I updated some of the details on the Electric Sun Model on
www.plasma-universe.com... which gives some really good
evidence for a remotely powered sun.
They have a few good pictures of birkeland current structures in the corona, and filaments that look just like electrical currents, travelling into
and out of the sun in the solar wind.
The flare appears twisted just like the birkeland currents you sometimes see in common plasma balls, like these;
The novelty plasma ball demonstrates many of the properties of plasma that can be seen in the Sun, in nebulae, and in galaxies. Since the sun is
99.999% plasma, applying these recent experiments to the sun is a logical step.
Blaise Frazier's beautiful photo of the spherical electrode in the centre of a plasma ball shows a blue filamentary streamer as it wavers during the
8-second exposure. Thousands of volts of electricity ionize the gas in the globe, ripping electrons from molecules and atoms. As electrons recombine
with the ions, the gas gives off light. The colors depend on the kind of gas filling the globe.
This plasma ball illustrates some of the fundamental characteristics of plasma. Sometimes called a plasma cable, or plasma rope, the filament is the
result of electrons and ions flowing through the plasma (i.e., an electric current). The current generates a magnetic field that surrounds the
filament like hoops around a beer barrel. The magnetic field pinches the current and keeps it collimated (or wire-like).
Also, as has been shown well earlier by other people on this thread, the work of Kristian Birkeland successfully showed the equatorial plasma torus
seen on the sun using an electrical high voltage mechanism. Birkeland was nominated for the Nobel Prize no less than seven times; even though the
implictaions of his work on how the sun really functions is continually ignored by mainstream astronomy today.
His experiment;
Looks like a pretty good fit to me. A lot of birkelands work can be seen on havard uni's website;
-adsabs.harvard.edu...
-adsabs.harvard.edu...
-adsabs.harvard.edu...
-adsabs.harvard.edu...
Instead of astonomers being excited about the prospect of testing structures in space in the laboratory, they have been overwhelmingly negative of
these findings. Probably because it brings into question a lot of their original assumptions about gravity, and the fuel source of the sun, which they
can not back up with any good reasons.
Currently there is no explanation as to why gravity can cause these structures, or why the corona is even there in the first place. They are all
obviously an electrical phenomenon. The sun is likely not powered from its core, but externally from the galaxy.
[edit on 16-11-2007 by ZeuZZ]
Anyway, thats the
more specualtive side of it, its the science that i really like as it has a lot of academic support, even if mainstream astronomers choose to
completely ignore them. 
