posted on Nov, 12 2007 @ 03:48 PM
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
A leading sasquatch researcher is someone who actually furthers the data field and knowledge on the subject and is fairly widely known and respected
for such accolades. Someone who actually goes out into the field and investigates, gathers samples and evidence, has that evidence analyzed,
I am fairly well known among the guys in my league. I go out on a field and make catches, tackles and I am pretty respected for what I do too. But
would never consider myself a leading player in the game. But then again I guess thats because Football exists. Everyone has seen football.
Everyone knows who the leading players are in football.
I just find it hard to be a leader in Sasquatch research, without ever disecting, or studying one in real life. I know astronomers have never been to
Mars, but can be called leading researchers of Mars. Thats because you can see it with a telescope, take readings using instruments. Can you see
Sasquatch with a telescope? Finding some hair and blood does not mean anything unless you can compare it to hair and blood of an actual documented
The idea of their being a leader in a field of study, where what you study can not be proven to exists just perplexes me. The same goes for the term
leading UFOlogist, leading Loch Ness Monster researcher.
Not trying to derail the thread, I just don;t like anyone being called the leading researcher in............ nothing.
OK, I will stop with my annyoing little diatribes and let you guys get back to talking about big foot.