posted on Nov, 8 2007 @ 11:53 AM
reply to post by rocksarerocks
I try to explane:
1) That's a closeup and the jpeg artifact HAS BEEN REMOVED ALMOST TOTALLY, so isn't a valid example
2) If you post a picture OUT of its origional contest, and you add "Alien cities on Mars" you make the people think that someone claimed it, and
that someone, of course, isn't me, since the anomaly in question, as you can see, is an apparent geyser, so totally different argument
3) Since you're quoting a picture posted by ME, i don't see why you don't post at least the link to the original post:
These are the only reason of my post. A closeup out of contest is meningless, the caption was deceiving by himself, and there is NOT jpeg artifact in
that pic: there is blur, of course, but that's another question. Absolutely no offence intended, but a necessary clarification.
By the way, since i don't know about you, i don't blame you to ignore the facts.
Since i NEVER ignore the facts, it would be appreciated if you'd refrain from blaming the people randomly.
top= jpeg artifact almost absent
bottom = jpeg artifacts
[edit on 8/11/2007 by internos]