This topic is in the Survival discussion forum.  (rss)


Civil War II: The Coming Breakup of America


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 15-1-2008 @ 03:18 AM by tellmeliesgov


I don't think that the people will be fighting there own military but the UN and other hired gun's and other brain washed Americans trying to make a name for there self just to move up



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 09:55 AM by Question



Originally posted by CANADIAN-guerilla
i have this in PDF format
a pretty good read
some of this is already showing up in current news

all i can say is
i'm glad i'm in Canada


You have this in PDF??? any chance I can ask you for a copy? I'd be very interested in reading this, especially the survival tips.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 12:43 PM by admriker444


Honestly there is no need for open armed conflict. Look at how the communist / dictator type goverments were overthrown in eastern Europe. No violence was needed. The people simply massed in the city center and literally stopped everything until their demands were met.

In Poland they stopped going to work and blocked all roads into the capitol and protested for weeks on end.

All we need to do is simply stop playing their game and cooperating within their system.

Imagine if say 5 million americans went to Washington DC and jammed up all the roads and refused to leave until the Constitution was restored. The police couldnt possibly do anything to that amount of people.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2008 @ 12:37 PM by HYRYSC


admriker444, very good point. Sometimes armed conflict is just a minority seeking to have a majority voice.

However, I sincerely wonder if a similar thing could ever happen in the US.

It seems that the tendency (whether planned or natural remains to be seen) is for Americans to isolate themselves. We seem to be crowded together in cities for the most part, or within a comfortable drive of them, but seek to isolate ourselves from most interaction with our neighbors etc. We have ipods so we don't have to talk to people on the subway or the train or the sidewalk. We have movies delivered right to our house so we don't have to a crowded theater to see them. We watch on the news people who just want to be left alone get burned alive in Waco, or shot on Ruby Ridge and then are told that they were terrorist, or aggressors or whatever the scary label is at the time. We wag our heads and wonder what the world is coming to, but we seldom assemble ourselves together in protest and when we do see people protesting, the way it is portrayed is that there are a couple of malcontent, extremists making all the noise and all they want is to cause trouble.

A good man once said, "For evil men to rise, good men need to simply do nothing."



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2008 @ 01:22 PM by 1ShotDeal


Perhaps some here are not old enough to remember the 60's in America, but alot of us are.
Our history is full of stories of civil disobediance when attempting to change how our society is governed or " justice" is dispensed.
To go back further, research " the bonus army" after WW1.
In that instance hundreds of thousands of veterans descended on Washington to protest inequities in how WW1 vets were being treated. They were met with violence in which the U S Army moved in and opened fire.
In the 60's many non violent demonstrations for civil rights were met with violence.
Many student " sit ins" to protest the war in Vietnam were met with violence, and in one case the National guard opened fire on unarmed protesters at Kent State University.
If anything our government is even more repressive than it was in the past.
If anything the general public is even more angry than they were back then.
In those past instances there were minorities protesting and seeking to bring about change.
What will it be like today when it's the majority that is angered by injustice and armed ?
What will be the end result when our government now has " legal" recourse to address dissent with violence simply by portraying any protest as a subversive uprising?
I fear any march in mass numbers on Washington would be met with force which will be answerd with force.
As has been pointed out, the goverment has superior technology for wageing war to put down an insurection.
What has been overlooked is the millions of war veterans now in the public who remember thier skills and will resort to thier experience and training if they are forced to.
The only thing worse than an active duty machine gunner following orders, is that same 50 cal. operated by a vet with a vengence.
One ,perhaps overlooked, by product of the draft is a huge population of vets in civilian life most of which have felt the sting of an ungreatful goverment.
Payback's a ....... !

[edit on 18-1-2008 by 1ShotDeal]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 06:40 PM by CyberSEAL



Originally posted by Roper
What in the world are you talking about? Bush is not running for office! Theses reports you refer to are just loony-toon. How can anyone believe this? I know in the age of the "net" that anyone can say anything but you don't need to believe it!



lol...thank you.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.064 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread