Ever heard of plasma cosmology? It is not your typical crackpot science theory, its backed up by a vast amount of underground peer reviewed papers
that are constantly overlooked by modern astronomers. This thread is intended for academics, as the science of this issue gets quite complex, but the
basic priciples of it are easy to understand. It has drastic implications for the way that scientists view space and also has big implications for the
cause of global warming. There is so much material on this i'm not quite sure where to begin, but i'll try to summarize what it all means.
Put simply Plasma Cosmology uses the recently tested characteristics of plasma's in the laboratory and applies them to what is in space. It sounds
really simple, but mainstream astronomers absolutely hate this idea, as it contradicts the core assumptions of modern gravity based astronomy (namely
the Big Bang, Inflation, Dark Matter, Dark energy, Lambda CDM theory, and many more of modern astronomies hypothetical entities).
There are some very basic facts that clearly demonstrate that plasma cosmology is a better theory than the current scientific understanding. Mainly
that 99.999% of the universe is plasma!
Using this fact, and the recent actual observed and tested characteristics of plasma on earth, applying
these findings to what we see in space is pure common sence science, and does not require the invoking of untestable entities like dark matter that
modern astronomy relies so heavily on.
By far the most interesting aspect of Plasma Cosmology is their ideas on the sun. They state that the sun has a capacitance (i'll try to keep this
simple) and thus exhibits a high voltage. This means that the sun has a net positive charge and acts like an electrical plasmasphere. This positive
charge effects particles in the solar wind differnently, so positive ions (such as protons) are strongly repelled away from the sun, wheras negative
ions (electrons) are attracted to it. This gives rise to a constant stream of particles flowing into, and out of, the sun. So, the obvious question
arrises; are the incoming electrons sufficient to power the sun? The best research into this has been done by Ralph Juergens, and Earl R. Milton,
professor of physics at the university of Lethbridge in Canada, they made a quantative derivation that the answer is yes.
. this clip explains it well; www.youtube.com...
Science currently states that we are completely disconnected from the rest of the galaxy and the sun creates its energy at a constant rate at its
core. In contrast plasma cosmologists say that the earth is a part of the suns electrical field, and the sun in turn is part of the galaxies elecrical
environment, which are in constant interaction with each other via the galactic flow of ions through space plasma that connect them. This model
explains away many of the mysteries of modern cosmology, the main one being that the corona (the area outside the sun) is millions
hotter than the surface of the sun. If the energy the sun uses was being attracted to it externally this would be exactly
where this energy
would be expessed, which is precisely what we observe. This also explains why the corona is there in the first place (still unexplained by mainstream
views), and also explains the filamentary structure of the corona that we can all see when there is a solar eclipse. There are many other reasons to
expect this will turn out to be correct, but they get a bit more complex, i will post them later.
DO NOT look up any information on plasma cosmology on wikipedia, as the 'experts' who edit the wesite do their best to stop any information getting
This site has been setup as an alternative, and gives a very strong case for the Electric universe/Plasma Cosmology perspective;
[edit on 2-11-2007 by ZeuZZ]
[edit on 2-11-2007 by ZeuZZ]