It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bush Claims To Never Said Iraq was Imminent Threat

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 03:24 PM
link   


TextThe Daily Mislead


[Edited on 30-1-2004 by Tesla]




posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Wonder how Bush is gonna get out of this one...he contradicts himself so much. I dont know why congress bought this nice story in the first place, we hadnt found any WMD, and we probably never will.



posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 03:48 PM
link   
I don't think we'll find any either. Now I don't know if Bush is part of the NWO conspiracy or not but I can already tell he's doing whatever he can, regardless if it's lying, to remain in office another term. He's making sure the people are on his side so they'll vote for him again.

[Edited on 28-1-2004 by mrmulder]



posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 03:57 PM
link   
Anybody that votes for this guy is an idiot.



posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 03:58 PM
link   
I am fine with the short war Bush iniciated(for whatever reason), the outcome has been good to my suprise.
Of course some problems, but that's acceptable concerning the different culture and history.

But what really pisses me off is something like that. Fighting the war okay, but then telling the people that it wasn't an imminent threat after the whole PR relied on that...bah.

*imagine*
I as a soldier doing my duty in Iraq, probably having a friend lost and one wounded would feel so utterly depressed after reading this. This is the biggest ass-kick president Bush could ever ever do to the US Army.

Now I really feel with the US Army in Iraq! It is such a shame.



posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 05:10 PM
link   
Well thank god he didnt lie about something important, you know, like a BJ



posted on Jan, 28 2004 @ 06:20 PM
link   
Now, this is a BLATANT LIE from the Bush Adminsistration. There are no 2 ways about it. What will the average repugnant say? What will the average repugnant say to the fact that I TOLD THEM WITH FLAMES AND VITRIOL that the Bush administration was lying from the early last year!

I'll tell you what they will say.......


nothing.






posted on Jan, 29 2004 @ 02:25 AM
link   
Can we impeach the buffoon yet?



posted on Jan, 29 2004 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Now he's even denying that he said they ever had WMDs.


===============================
THE DAILY MIS-LEAD
daily.misleader.org...
===============================



BUSH'S WMD MISLEADING CONTINUES TO ESCALATE

Faced with evidence that no WMD existed in Iraq before the war, President
Bush is citing different rationales for going to war. He said this week that
the war was justified because "the world is a better place without Saddam
Hussein." The president's recent statements, however, are belied by what he's
said in the past. A look at the historical record shows President Bush
justified an invasion of Iraq by making unequivocal statements that Saddam
Hussein possessed WMD that threatened all Americans, even claiming that
inspectors had found WMD when they had not.

On November 23, 2002, President Bush said a war was justified because there
was "an urgent threat posed by Iraq whose dictator has already used weapons
of mass destruction to kill thousands." In early January 2003, President
Bush said, "The Iraqi regime is a threat to any American. They not only have
weapons of mass destruction, they used weapons of mass destruction...That's
why I say Iraq is a threat, a real threat." And in his speech announcing the
invasion, President Bush said the war was justified because Americans were
"living at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with
weapons of mass murder." None of these assertions have since been
substantiated.

The president and his advisers had been warned repeatedly in the fall of
2002 by the intelligence community, including the CIA and Defense
Intelligence Agency, that the WMD case was weak. However, ten days after the
war began, Secretary Rumsfeld asserted the U.S had pinpointed the location
of WMD, saying, "We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit
and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." Less than two months
later, President Bush went on television to claim that WMD had been found,
saying, "we found the weapons of mass destruction" - an assertion that was
false. Asked a follow-up question, the president again contended they'd been
found, saying, "For those who say we haven't found [them], they're wrong, we
found them." The statement has not been repeated since by the Administration
or supported by the Iraq Survey Group's months-long search for WMD.

Independent observers are speaking out about the administration's pre-war
assertions on Iraq versus the reality that's emerging. The respected
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace wrote that the administration
"systematically misrepresented the threat" from Iraqi weapons of mass
destruction. The Army War College called the war "unnecessary," and the
President's own Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board believes the White House
was so desperate "to grab onto something affirmative" to demonstrate Iraq's
weapons that it ignored intelligence reports undermining that claim.


I guess that he figures that, lies got him in to this, lies will get him out. What an ass.



posted on Jan, 29 2004 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Anybody that votes for this guy is an idiot.


I agree. They lied from the begining, and the media let them get away with it. I dont think nothing will come out of this.



posted on Jan, 29 2004 @ 10:42 PM
link   
Here's an interesting question:

Can anyone of you begin or bring about an impeachment process?
I thought not....




regards
seekerof



posted on Jan, 29 2004 @ 10:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
Here's an interesting question:

Can anyone of you begin or bring about an impeachment process?
I thought not....



No. But if I could........



posted on Jan, 29 2004 @ 11:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
Here's an interesting question:

Can anyone of you begin or bring about an impeachment process?
I thought not....


regards
seekerof


So are we admitting he's a liar Seek? We should all shut up cause we can't impeach him. Everyone give up stop pointing out his lies--we can't do anything about it. Oh wait, yes we can. He's losing this election. He needs a win bad. They better find bin Laden...or some WMD in Iraq. He needs some good news. This issue has got to go away quickly, and he can't talk it away no more than you can defend it.

The story has been running 24 hours a day ever since Kay dropped it. Folk are calling for another independant investigation. I don't know if anyone is counting but that makes three for this administration. He needs to stop the bleeding.



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 10:30 AM
link   
If Bush could be impeached, he already would have been. I remember when he said Iraq was an imminent threat, and I think he was right. If any of you listened to Kay when he was being interviewed by Brokaw you'd know what I mean. And if you still have any doubts, you are totally blind.

Kay never said there were no WMD, and he never said Iraq wan't dangerous.



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 02:17 PM
link   
Why doesen't this stuff STICK to him.

Now I hear he's blaming Colin Powell for "Misleading him".


He can get out of ANYTHING!!!!



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tesla
Why doesen't this stuff STICK to him.

Now I hear he's blaming Colin Powell for "Misleading him".


He can get out of ANYTHING!!!!


He's blaming Powell! This is ridiculous. This man is like a child! He never accepts repsonsibility for anything! I KNEW Iraq wasn't an imminent threat long before this. It just didn't make sense. Now, that we ACTUALLY know, he wants to blame Powell---who was probablyagainst the whole thing from the start!

I hate Bush!



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by joehayner
If Bush could be impeached, he already would have been. I remember when he said Iraq was an imminent threat, and I think he was right. If any of you listened to Kay when he was being interviewed by Brokaw you'd know what I mean. And if you still have any doubts, you are totally blind.

Kay never said there were no WMD, and he never said Iraq wan't dangerous.


- 280,000 bombing sorties flown over Iraq from GWI to present day prior to the latest hostilities.
- A Third World Army when we decimated them in GWI....it never regrouped
- chem & bio weapons = no more than any other 3rd World military, and significantly less than many.
- No link to Al Qeida

So how were they an imment threat?

IMPEACHMENT:

Is it lost on you folks that there's a Republican majority in both houses of Congress? And the Supreme Court?

But, we are trying:
Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General during the Johnson Administration has drafted articles of impeachment setting forth high crimes and misdemeanors by President Bush and other civil officers of his administration.
www.votetoimpeach.org...

Here's the site where you all can help push the process

www.votetoimpeach.org...



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
Here's an interesting question:

Can anyone of you begin or bring about an impeachment process?
I thought not....



Well, my dad as an international law professor can, and is going to...he was also working with others on impeaching bush sr. in the past. It is a longshot, but no shame in trying.



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Tesla
Why doesen't this stuff STICK to him.

Now I hear he's blaming Colin Powell for "Misleading him".


He can get out of ANYTHING!!!!


He's blaming Powell! This is ridiculous. This man is like a child! He never accepts repsonsibility for anything! I KNEW Iraq wasn't an imminent threat long before this. It just didn't make sense. Now, that we ACTUALLY know, he wants to blame Powell---who was probablyagainst the whole thing from the start!

I hate Bush!


Colonel,

You know Bush is doing this to save his reputation and so he can make sure that everyone who likes him votes for him in the next election.



posted on Jan, 30 2004 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Of course, I knew this. But, the tide is turning, I was at the bookstore picking up "The Price of Loyalty" today and what book did I see glariing out in front of me? A book called, "FRAUD," in bright red wacross a picture of Bush. The tide is turning. Instead of all those books about how a hero Bush is, the truth of his evil and scamming is coming out in droves.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join