Originally posted by totalvigilance
Maybe the nuclear model is wrong but I'm not buying the electrical model.
A lengthy refutation can be found here:www.tim-thompson.com...
Here's a reply to Tim Thompson, This has been around for a couple of years I think, still waiting for his response.
Tim Thompson - A Rebuttal
As for the nuclear model making many predictions, well not really. But their have been many detailed observations and measurements that have been
made. It's is only a matter of perspective, All of the data is still valid and is not in question. It all lends support to the electric model if you
change your point of view.
I think the most convincing evidence for me is Kristian Birkeland Terella experiments. Many of the solar phenomena are replicated in his experiments
including the corona, plasma torus, sunspots, and the so called magnetic reconnection which is better described as a filamental pinch in plasma
physics.
More at the link, This was published in 1908, Mr Birkeland first proposed that the aurora was an electrical effect, the scientific community scoffed
at him, It took some 70 odd years and many many verifications before it was finally accepted.
www.catastrophism.com...
I've been researching this for about six months on and off, before I knew very little about the sun. I'm a little bit wiser now, some of the data is
way out of my league, but common sense supports the electric model and it's backed up by some hundred year old experiments.
The OP is spot on, the influx of charged ions into the solar system is giving the sun some extra kick. The particles are flowing in because of the way
the magnetic feilds are currently aligned. This can explain IMO, the increase in noctilucent clouds, the warming of the other planets and moons
including Earth, the intense auroral activity of Jupiter and Saturn and may even offer an explanation to the sudden flare up of comet Holmes (although
that may be a reach, only my thoughts).
The Universe is electric folks, I bet Tesla would agree.