AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aliens and UFOs discussion forum.  (rss)


NASA UFO STS-120 External Fuel Tank


<<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>



reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:52 AM by Copernicus


reply to post by Solarskye



So those were around in ancient human history too? Cool!

And what about in the 1940's with the Battle of LA? Or back before that even when the nazi scientists experimented with trying to reverse engineer the UFO's?

Yes, some of the UFO's are made by humans and some of the technology are from reverse engineered alien technology. But some alien ships are real out there... the US is trying to make their own, fine, but they have no chance of competing with genuine ships.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 12:00 PM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by Solarskye
Originally posted by Copernicus
Wake up people. You know you're going to have to face reality at some point. UFO's have been here forever, and have been covered up since the 1940's.


Yes ufo's have been here for along time. Here's one that's just coming out of TopSecret society.

Top Secret Stealth Jet Revealed ( Bird Of Prey )

There's the U-2 spy plane, SR-71 Blackbird, F-117 Nighthawk

Northrop Tacit Blue, UAV"s, Aurora, Blackstar, and alot more of them that we won't know about for a long time. Come on, give us humans more credit than that. ET's I haven't seen, but all those secret ufo's of our topsecret military just keep popping up.


they are hardly top secret,so many people have seen them for so long,throughout history.

many ufo show qualities that are impossible by any of the craft you posted above.i doubt there was technology available in the past to explain away historical ufo accounts

give E.T some credit,we will be exploring distant worlds that show signs of life one day



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 12:06 PM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by topsailgrl
This is my very first post. Have been reading for a VERY long time.

I watched this footage over and over and I for some reason am seeing something a little different that no one has mentioned so far.

If you watch the video from this link:

spaceflight.nasa.gov...

And stop it at exactly 28 seconds you can see that the object is NOT crystal, ice, trident, or lightening shaped. This object is actually triangular shaped and possibly reflecting light making it appear oddly shaped.

Most of the object seems to be almost transparent until at the 28 second mark on the footage where the sunlight and clouds reflect the true shape.


once again notice the object pass under a cloud,yet the fuel tank shows no interaction with any clouds in any of the videos.

for if it were below the fuel tank and passing under that cloud,the object would have to massive,bigger than the fuel tank.

electrostatic levitation causes clouds.

[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 12:09 PM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by nightmare_david
Here's video of STS-115 taking off. It was shot from a camera on the external tank.


YouTube Link


At 1:47 the small boosters detach. You don't see any huge debris anywhere.

At 2:08 it jumps further ahead into the launch, but you can see how much further ahead they are because you see more of Earth in the background.

At 2:17 the shuttle detaches from the external tank. No large ice chunks or anything seen anywhere and you can clearly make out what's holding th shuttle to the tank. It actually looks like nothing much attaches the shuttle to the tank and nothing comes off the tank when the shuttle detaches

I don't know how much higher they are from the time the small boosters detach to the time the external tank detaches, but I don't think you'd see the small boosters anywhere from the shuttle.

Also I want to bring up again that the crystal object has to be huge, possibly bigger than the tank itself. It casts a shadow on clouds and the tank doesn't. Which puts the object under the tank and look how big it is then. Side by side that would make it bigger than the tank. How would a piece of ice that big form on that tank (or the shuttle) and come off without at least punturing the tank (or the shuttle) somewhere?

They said a small chunk of foam busted a hole in the shuttles wing. Imagine what a piece of ice the same size as that piece of foam would do.




the object is above the fuel tank and interacting with clouds that shouldnt be there.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 02:45 PM by Solarskye


reply to post by Copernicus



You can believe what you want to about aliens and all the other theories about alien life. For me I don't want to start believing because if I do then I will be susceptable to believe anything. I say what I think, but it's not believing. People have said that time travel is possible and I think it might be, but I won't believe it until I see it! 1940 could of been time traveling humans that were accidently spotted on radar and said Oh! crap we've been seen and threw up the shields and left. But I won't believe that, but it's possible.
I stated all my ufo's as factual craft that has since been spotted or taken off the top secret list. To say aliens are operating ufo's is just theory and until you can introduce me to an alien then I can't believe they exist. To see a flying saucer doesn't mean an alien is in it. I refuse to believe what people write down in their books or just looking at something face value.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 04:04 PM by austinthetitan


i couldnt see anything help plz



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 05:53 PM by bigvig316


I don't see anything that we can conclusivly call a UFO, there seems to be what looks like a crystalin structure out there but it was brief and could be explained away as junk floating around out there. In the 50 years of space flight, I am sure we have left some stuff behind. Plus there what look to be dots flying around which could logicily be aircraft many mile below the faster moving external fuel tank.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 06:32 PM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by bigvig316
I don't see anything that we can conclusivly call a UFO, there seems to be what looks like a crystalin structure out there but it was brief and could be explained away as junk floating around out there. In the 50 years of space flight, I am sure we have left some stuff behind. Plus there what look to be dots flying around which could logicily be aircraft many mile below the faster moving external fuel tank.


so your telling me the same object travelling slower than the fuel tank, sighted in these two different encounters ;
www.youtube.com...
www.liveleak.com...

WAS SPACE JUNK

how could the "space junk" be over taken by the fuel tank,re accelerate and then be over taken again?.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 07:16 PM by bigvig316


reply to post by wierdalienshiznit



I have re watched the video several times. As I stated before there is nothing on there that could be alien craft or extra terrestrial. There were however, several small white dots that seem to cut acoss the fuel tank. but by the way they moved, it looks like something broke or feel off the front of the tank and move quickly out of frame as it where ice condensation and broke off as it was re entering the troposhper. the last white dot at approx. 4 minute mark could easily be a plane or jet much lower in the atmosphere, as I previously stated. the only thing that could be confused as a ufo is a strech. the crystalin like object. but when it turns and list laisily out of fram looks like a long hose or rope that is floating as space junk.

I am sorry my friend, you imagenation may be getting the better of you. I want to believe like the rest of the world, but I am afraid this video will not due.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 08:03 PM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by bigvig316
reply to post by wierdalienshiznit



I have re watched the video several times. As I stated before there is nothing on there that could be alien craft or extra terrestrial. There were however, several small white dots that seem to cut acoss the fuel tank. but by the way they moved, it looks like something broke or feel off the front of the tank and move quickly out of frame as it where ice condensation and broke off as it was re entering the troposhper. the last white dot at approx. 4 minute mark could easily be a plane or jet much lower in the atmosphere, as I previously stated. the only thing that could be confused as a ufo is a strech. the crystalin like object. but when it turns and list laisily out of fram looks like a long hose or rope that is floating as space junk.

I am sorry my friend, you imagenation may be getting the better of you. I want to believe like the rest of the world, but I am afraid this video will not due.


if you read anything i said you would know no have no interest in the spheres.
read the whole thread,please

the object and fuel tank arnt floating they are falling to earth at high speed which burns up solid meteors,ice would melt.

we have already establish the object and fuel tank cannot originate from the same source as the fuel tank falls faster than the object,yet the fuel tank is over taking the object when it should already have overtaken it early in its descent..


please tell me how the same piece of space junk can be over taken on two seperate occasions by the fuel tank when they are falling to earth?.and when the fuel tank is falling faster at all times due to less air resistance?

explain it.

i


[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 09:48 PM by wierdalienshiznit


ok i want people to consider the following information.

firstly observe this video of space STS-120 launch

www.youtube.com...

You will discover that the fuel tank is ejected upon orbit(roughly 100km).
These pictures of the "crystaline" object" are being filmed from that incredible height,yet we witness the object cleary casts a shadow upon a cloud,and passes under one in the other vid.

First vid- shadow is upon cloud at 2.38 secs,lower right hand corner

www.youtube.com...

second vid-the object passes under cloud at 30 secs

www.youtube.com...

consider clouds dont form outside of the troposphere(max height 20KM)
en.wikipedia.org...'s_atmosphere#Temperature_and_layers

this would have to be 80 km below the space shuttle given known science,

So EITHER object is massive enough to cast a shadow that is observable from 80 km above via a hand held cam,OR those clouds as i previously stated are at a higher altitude than known science,they SHOULD NOT BE THERE .

We can for once disprove the ice theory,from orbit ice has 0% chance of surviving re entry.

in addition with my above post...
taking this serious yet?.


[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 2-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 10:25 PM by Bean328


before blasting off they dont use liquid nitrogen to cool the tanks because the only part that would have to cool is the cone at the bottom were the blast is coming from and they dont have to worry about that because of the fuel mixture they use. when the two ingredients mix they basically become extremely cold and they are transported through tubes inside the cone to the engine were they are ignited which would take care of any ice that could possibly but unlikely form.
As for any ice forming at any other part of the tank i think the big vibrations from the engine would take care of anything trying to form and even if they did they would be pretty small chunks. not like the one in the original video. thats my thoughts on that. any other suggestions?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:28 PM by wierdalienshiznit


reply to post by Bean328



my suggestion would be for people to take the time to look at the points im making.
im puzzled why nowone can seem to understand the importance of the things im saying.

hello?,anyone?, where are all the critics?.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2007 @ 11:52 PM by verylowfrequency


A video well worth posting, but further research would be required before I would classify the object as anything other than part of the jettisoned tank or ice built up during fueling.

I watched it the first time on the NASA channel and I didn't notice the crystalline looking object, though I have no doubt the object is there & not added in later.

The crystal object appears to be falling with the tank and may be taking a bit different course because it's aerodynamically dissimilar to the tank. Likely its a huge piece of ice that formed somewhere between the shuttle & tank and was kept from falling off until the tank separation.

As the tank & object are still shedding off speed after just minutes before being released by the shuttle, thus have not yet built up enough friction to burn or melt.

Likely NASA would be happy to give you an explanation, unless it is indeed something far out or unknown.

Still a good post & I personally find it spectacular, but then again I've traveled thousands of miles just to watch a launch or two.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2007 @ 12:04 AM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by verylowfrequency
A video well worth posting, but further research would be required before I would classify the object as anything other than part of the jettisoned tank or ice built up during fueling.

I watched it the first time on the NASA channel and I didn't notice the crystalline looking object, though I have no doubt the object is there & not added in later.

h
The crystal object appears to be falling with the tank and may be taking a bit different course because it's aerodynamically dissimilar to the tank. Likely its a huge piece of ice that formed somewhere between the shuttle debris & the fuel tank and was kept from falling off until the tank separation.

As the tank & object are still shedding off speed after just minutes before being released by the shuttle, thus have not yet built up enough friction to burn or melt.

Likely NASA would be happy to give you an explanation, unless it is indeed something far out or unknown.

Still a good post & I personally find it spectacular, but then again I've traveled thousands of miles just to watch a launch or two.


Thanks for reply,
However, the object passes UNDER a cloud,which must be below 20 km.at this distance the object if it were ice would have melted.

at this distance the differing qualities of air resistance resulting in the fuel tank falling faster than the object would have rendered a re-encounter between space shuttle debry and fuel tank impossible.especially considering there were TWO SEPARATE encounters between the objects that resulted in the fuel tank over taking the object.

understand!?


[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2007 @ 12:22 AM by Solarskye


reply to post by wierdalienshiznit



Your guess is as good as mine on this one. What could it be? I seen it go through the clouds and the shadow you talk about almost looks like a different but same kind of thing. I just wish there was more time on the video to see if it was another one. At first I thought it might be some white cables because they rerouted some cables on the ISS, but now I don't know.
It was definetly lower to the clouds than the fuel tank was. Who know's maybe nasa is letting us get a glimpse of whatever these may be on purpose.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 3-11-2007 @ 12:31 AM by verylowfrequency


I don't see any evidence that the crystal object goes behind the clouds. What I see is an object that is very similar in color to the clouds and a white object on a white background appears to go behind the clouds because you no longer have a reference of blue ocean and thus the object looks as though it going under or through the clouds, but that is just an optical illusion - in my opinion.

At this point I don't see enough evidence to believe otherwise.

As far as seeing the object twice. Another illusion is created because the camera is constantly zooming & panning therefore the camera brings the object back into view, not the object flying back into view. Still there's the possibility that the object may change speeds while tumbling faster in the one position and more drag in another just like air brakes on an aircraft wing can slow and aircraft when in the deployed position and speed the aircraft when not.

[edit on 3-11-2007 by verylowfrequency]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2007 @ 12:34 AM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by Solarskye
reply to post by wierdalienshiznit



Your guess is as good as mine on this one. What could it be? I seen it go through the clouds and the shadow you talk about almost looks like a different but same kind of thing. I just wish there was more time on the video to see if it was another one. At first I thought it might be some white cables because they rerouted some cables on the ISS, but now I don't know.
It was definetly lower to the clouds than the fuel tank was. Who know's maybe nasa is letting us get a glimpse of whatever these may be on purpose.




if it is below the fuel tank,then the object must be MASSIVE as this film was recorded at an altitude of over 100km,80km above.

but see i think the fuel tank and object are much higher,and those clouds arnt natural.

either its a massive object with adjustable speed,

or theres some really funky clouds floating about



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2007 @ 12:35 AM by wierdalienshiznit


Originally posted by verylowfrequency
I don't see any evidence that the crystal object goes behind the clouds. What I see is an object that is very similar in color to the clouds and a white object on a white background appears to go behind the clouds because you no longer have a reference of blue ocean and thus the object looks as though it going under or through the clouds, but that is just an optical illusion - in my opinion.

At this point I don't see enough evidence to believe otherwise.

As far as seeing the object twice. Another illusion is created because the camera is constantly zooming & panning therefore the camera brings the object back into view, not the object flying back into view. Still there's the possibility that the object may change speeds while tumbling faster in the one position and more drag in another just like air brakes on an aircraft wing can slow and aircraft when in the deployed position and speed the aircraft when not.

[edit on 3-11-2007 by verylowfrequency]


explain the shadow,filmed from 80km above.

also,that is cloud,anyone can see that.
people arnt blind.

29 secs-its a cloud
www.youtube.com...

by encounters i mean the two separate videos,which are two different incidents
heres the other one, www.liveleak.com...


you have a motive.

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]

[edit on 3-11-2007 by wierdalienshiznit]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2007 @ 01:05 AM by wierdalienshiznit


if you think it doesnt pass below a cloud....

the object cast a shadow upon a cloud;

either that object is CLOSE enough to that cloud to casts a shadow,thus my assertions are true.

OR

that object is much HIGHER up and is MASSIVE enough to cast SHADOWS on the clouds with a MAX height of 20km,my assertions also true.

OR

the clouds are higher up than they can possibly be.



   copyright & usage 


<<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>





























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.037 seconds
Page processed in 0.320 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.