This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


Jaxa.jp: Incredible High Definition Video of the Moon Taken by a Japanese Spacecraft


<<  3    4    5    6  >>



reply posted on 18-11-2007 @ 06:05 AM by NGC2736


reply to post by internos



Thank you for explaining just how much difference it makes to have this new view. Excellent work. Now even a dummy like me can appreciate the fact that we ought to see the moon's surface and composition like never before.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2007 @ 08:45 AM by Solarskye


Amazing photo's and comparisons Interno's Soon our technology will give us the human eye view of our moon, planets and stars. Thanks for all the information. I love seeing and learning about outerspace and this forum is an awesome place to learn.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2007 @ 08:01 PM by cdrn



Originally posted by Solarskye
... and this forum is an awesome place to learn.


No, it's not. Pick up a book, such as one by Carl Sagan. Watch a well-made documentary. Google up "Astronomy Picture of the Day". Learning by reading the stuff here will give you a ridiculously distorted view of everything.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2007 @ 10:05 PM by NGC2736



Originally posted by cdrn

Originally posted by Solarskye
... and this forum is an awesome place to learn.


No, it's not. Pick up a book, such as one by Carl Sagan. Watch a well-made documentary. Google up "Astronomy Picture of the Day". Learning by reading the stuff here will give you a ridiculously distorted view of everything.


And just what has been distorted in this piece? And why are you so certain that there are less distortions in these more mainstream sources?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2007 @ 10:53 PM by Solarskye


reply to post by cdrn



I read all the time but I was just commenting on this forum and the great work and time spent in high definition videos taken by the Jaxa satellite pics and interno's contribution to this thread. He's done a great job and I've learned from it. Carl Sagan is an awesome man who's played a leading role in Nasa and it's space program and planetary science.
I've read the Dragons of Eden along with Cosmo's. It's sad that he's no longer with us today and I can still hear the waterfall in the background. Carl is dearly missed by me and probably thousands of space dreamers.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-11-2007 @ 05:19 AM by internos


First of all, i think that everyone has something to teach, and that everyone has much to learn.
I like to learn and i'm neither able nor interested to teach, but i disagree with people who tells the other people what to read and what to think: if i'm correct, ATS encourages sharing of opinions/data/knowledges in a civil manner, this is NOT Harvard.
- Some post adds contents to the discussion.
- Some posts adds NOTHING to the discussion.
- Some post even SUBTRACTS contents from the discussion.
Now, in general, there's much stuff here that is questionable, some stuff could even be called garbage, buth there are members who adds FIRST QUALITY contents, much good stuff including FIRST HAND SOURCES and REFERENCES: the reader decides what is worthy to be read, as in all the civil countries.
Since everyone has a brain, to tell the others how to think and what to read/watch/believe is USELESS to say the least, IMO.


[edit on 19/11/2007 by internos]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-11-2007 @ 12:01 PM by cdrn


I agree fully that there are some members who know what they are saying. The problem, however, is this: how do you know how to discriminate between useful and useless (or flat out incorrect) information if you don't know much about the material in the first place?

To put it in another way: who is more likely to believe John Lear, a planetary scientist or someone without a good science background?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-11-2007 @ 01:20 PM by internos



Originally posted by cdrn
I agree fully that there are some members who know what they are saying. The problem, however, is this: how do you know how to discriminate between useful and useless (or flat out incorrect) information if you don't know much about the material in the first place?

To put it in another way: who is more likely to believe John Lear, a planetary scientist or someone without a good science background?

I have to state beforehand that i dislike to talk about people who's not discussing in the thread, so i talk about the topic in general:
you have made an EXCELLENT point IMHO.
For example: how many people gets CRAZY after reading certain books written by pseudo-researchers? Take a look at the shape-shifting craze...
..i mean ... it started from somewhere...and of course NOT from an university
And yes, not only useless/incorrect: it could be DANGEROUS to take as truth whatever we read. And sadly, not all have the ability to distinguish what is knowledge and what is garbage: but fortunately i've seen that here on ATS, at least frequently, when someone makes otrageous claimings, there's always someone who points it out: asking evidences supporting his/her claimings etcetera.
This is the ideal behaviour in order to deny ignorance IMHO.
I've appreciated your last comment: a star for you.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-11-2007 @ 09:50 PM by NGC2736


Learning is not for the lazy, or the feint of heart. Often one must hack their way through a jungle of distortion and ego driven drivel to reach the true oracles of wisdom. But it isn't a worthless trip, not only for what will be learned in the end, but the craft of the trail that will serve in good stead for future exploration into the unknown.

Sadly, most schools teach facts, not the art of discovering facts.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  3    4    5    6  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.093 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread