A few pics that you guys might be ineterested in.

Too often it seems as though links to images or videos are removed!
I cannot view half of the content posted here, nonetheless I have probably seen them already, I just think its annoying when they are removed.

Same deal happened with the Chemtrail vids, I mean if you want people to believe it isn't true, don't go deleting the links.

Peace.

The "tear" in the photo can't be a tear. It wouldn't "curl" like it does, it would fold. There is no fold where the the pictures weight (and possibly the scanners lids weight as well) pushes it down on the clear scanner plate. If the tear was indeed holding up the weight of the picture, it would distort it and light from the scanner would bleed from the edges around the perimeter of the photo.
It also appears to be a floating chunk of "skin" metal. The edges of the anomaly seem to be ripped, metal with a "painted" surface on the inside.

Truely odd, in my book.

I can admit to some of the blue dots and red streaks are, indeed, lights reflected from the inside of the spacecraft's portal window. But that one floater has me intrigued.
Cuhail

First, Thank You!
I U2U'd you

Can you get back to me? I had some questions.

Some of the work I did when contracting to NASA are in their visual database, but I have never seen these. Would love to find your source. I will send you my email U2U.

Thanks again.

ZG

Almost everything has disappeared now, probably because that user of that machine, located at the Lynchburg College and that I suppose is called Kipp Teague, uses it as a digital deposit.

Maybe this would be a good opportunity to present ATS to him (if he is not already a member... ) and ask him to come here and talk about those Moon photos, someone who has created the Apollo Project Archive must have seen many, many Moon photos.

But I could be wrong.

[edit on 5/11/2007 by ArMaP]

This is very interesting............There was a ton of Apollo pics yesterday and some extremely interesting ones besides the tear pic still there. Lucky for us I save a few, the most interesting one the egg shaped craft with the blue light I didn't because it may have been part of the ship so I deleted it to deny ignorance

Dome




i240.photobucket.com...

Look past the dome lower right you see a bright spot kinda small. Save to your CPU and zoom looks square to me. Power source? Who knows.

Antenna

i240.photobucket.com...

A hair on the film or something else?

Get it soon before these links disappear like the others. I wish you all could have seen them they where awesome!

I saved a bunch of them that I found interesting:



















(^ My favorite)























I didn't want to "point out" what I saw to be interesting in these photos on purpose.

Enjoy.

These two images are really, really disturbing. In the first one, I turned up the brightness by 100 and cropped it a bit...but other than that, it's unchanged.

AS09-19-2957HR:



AS09-20-3083HR:



I don't even know what to make of these, to be honest.

reply to post by Keebie

---

You're looking at the picture of the "dome" upside down. If you look at it turned the other way, the "dome's" true nature is revealed -- it's just a crater. The phot was probably shot from "under" the Moon, looking up.

Here is that same photo turned 180 degrees:


or
Link to Photo


And that thing that looks like a hair is probably just that -- a hair or some other thin filament that got stuck to the photographic paper at the time this photo was developed.

Anyone care to offer an explanation for the ones that I re-posted? I've considered a lot of possibilities, but I haven't been able to figure out what they could realistically be.

reply to post by Majal

---

in all seriousness, the first one just looks like an under-exposed pic at a funkadelic concert. looks like a guy playing a keyboard or a guitar on a stage.

the second pic looks normal, with dust / scratch / scribble.

reply to post by Majal

---

1st shot, reaction control thrusters in the dark.

Reference the multiple shots of the reaction control thrusters in the illuminated shots posted by Donoso just prior to yours, in fact, Donoso has the same shot, uncropped.





I rotated the second pic around to show what I'm talking about.

Don't have a clue what the "lens flare" thing is though.

Maybe a reflection of the light source for the shot, on the inside surface of the viewport?

---

reply to post by Donoso

---

I think this might be a shot of Apollo 13's Command/Service Modules from the LEM, notice all the "stuff" hanging out the side?

Did they have remote-controlled cameras on the LEM?

Compare that to this:

(Careful, hi-rez version)



Notice how the "stuff" sticking out would kind of line up, allowing for the fact the Command Module has been disengaged from the Service Module in the "official" b/w pic.

Just as I was ready to post this last night with supporting links and stuff I had a power surge/transitory outage and I lost everything.

Everything except the b/w pic already loaded into my photobucket account though!

(Power supply's been kind of weird around here since the fires...I live in SoCal, BTW.)

Pretty cool shots though, whatever they are. Thanks, y'all




[edit on 6-11-2007 by goosdawg]

And if I posted some pictures of say Yellowstone next to your's from Iran, would you know the difference between them?

We look at their's and say how beautiful.

They look at ours and think this would be a nice place to bomb.

reply to post by phineasJwhoopie

---

Pssst! Don't look now, but I think that you posted your answer in the wrong thread.

Yup, you're right about what it actually is. I had a feeling that there was a realistic explanation for it, because it was a little bit too close to the cameraman to be anything strange.

Donoso and I were actually talking about the pictures on AIM well before either one of us posted here. He doesn't have access to Photoshop at the moment, so I re-posted some cropped and brightened versions of the most perplexing images.

With that said, I still have no idea what to make of the second one. It couldn't possibly be a hair on the lens or anything like that, because it doesn't resemble the hairs that show up in many of the other images. It's flat out weird.

[edit on 8-11-2007 by Majal]