The Fourth Kind: Alien Abductions - The Big Picture from George Knapp

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum. (rss)

'USAF struck Syrian nuclear site' << 1 2 3 4 >>

Topic started on 2-11-2007 @ 10:47 AM by traderonwallst
'USAF struck Syrian nuclear site' www.jpost.com The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction. The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction. A US Air Force F-22 Raptor, an F-117 Nighthawk, an F-4 Phantom and an F-15 Eagle fly over Holloman Air Force Base, N.M. Photo: US Air Force The sources were quoted as saying that Israeli F-15 and F-16 jets provided cover for the US planes. (visit the link for the full news article)
copyright & usage
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics Hot Topics \| Top Topics \| This Week \| Subscribe \| Home
reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:47 AM by traderonwallst
Are we really surprised that such a precision attack was carried out by the best Air Force on the planet? www.jpost.com (visit the link for the full news article)
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:52 AM by COOL HAND
If they nuked the site, where is the fallout from it? Why would the USAF need to bomb it in the first place with the IAF has the capability to do it itself? Why are you using al-jazeera as a credible news source?
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:58 AM by traderonwallst
reply to post by COOL HAND Oh yeah, I forgot. Al-Jazeera is only credible when they talk about the innocent civilians we are apparently bombing daily. It works both ways.
copyright & usage
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:59 AM by traderonwallst
reply to post by COOL HAND I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:00 AM by DeadFlagBlues
reply to post by traderonwallst Good find, man! This is pretty amazing stuff. And you know the snowball effect of news! We'll be hearing more and more about this in the coming weeks if it has any truth to it.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:02 AM by deltaboy
Originally posted by traderonwallst I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles. two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction. Guess somehow they used nuclear missiles that didn't go nuclear.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:06 AM by Silcone Synapse
One of their new MRR(minimal residual radiation) nukes maybe? Or just more hogwash from the J Post...
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:07 AM by DeadFlagBlues
reply to post by deltaboy Oh, hey. Weird. First result on "tactical nuclear weapon" on google. The new marketing campaign. "Nukes, not just mushroom clouds!" [edit on 2-11-2007 by DeadFlagBlues]
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:07 AM by Dr Love
Originally posted by traderonwallst Are we really surprised that such a precision attack was carried out by the best Air Force on the planet? They bombed a big square building with laser guided bombs. Yeah, there's some serious talent at work there. It's probably easier than taking a dump and hitting the bowl. BTW, does it really even matter who carried out the bombing? Peace
copyright & usage
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:08 AM by ChiKeyMonKey
Originally posted by traderonwallst Are we really surprised that such a precision attack was carried out by the best Air Force on the planet? www.jpost.com (visit the link for the full news article) It said that the USAF did it. Not the RAF! If the USAF did it. Why would they need support from Israeli planes? MonKey
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:13 AM by COOL HAND
Originally posted by traderonwallst I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles. Did you read the article? They specifically mentioned that each of the two aircraft carried one tactical nuclear device, and only one was used.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:13 AM by dbates
Originally posted by ChiKeyMonKey If the USAF did it. Why would they need support from Israeli planes? Agreed. Why would a F-117 need support aircraft? Sort of defeats the purpose of stealth doesn't it? This story has all sorts of holes in it. Something was bombed in Syria however. Perhaps the Israeli jets flew around as a distraction. You know, like when Gandalf marched an army to the black gate to distract Sauron so Frodo could torch the ring. Al-Jazeera throws in enough truth to keep things interesting, but to say that it was all true is probably incorrect.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:17 AM by traderonwallst
Read the article!!!!!!!! It says each was armed with 1 strategic nuclear missle. Planes are not armed with just 1 anything. They were probably loaded to the hill with wwapons, they chose to point the nuclear missle thing out. It also said 1 bomb was dropped between the planes. Where does it say it was nuclear? The site was a nuclear installation, so 1 bomb should do the job. Jeez! Stupid does as stupid is told to do! DAM 23
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:20 AM by traderonwallst
Originally posted by COOL HAND Originally posted by traderonwallst I don't believe the article said they nuked the site. I believe it said they were carrying nuclear missles. Did you read the article? They specifically mentioned that each of the two aircraft carried one tactical nuclear device, and only one was used. Did you read the article? Where does it say a nuclear missle was used? You ever hear of any war plane going for an attack manned with just 1 weapon? The planes were probably full af ammunitions, but they pointed out the 1 missle each. Come on people....common sense clears this right up!!!!! LOGIC, LOGIC, LOGIC!!!! Stupid does what stupid is told to do!!!!! DAM 23
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:21 AM by mythatsabigprobe
Originally posted by dbates like when Gandalf marched an army to the black gate to distract Sauron so Frodo could torch the ring. That didn't work out so well for Frodo... Like the Lord of the Rings, this news article is a fantasy. [edit on 11/2/2007 by mythatsabigprobe] [edit on 11/2/2007 by mythatsabigprobe]
copyright & usage
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:25 AM by traderonwallst
reply to post by dbates It was done undercover of the RAF. The rules of engagement were probably clear. If Syria was to send up fighters to defend the sight, only the Israeli fighters were probably given permission to engage them, as a dogfight over Syria with American fighters would have led to an immediate retaliation from Iran and the rest of the countries over there. This is expected from Israel and not from the US, thats why the US was involved. If 1 bomb was dropped, who is to say that is was an American missle? Maybe we were there for the ride along, to make sure things went as planned and that the installation was really what Israel claimed it to be. -The following is Not directed at you dbates- Why do people just react, and not think about things before they post? DAM 23
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:25 AM by COOL HAND
Originally posted by traderonwallst Read the article!!!!!!!! It says each was armed with 1 strategic nuclear missle. Planes are not armed with just 1 anything. They were probably loaded to the hill with wwapons, they chose to point the nuclear missle thing out. It also said 1 bomb was dropped between the planes. Where does it say it was nuclear? The site was a nuclear installation, so 1 bomb should do the job. Jeez! Stupid does as stupid is told to do! DAM 23 Do you have any idea how much a nuke weighs or how many stations it takes up? What other kind of bomb could have destroyed the facility with one bomb that could be carried by a tactical aircraft? You can't destroy a nuclear facilty with one bomb, unless it is a nuclear bomb. You can't get a reactor to just chain react unless it is under precise conditions.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:36 AM by makeitso
With a little digging you just might find that Jpost quoted al-Jazeera, who quoted Islam Memo, who quoted... Wait for it... An anonymous businessman. LOL [edit on 11/2/07 by makeitso]
copyright & usage

reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:36 AM by traderonwallst
DUDE: It was a missle, not a bomb. Strategic nuclear missle. say it with me.....Strategic nuclear missle. It was not a BOMB, as they would have been carried by Stealth BOMBERS not stealth FIGHTERS. Like I said..... Read the stories, analyze, calm down, then post. Stop jumping to conclusions. If you rationalized, you would have seen these were fighters, not bombers, hence you would have made the very simple connection. Stupid does as stupid is told to do! DAM 23 [edit on 2-11-2007 by traderonwallst]
copyright & usage