posted on Nov, 2 2007 @ 07:05 PM
Been a long time since I commented on a John Lear thread. For a couple of reasons, most importantly the last time I was post banned for a few days,
but also because Lear completely avoids confrontation... which in my personal opinion proves he is disingenuous.
Now, but quite honeslt if ANYONE said half the things HE says they would be banned for hoaxing.
John Lear, son of the man who made the Lear Jet. Perhaps that gave him the idea that he is important and that people would listen to him, who
knows.
The thing is, he has all these contacts, NSA, NASA, CIA, HLS, ect, ect, ect .. very connected. But its is claims that give him away.
For instance.
soul collector on the moon. What a joke. Any pics? No. None. He has pics of rock formations he claims are mines, but to lazy apparently to
capture the giant soul collector.
Ask him for proof... he insults you. Ask him to back up a claim, he deems you ignorant.
As I said, if I claimed to know sources to prove a giant soul collector (among many things) without proof I would be banned for a hoax.
I thought ATS denied ignorance, not embrace it.. so I ask, under what reasoning do his devout followers believe such bogas information?
And more importantly
Why, John Lear, do you not answer critics instead of ignoring or insulting your critics?
[edit on 11/2/2007 by Rockpuck]
admin edit: removed childish name calling
[edit on 11-3-2007 by Springer]