Originally posted by totalvigilance
Furthermore, has RP significantly changed his positions since 2006? My money says no.
This is exactly what we admire about Dr. Paul. Not the lies you are apparently quite used to hearing. Actually, since about 1988. Not 2006.
Alright, I admit Hillary is downright evil, a crook, so on and so forth, but at least she doesn't support extreme reactionary viewpoints
that could plunge the country into chaos.
Well. It's good to hear that you "admit Hillary is downright evil, a crook"... etc.
But, please explain how the Constitution contains "extreme reactionary viewpoints"?
Especially in view of the "Rule By Fiat" that Queen Hillbillary espouses.
Are you saying that a return to the kind of principles outlined in the Constitution are "extreme reactionary viewpoints" ?
Au contraire, mon amie.
I would say that the Rule By Fiat that Queen Hillbillary has already shown a propensity for ( can you say secret Nationalized Healthcare meetings in
violation of the Sunshine Laws by an Attorney?) is far more extreme and reactionary than a return to the Constitution. I would also say she is a
felon.
I would rather have a crook in office who's gonna skim a couple billion off the top rather than a misguided ideologue who's going to wreck
the works.
America’s revolutionaries Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, et al, also kind of "wrecked the works" don't you think?
Sounds a bit like you like the status quo (Fiat rule, Big gov intrusiveness, totalitarianism, shrinking liberties, 1984 scenario, etc ) and more
politicians like hillbillary. All quite acceptable to you, no?
You've come to the right place, my friend...