AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


'USAF struck Syrian nuclear site'


<<  1    2    3    4  >>

Topic started on 2-11-2007 @ 10:47 AM by traderonwallst


'USAF struck Syrian nuclear site'


www.jpost.com

The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction.


The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction.


A US Air Force F-22 Raptor, an F-117 Nighthawk, an F-4 Phantom and an F-15 Eagle fly over Holloman Air Force Base, N.M.
Photo: US Air Force
The sources were quoted as saying that Israeli F-15 and F-16 jets provided cover for the US planes.
(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:47 AM by traderonwallst


Are we really surprised that such a precision attack was carried out by the best Air Force on the planet?

www.jpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:52 AM by COOL HAND


If they nuked the site, where is the fallout from it?

Why would the USAF need to bomb it in the first place with the IAF has the capability to do it itself?

Why are you using al-jazeera as a credible news source?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:58 AM by traderonwallst


reply to post by COOL HAND



Oh yeah, I forgot. Al-Jazeera is only credible when they talk about the innocent civilians we are apparently bombing daily.

It works both ways.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:59 AM by traderonwallst


reply to post by COOL HAND



I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:00 AM by DeadFlagBlues


reply to post by traderonwallst



Good find, man! This is pretty amazing stuff. And you know the snowball effect of news! We'll be hearing more and more about this in the coming weeks if it has any truth to it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:02 AM by deltaboy


Originally posted by traderonwallst
I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles.


two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction.


Guess somehow they used nuclear missiles that didn't go nuclear.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:06 AM by Silcone Synapse


One of their new MRR(minimal residual radiation) nukes maybe?
Or just more hogwash from the J Post...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:07 AM by DeadFlagBlues


reply to post by deltaboy



Oh, hey. Weird. First result on "tactical nuclear weapon" on google.

The new marketing campaign.

"Nukes, not just mushroom clouds!"

[edit on 2-11-2007 by DeadFlagBlues]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:07 AM by Dr Love


Originally posted by traderonwallst
Are we really surprised that such a precision attack was carried out by the best Air Force on the planet?


They bombed a big square building with laser guided bombs. Yeah, there's some serious talent at work there. It's probably easier than taking a dump and hitting the bowl.

BTW, does it really even matter who carried out the bombing?

Peace



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:08 AM by ChiKeyMonKey


Originally posted by traderonwallst


Are we really surprised that such a precision attack was carried out by the best Air Force on the planet?

www.jpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


It said that the USAF did it. Not the RAF!

If the USAF did it. Why would they need support from Israeli planes?

MonKey



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:13 AM by COOL HAND


Originally posted by traderonwallst
I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles.


Did you read the article?

They specifically mentioned that each of the two aircraft carried one tactical nuclear device, and only one was used.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:13 AM by dbates


Originally posted by ChiKeyMonKey
If the USAF did it. Why would they need support from Israeli planes?

Agreed. Why would a F-117 need support aircraft? Sort of defeats the purpose of stealth doesn't it? This story has all sorts of holes in it. Something was bombed in Syria however. Perhaps the Israeli jets flew around as a distraction. You know, like when Gandalf marched an army to the black gate to distract Sauron so Frodo could torch the ring.

Al-Jazeera throws in enough truth to keep things interesting, but to say that it was all true is probably incorrect.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:17 AM by traderonwallst


Read the article!!!!!!!!


It says each was armed with 1 strategic nuclear missle. Planes are not armed with just 1 anything. They were probably loaded to the hill with wwapons, they chose to point the nuclear missle thing out. It also said 1 bomb was dropped between the planes. Where does it say it was nuclear? The site was a nuclear installation, so 1 bomb should do the job.

Jeez!

Stupid does as stupid is told to do!

DAM
23



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:20 AM by traderonwallst


Originally posted by COOL HAND
Originally posted by traderonwallst
I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles.


Did you read the article?

They specifically mentioned that each of the two aircraft carried one tactical nuclear device, and only one was used.


Did you read the article? Where does it say a nuclear missle was used?

You ever hear of any war plane going for an attack manned with just 1 weapon? The planes were probably full af ammunitions, but they pointed out the 1 missle each. Come on people....common sense clears this right up!!!!! LOGIC, LOGIC, LOGIC!!!!


Stupid does what stupid is told to do!!!!!


DAM
23



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:21 AM by mythatsabigprobe


Originally posted by dbates
like when Gandalf marched an army to the black gate to distract Sauron so Frodo could torch the ring.



That didn't work out so well for Frodo...



Like the Lord of the Rings, this news article is a fantasy.

[edit on 11/2/2007 by mythatsabigprobe]

[edit on 11/2/2007 by mythatsabigprobe]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:25 AM by traderonwallst


reply to post by dbates



It was done undercover of the RAF. The rules of engagement were probably clear. If Syria was to send up fighters to defend the sight, only the Israeli fighters were probably given permission to engage them, as a dogfight over Syria with American fighters would have led to an immediate retaliation from Iran and the rest of the countries over there. This is expected from Israel and not from the US, thats why the US was involved. If 1 bomb was dropped, who is to say that is was an American missle? Maybe we were there for the ride along, to make sure things went as planned and that the installation was really what Israel claimed it to be.

-The following is Not directed at you dbates-

Why do people just react, and not think about things before they post?


DAM
23



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:25 AM by COOL HAND


Originally posted by traderonwallst
Read the article!!!!!!!!
It says each was armed with 1 strategic nuclear missle. Planes are not armed with just 1 anything. They were probably loaded to the hill with wwapons, they chose to point the nuclear missle thing out. It also said 1 bomb was dropped between the planes. Where does it say it was nuclear? The site was a nuclear installation, so 1 bomb should do the job.
Jeez!
Stupid does as stupid is told to do!
DAM
23


Do you have any idea how much a nuke weighs or how many stations it takes up?

What other kind of bomb could have destroyed the facility with one bomb that could be carried by a tactical aircraft?

You can't destroy a nuclear facilty with one bomb, unless it is a nuclear bomb. You can't get a reactor to just chain react unless it is under precise conditions.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:36 AM by makeitso


With a little digging you just might find that Jpost quoted al-Jazeera, who quoted Islam Memo, who quoted...

Wait for it...

An anonymous businessman.

LOL




[edit on 11/2/07 by makeitso]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:36 AM by traderonwallst


DUDE:

It was a missle, not a bomb. Strategic nuclear missle. say it with me.....Strategic nuclear missle. It was not a BOMB, as they would have been carried by Stealth BOMBERS not stealth FIGHTERS.

Like I said.....


Read the stories, analyze, calm down, then post.

Stop jumping to conclusions. If you rationalized, you would have seen these were fighters, not bombers, hence you would have made the very simple connection.

Stupid does as stupid is told to do!

DAM
23


[edit on 2-11-2007 by traderonwallst]



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4  >>





























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.140 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.