NASA Scientist Fired - Promises Disclosure, page 57
Pages: <<  54    55    56    57    58  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 162 times


reply posted on 16-6-2008 @ 12:14 AM by bknapple32
reply to post by zorgon


i saw this hopeing for an update. any other sites i can visit zorgon? to me its news straight from the men them self that is really news worthy


reply posted on 28-7-2008 @ 09:29 AM by ToolFanMael
Originally posted by Vector J
reply to post by johnlear


Whoa there john. You can't have a substantially thicker atmosphere on one side of a stellar body than on the other. Atmospheres, generally speaking are fairly uniform across a surface, air doesn;t tend to congregate in one place. Or are you trying to say it's being forcibly held there? In which case, I'd love to hear your opinion on how on earth that would be possible...

Vector J


in a dome perhaps? he doesnt have to explain how on earth it woul be possible being that its not on earth


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 10:39 PM by eaganthorn
Originally posted by ToolFanMael
Originally posted by Vector J
reply to post by johnlear


Whoa there john. You can't have a substantially thicker atmosphere on one side of a stellar body than on the other. Atmospheres, generally speaking are fairly uniform across a surface, air doesn;t tend to congregate in one place. Or are you trying to say it's being forcibly held there? In which case, I'd love to hear your opinion on how on earth that would be possible...

Vector J


in a dome perhaps? he doesnt have to explain how on earth it woul be possible being that its not on earth


Untrue, our atmosphere is thicker in some areas than others, depending on time of day, the season, humidity, baro-pressure, wind direction etc. it need not be a uniformed density here why would we expect an atmosphere maintain uniform density some where else? Many celestial bodies have a fixed dark side and any atmosphere, how ever thin it is, would be very different on the dark side from the light side.



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 05:19 AM by spikey
reply to post by logicize


The simple answer is YES! We ARE ready to open this particular can of worms!

In fact, we have ALWAYS been ready for this information.
The powers withholding this, have convinced us that we would panic, or or otherwise 'not ready'. But, of course, THEY are ready aren't they!

They have the required mental fortitude to rationally cope with the knowledge, whereas WE are deemed to be too infantile, too irrational, too immature, too stupid.

And what do they base this 'patronising wisdom' on? A 1930's staged radio broadcast. Yes, that one. (Orson Wells, War of the worlds)

This is totally bunk.

Yes, SOME people freaked out, although not to the extent of blind panic in the streets, as they would have you believe.
The reason some people were, well, let's say 'a little concerned', is that the radio program 'test' was WELL LOADED.

That is, instead of saying that extra terrestrial life exists or had existed in the past, and more or less leave it there, the radio program went on at great lengths to say, that the aliens were busy slaughtering people with their 'death rays', and that there was absolutely nothing the military could do that was even remotely effective against them!

If that isn't 'stacking the decks' i don't know what is!

The 'test' was set up to fail.

It's one thing for the population to digest and comprehend that alien life exists or had existed, but quite another to say, that the same alien life, is invading and killing us humans en-masse, and there is nothing we can do about it to stop them.

If they released the info tomorrow, most of the world would say, yeah, i always knew that, or something similar. And be quite interested in finding out more.

If they said, alien life exists, and is wiping out humanity and eating us, and we cannot stop them, so say goodbye to your loved ones in the few days we have left to live as a species before we are killed and eaten, most of the world would freak out (naturally).

See the difference?

We have always been ready for information that effects our existence, it is the nature of being human to aquire knowledge and then to apply rationale and logic, to move forwards with the knowledge.

The idea that we are not, is simply social conditioning over time.

spikey.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 03:44 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by RFBurns


The only problem I have with this case is that nothing new was presented after all that talk.

And the things already known do not really show anything special (as far as I have seen on the Internet, I do not have any book from Hoagland), just bad copies of known photos.


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 11:39 AM by spikey
reply to post by sputniksteve


Errm...which one's are the 'normal people' here then?

Don't think i've come across those strange creatures on here yet!

;-)


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:02 PM by spikey
reply to post by RFBurns


A man with the intelligence and career history that RCH has, can earn a very good living in myriad ways.

Espousing a subject centered on aliens and ancient alien ruins, hyper-dimentional physics, and so on, that although to my mind is perfectly rational and reasonable, generally makes about 60 - 80% of the world say 'What a nutjob!'.

In other words, IF this bloke was on the gravy train, there are a lot easier and less professionally risky ways to do it, especially with his credentials.

It seems obvious to me at least, that RCH is a sincere as they come.

Yes, he is earning out of books and films, but what should we have him do?

We want him to bring us information, but how can this be accomplished without funds? Should he sign on for state benefits?

Personally, i think this bloke deserves to make a few bucks out of his hard and consciencious work.


spikey.

[edit on 7-1-2009 by spikey]
Pages: <<  54    55    56    57    58  >>    ^^TOP^^