It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

People say Bush should not apologize

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2004 @ 09:52 PM
link   
Yeah, basically they granted him another Vietnam scenario.
Alot of good that act did, eh?



posted on Feb, 5 2004 @ 10:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Satyr
Yeah, basically they granted him another Vietnam scenario.
Alot of good that act did, eh?


Guess they didn't take into account that congress would have presidents flat out lying in order to get the power to do so.



posted on Feb, 5 2004 @ 11:03 PM
link   
Show the lie.

Let me give you a scenerio.

Mr. A is a CEO, and B and C are his "go to" info guys.

Mr. A knows that taking over Company Ion should be done because there are 120,000 jobs withthis company but that top Ion guys have been thought to be involved in criminal activity.

He asks "Do they have illegal material?" B and C say that it is likely but not 100%. He knows that outside information mostly confirms B and C's findings although there is some info the suggests otherwise. He asks "What is your professional opinion no the material from all the information gathered?" They say "Yes, they do have illegal material."

So he takes over the company under the pretense that they have been involved in illegal activity.

Upon aquasition (sp) they find that the illegal activity was thought to be happening was superfitial and misleading because although there is paperwork to confirm it, there is no product. They were very corrupt projects.

Did they Lie Lie Lie? No, mislead maybe. Made a mistake yes.

I know that this is not the best analogy, but it proves a point.

There are many more forces at work than that which we know about.

How if Clinton did not know the intel was faulty, was Bush supposed to suddenly know? Because we had troops onsite to check like we do now?



posted on Feb, 6 2004 @ 08:56 AM
link   
Shoktek: Great info. Bush pushed for more power to be able to unilaterally declare war and he based it on the fact that "9-11 changed everything".

A probe of the intelligence-gathering process is really important, but it doesn't address the question of how and WHY the decision was made to go to war. And so fast.

The conclusion that war was the only necessary and prudent course of action was made in the White House, not at Langley and not at Quantico. The White House must answer to it.



posted on Feb, 6 2004 @ 09:40 AM
link   
Just a thought that Churchill is a personal hero for GWB:

www.google.com...


Ra

posted on Feb, 7 2004 @ 12:27 PM
link   
I do expect shrub, cheney, and rumsfeld to stand trial and serve long jail terms when covicted for ubstruction of justice, falsification of information leading to the deaths of 600+ American soldiers and misappropriation of US tax payer funds for personal gain and profit.

Let the bastard appologize from a Leavenworth jailcell.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join