It's an interesting point you make Sauras. And if we add Gerald Bull in as well and the many years of combat experience the SDF has, they would be
no push over in a conventional land based campaign.
I fully accept they have or had some of the leading bioweapons developers, but did South African govermnents put these weapons in their armoury or
just develop for other countries and get hard currency in return.
I suspect the vast majority of the weapons development was done during White rule of South Africa, and they would have exploited any opportunity to
earn hard currency. There is even talk that South Africa and Israel worked together on a nuclear weapon.
There are, in my mind, two questions.
1) Do the SDF have any bio or nuclear weapons in their armoury?
2) If push came to shove, would they use?
General Sir John Hackett's "The Untold Story" about World War 3 does have a chapter on operations in Southern Africa.
How involved South Africa might be in a third world war, is just as interesting, and I can not see WW3 starting in or as result of anything South
Africa might do. South Africa, because of it importance as base for Naval operations and its resources would become a vital area as WW3
progresses.
I did mention South Africa being neutral in my last post. Now I come to think about it more, I see this as very unlikely as both sides in WW3 would
want South Africa as a base for operations and to ensure the resources the country has to offer are available.
I could see as WW3 moves on, South Africa becoming a target for both sides once access to oil has been secured, so South Africa would I fear have to
pick a side.
Starting this thread, the OP mentioned that South Africa was a small/weak country. That depends on the threater. In Southern Africa, RSA is a major,
if not the dominant country because of its size, resources and it military. Even in the whole of Africa, RSA is still an important player.
Globally, I do not think that South Africa is weak. There are vast resources that the rest of the world needs from South Africa which gives it a
differant kind of power to that of the US, which can project its power by shows of force.
On the question of Iran, South Africa has a public face, and would want to keep one of its customers happy, but in private, I suspect it is facing
huge pressure from the US, UK, and UN Atomic Weapons inspectors to reveal the extent of any deals with Iran. Again, the economic power that the US
can leverage is vast, and may work with the US and its allies in private for the greater good of all South Africans.


Check your facts 