New submission to UN to effectively Ban Organized Religion

yes yes... logical resolution.

To promote freedom we will arrest anyone who wears a religious symbol. To promote freedom we will raid any building and arrest participants of any ceremony WE deem religious if it involves more than three people.

The "resolution" itself makes no sense. Even someone like me, who has a rather uh... dismissive opinion of the UN understands that this is not real, and even if someone proposed it, it would never gain even one vote.

Ok Seekerof, Bob88, Neo, whomever else....I want to know why the UN is hated so much by the righ...I mean, certain people in the US.
What do you propose we do with the UN? Should there be something to replace it or should it just be every nation to itself? What will give the international community as a whole a voice and a place to work out problems?

[Edited on 1/30/2004 by Flinx]

Anyone who says that all of man's problems are due to organized religion is a damn idiot.

Man's problems stem from man's nature, religion or not.

So quite with the Bull #. If you don't like it fine, sleep in on sunday.

Otherwise, being extremely selective about history must surely gain you respect and credit in the free thinker department. You should try it..... wait a minute.

hahaha

Yes, I would also like to see the U.S. pull out of the U.N..

But this supposed proposal looks like a crock of shyte. Just look at the wording. Using words like 'scourge' would never be tolerated in an official proposal. Do you think the Islamist states would go for an idea like this?

Also, look at the site where this info is coming from. Very questionable.

ISLAM seems to be the poblem relgion.

Hijacking, suicde bombings, bombings of building, killing and using none muslims and cilivians as means of get their way.

But no, lets take out all the relgions, because of this to make it look fair.

It's like sept 11, lets strip everyone of their rights to make it look fair..

Why didn't they just strip all the arabs and muslims in their country of rights.

The likely hood of a terrist cell is most likely a muslim. Since terroisism seems from ISLAM.

It's really about the NWO using ISLAM and Terroists as means to strip everyone of their rights. To create their NWO order.


Islam is AIDING the antichrist but making it possible for teh anti-christ weave into power.

Sounds crazy doesn't it

Originally posted by Thinker


Sounds crazy doesn't it

yeh. Shut the # up .

I just seen the NEWS today, calling for arabs to capture israelie soilder's in order to get israel to release prisoners.

See how a muslims look upon jews and all order people as sub class, that has no value.

a muslims would hijack a plane from greenland and use those lives are so polictial bargain. Again looking at anyone that is not a mulsim as SUB class

Muslims use their immoral nature as kinda like bargining tool. Its like a robber going into a bank and point a gun to a child and saying give me all your money or i will kill you. See how the robber cares nothing for other people but himself. It's the same with muslims, it cares not if they kill non muslims as long it's not themselves their people, the muslims.

The world has already tried "banning religion," and it proved for all time after millions perished, and continue to perish, that if you think religion is the problem try "no religion." Obviously your proposal for a kind of official atheism would ban also atheism itself, since it is a religion focused upon the non existence of a Supreme being. There is no end to the abuse you propose here, since people would fall into the same trap, as your proposal itself is a "religion," the enforced religion of non-religion. Sounds as bad or worse than the inquisition to me.

You also must understand to

Relgion = way of life.

You could call the average american = in secular religion.

Meaning his way of life, is the standard of the soceity. In a way, lives on the standard.

Like you could call

RNB trend , their dress sense, their attituded as a relgion, run around with guns, drive by shootings. Since they act in certain manner.

Muslims trend, dress to cover up, rape a few none mulsims, blow up a few planes, commit a few sucide attacks, fly a few planes into buldings, hijacking, ransom ect.

There are people who mix relgions together,

Islam and the RND relgion makes wonders.

Then you have homosexuality relgion.

Then you have the biseuxaL relgion

The femnazi relgion.



It's all about way, its about reaction, its about what you do, what you will you not do.

It about choice.

The truth way, makes all the right choices

Originally posted by Thinker
You also must understand to





Muslims trend, dress to cover up, rape a few none mulsims, blow up a few planes, commit a few sucide attacks, fly a few planes into buldings, hijacking, ransom ect.

Your ignorant generalizations about an entire religion really offend me "Thinker". Yeh sure, extremist Muslims have done these things, but so have people from every different race and religion. Evil plagues every Religion, be it the child molesting bishops in America or the suicide bombers in Isreal.

Even if someone submitted this for something, it would never be approved there..

originally posted by: lostinspace
January 27, 2004

Proposed UN Resolution Would Effectively Ban Religion
A draft resolution which aims to secure global peace and stability at
the expense of organized religion is today being submitted to the United
Nations in New York.

A draft resolution which aims to
secure global peace and stability at the expense of organized religion is
today being submitted to the United Nations in New York.
Freedom from Religion | Proposed UN Resolution / Charter Amendment |
Version 1.1

WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS HEREBY VOW

* to save succeeding generations from the scourge of organized religion,
a folly which has brought untold sorrow to mankind through the division,
hatred and conflict it engenders, and

* to reaffirm an individual's right to freedom of belief, freedom of
conscience and freedom of prayer, and

* to establish conditions under which these freedoms can be privately
exercised.

AND FOR THESE ENDS WE UNDERTAKE

1. To outlaw, with immediate effect, the public expression of religious
beliefs, including the use of symbols, clothing or markings which are
synonymous with any currently or previously existing religions.

2. To outlaw, with immediate effect, public acts of worship or religious
declaration.

3. To outlaw, with immediate effect, private gatherings of three or more
people for the purposes of engaging in acts of worship or religious
services.

4. To outlaw, with immediate effect, the publication of books, literature
or articles which seek to promote religious beliefs or encourage
adherence to religious doctrine.

5. To outlaw, after a period of amnesty, the personal ownership of books
or materials which seek to promote religious beliefs or encourage
adherence to religious doctrine. (Books of academic or social interest
will be made freely available to schools, universities and public
libraries).

6. To outlaw, with immediate effect, the celebration of religiously
significant dates.

7. To begin, with immediate effect, the destruction or reassignment of
predominantly religious buildings, such as churches, mosques and temples

www.formulism.org...

The originator of the proposal said, "Unfortunately, I suspect it will require an act of religious terrorism that kills millions before they'd consider using it. "

Dude, you're going to freak a bunch of people out reanimating a 10 year old threa!