some things to add about Farmer's possible motives and probably about the nature of this data - officially controlled and released - so it can have no bearing on the CIT/PentaCon investiigation. For those on that track, please disregard.
"When we took off, we headed north and west and had a beautiful view of the Mall," he said. "I noticed this airplane up and to the left of us, at 10 o'clock. He was descending to our altitude, four miles away or so. That's awful close, so I was surprised he wasn't calling out to us. It was like coming up to an intersection"
source
I sent the radar track image to one of the journalists who reported the E-4B
on air on 9/11. He says it looks too far north.
He remembers it being very large and closer to his position in Lafayette Park.
Also the CNN video of the return pass seems much closer than the first shot
both of which used the same camera and lens.
In order to make the pass by the Capital dome it may have made a tighter
turn taking it back closer to the White House and then gone left to fly due east over the Capital.
None of this appears in the radar data.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by Aim64C
Right on man.
Let us know if you have any evidence as to what happened on 9/11 which was certainly not "any given day".
Speculation doesn't help us much even if you are involved with the military or ATC.
It was NOT an ordinary day..... but it was PRIOR to a civilian airliner or three slamming into various buildings.
Originally posted by Aim64C
Was it, or was it not a normal day prior to the aircraft being hijacked and flown into the WTC?
I made no other stipulations in that assertion.
Likewise - preparations for the launch of that plane began quite a while before the towers were hit. It was a scheduled flight.
You don't scramble cargo aircraft in 20 minutes. You scramble fighters in 5 or less - IF you have them to scramble....
I fail to see anything suspicious.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Craig will now have some things to add about Farmer's possible motives and probably about the nature of this data - officially controlled and released - so it can have no bearing on the CIT/PentaCon investiigation. For those on that track, please disregard.
Not "babysitting"? Nice condescending way to address the entire forum regarding a thread that YOU started. What you really mean is that you have nothing of value to add.
In consideration of the fact that you don't even have any comments on this information why on earth would you dare to tell people what I have to say about it and to disregard me?
Lame dude.
Real lame.
You keep losing credibility by the day and comments like this do nothing to help you gain it back.
Now that you have finally agreed to a recorded phone debate with CIT where you won't be able to pull off your ambiguous neutralization/doubt casting forum techniques I am quite certain that the true Adam Larson (if that is your real name) will be revealed.
Naturally it is foolish to accept the RADES data as valid without scrutiny, investigation, and corroboration but the information already exists to fatally contradict it so not much legwork on our end was necessary this time.
The primary things that prove the RADES data fraudulent right off the bat are......
1) The C-130 pilot Steve O'Brien's accounts.
(I'll go over a summary here but most of these details are covered in this thread that CL has dutifully ignored.)
2) The new charter boat captain witness who was on the Potomac River we have obtained on our research trip last week who establishes the true approach of the plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon.
3) The footage and eyewitness reports of where the E4B actually flew. The E4B research specialist Pinnacle on the Pilots for Truth forum has the goods on this so I will cite the contradiction he mentions.
So the true flight path of all 3 of the primary planes in this saga prove the recently released RADES data fraudulent.
The C-130 pilot Lt. Col. Steve O'Brien's account is very compelling since he was actually in the airspace.
He has been very explicit in regards to the details of where he flew and it's clear that the perpetrators had no problem throwing him under the bus by completely rewriting history with the release of this RADES data (as well as the NTSB data).
It was important for the perpetrators to make it seem like O'Brien...
A. Would have seen the impact
B. Could have "shadowed" the AA jet and veered off over the Pentagon at the last moment as we have heard ambiguously and even directly from some very suspect witnesses.
Although O'Brien never claimed he did either of these things an ambiguous picture was deliberately painted by the media implying both because it served as an effective cover for the flyover.
Well the RADES data takes all the ambiguity out of this deception and holds the government to their word and confirmed our suspicions that this was their intent since day one. The fact that we have documented all of O'Brien's statements and had direct contact with him helps prove this fatal contradiction.