Bomb Iran, majority of Americans say, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 02:31 PM by kosmicjack
reply to post by Becker44



On edge? No, just disgusted. I reject this poll, not because of my personal views, but because I know, first hand, how easily poll questions and results can be manipulated. I reject this poll because in, my own life (including people with a wide-range of ideologies, socio-economic back-grounds and education levels) I don't know anyone who agrees with the results of the polling. Lest you question my social circle as being vastly left-wing or "raging anti-war" as you put it, I voted for Bush twice, regrettably, as did most of my family and friends.

I assure you, you will encounter ATS members far more on the "edge" than me. And, of course, as this is America and ATS, you are welcome to your own opinion, as am I.


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 02:39 PM by Becker44
reply to post by kosmicjack



Well written Jack.

Look I was in the Bush camp as well. I think he is doing a terrible job! I never liked the alternative in the last vote. John Kerry, you gotta be kidding me!

Our circles differ perhaps. I know many people who would have voted in the affirmative on that particular poll.

I see it like this, We can not let the Iranian regime (as it is constructed today) obtain a nuclear device. I know the left wants dialogue with this cat but my gut tells me he's not listening too well.

If the poll question inserted a line perhaps stating: "As a last resort" would you be in favor of bombing Iran perhaps that would have sat better with you and others. If the question was posed in the above manner and I were convinced they were achieving their nuclear goals I would vote to Bomb em'!

Becker



reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 03:48 PM by SpeakerofTruth
reply to post by theutahbigfoothunter



I agree... I think that Universities such as Columbia should have their charter yanked for even considering giving someone like Ahmadinijinut a platform to speak on. Then they had the audacity, after labeling people who oppose Ahmadinejinut as "nazis", to say that they would have allowed Adolf Hitler to speak at their University. They ought to be ashamed of themselves.



[edit on 30-10-2007 by SpeakerofTruth]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 03:56 PM by Becker44
reply to post by 2believeor0



The questions you pose are quite leading. They offer simple answers however, we could argue on the wording a little.

Like you said no flames. It's not my game anyways.

So here are your answers:

1. U.S.A
2. U.S.A (but I don't care for the wording)
3. U.S.A.
4. Iran

How'd I do?

Becker



[edit on 30-10-2007 by Becker44]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 04:06 PM by Wirral Bagpuss
I get annoyed too when i see newspaper reports of an American football player asking doe they speak English in London? Errrr yes!!! It is after all the Capital City of my Country, England!! Not only that but America inherited the use of the English language when the first people arrived on the Mayflower !!! I do think it is high time people started learning about different countries and cultures and where they are located on the map/globe before bombing them into the stone age!. It might even help world peace (or what's left of it!) if people had a better understanding of the world and more tolerance.
Having said that i DO think the Iranian President is off his rocker big time. No question of that. BUT not ALL Iranians are fanatics. Indeed many ordinary iranians are prisoners in their own country trapped by a corrupt and dangerous regime. There are attempts by some to introduce reforms and introduce a less fundalmentalist Islamic society in Iran. 20 years ago for women not to cover their faces in public would have meant probably their deaths. Now things are much more relaxed. Society in Iran is changing, albiet slowly. So you see things are not black and white as is made to be in the media or by politicians. I have no quarrel with Iran per say, i certaintly do not want to see USA bomb Iran back into the stone age ! Instead of doing that it should be approaching the reformist party in Iran, cultivating relationships with them and give backing to a coup of the present regime. CIA have done this in the past and are more than capable of doing so again given the political backing. Far less bloody than what is being proposed now which which hack off Russia and trigger WW3. There is more than one way to skin a cat as they say !! One final thought..if they can cut a deal with North Korea why can't the same be done with Iran??


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 04:06 PM by 2believeor0
reply to post by Becker44



Everyone is free to form their own opinion of course. However, I imagine that that is not the conclusion other people around the world would reach. An american citizen would certainly think so, just as followers of Ahmedinejad think - we are always right, no matter what the facts say!


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 04:07 PM by wyldwylly
Originally posted by Terrapop

Like stupid sheeps on the field. Wake up America :-(

rawstory.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


Your OP says, the Majority of Americans says....

The Zogby Poll? First off, the "Majority of Americans" probably have never Heard of this said Poll. So how in the heck can the "Majority of Americans" Put in their 2 cents worth? This poll is inaccurate, as you can't tell if someone is of age via telephone, and who did they call?

1028 People Questioned.
That is no were NEAR the MAJORITY of Americans!

Survey Methodology [Zogby America Likely Voters] 10/24/07 thru 10/27/07



reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 04:16 PM by wyldwylly
Just for clarity
The OP link leads to :
The Raw Story
Which then in-turn leads to the comment in that story: Zogby International survey
And on the bottom of that page it tells of the methodology on this survey: Methodological statement on this survey

Sorry, but one thousand plus people do not count for the "Majority of Americans" and this should be thrown out of the court room!


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 04:35 PM by Becker44
reply to post by ProfTom



Thanks Professor.

Hey if I could throw you a few ATS points I would. Sure looks like you could use some.

I think we're really having a philisophical discussion rather than the ole' "Show me the link man" kind of argument. Sure it's been a little heated from both sides but I must say the level of thought, civility, and ideas have been terrific.

Not one MOD has had to step in and take our ball away. So I think you may want to join in or perhaps head over to the Aliens forum where proof is a daily subject.

Thanks for coming,

Becker


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 04:39 PM by Becker44
reply to post by wyldwylly



Good points Wylly,

Little tough for many of these pollsters to get a much bigger sampling. In your opinion how many people should be surveyed in order to have a clearer picture of the American sentiment?

I truly agree the sampling is small. We can look to many polls which have been incorrect. Remember the exit polls from the last presidential election? Talk about being way off!

I just don't know how to get a better sampling.

Becker
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^