What would happen to South Africa in the event of WW3????, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:38 AM by Kr0n0s
reply to post by LovingSoul





A strong nation? I get a big laugh when I read about these tiny, insignificant countries attempting to sound "strong" towards the USA.
Like a tiny ant walking up and saying, im strong and IF we even notice you down there, since your a tiny ant, your voice is so high pitched we cant hear you.
So we turn on the amplifiers for you, just in case you're saying something important and we hear "im strong and were selling stuff to iran"
What did you say again? "im strong" and we flick you away with a finger..

Worry about youre own criminal country before you worry about my country.
Why dont you do something about the Rape and Murders of the white farmers and their families first, then preach about my country..


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 07:17 AM by bg_socalif
Originally posted by Kr0n0s
reply to
post by LovingSoul


Worry about youre own criminal country before you worry about my country.
Why dont you do something about the Rape and Murders of the white farmers and their families first,


Along with the out of control spreading of HIV/AIDS infections.

Far more important than worrying about supplying uranium to Iran, IMO.


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 09:04 AM by Freedom ERP
I think your question Sethdarke, does not have a simple answer and depends on the extent of WW3.

Lets look at WW3 being conducted in Western Europe and the Middle East first off. And lets further assume it is a conventional war, then the major impact to South Africa would be the general ripple in the world economy and the disruption to the supply of goods around the world. South Africa would come up huge diplomatic pressure from all sides in the conflict and lets assume that a world war is unlikely not to involve the US and then by extention NATO.

So trade is very likely to dry up and lets faces it, if South Africa is seen by the US and its allies to be supplying weapons and minerals to help their enemies, the diplomatic pressure would be ratcheted up and then the US and its allies would make an example of a ship/plane delivering weapons.

South Africa would tow the line from the US and its Allies, or it would open itself to military attack. Yes the SDF is a well equiped and training army, but against an alliance that can protect power anywhere in the world, South Africa does not really stand a chance, and no leader wants to do down in history as the leader that caused their country to be destroyed.

There are still strong ties to the United Kingdon and the Commonwealth which would be used to put pressure on South Africa.


If we broaden the scope to include Africa as part of the battle ground, South Africa is one of the most powerful, well equiped and training militaries in Africa. I still would not see South Africa opposing the US and its allies unless it was very sure of support, and I do not think that Russia or China would be prepared to offer the level of support and commitment to South Africa for it to oppose the US and its allies.

South Africa would either be neutal or part of the US alliance.


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 09:17 AM by Kr0n0s
reply to post by African



You guys are only where you are and only have what you have because of England..
In my opinion it was once a great country, at least until the Mandela era, thats when they began their downhill descent.
Now S. Africa is considered to be a Nation to NOT go to, especially if youre white and want to stay free of HIV.
Seriously, thats what S.A. is now known for! HIV and white farmers being raped and slaughtered.
Now to add to that, they seem to want to be known for supplying a Nation known for Terrorism with uranium?

I would think that if we invade Iran because of their Nuclear issues then we would also attack any aircraft and board any ship that was supplying them.

Also, I can find that dump on a map as well as my 13 year old son.
All you have to look for is the Nation at the bottom of the Continent thats considered the *** -hole of the world.


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 09:22 AM by Cuhail
reply to post by Freedom ERP



THAT was the most intellegent response in this whole thread!

@ The Posters-
The issue is not whether the US can kick SA's arse, but, whether or not SA will or will not take up "space" in any WWIII-like conflict. You can bash America all you want, it makes no difference in the thread except to waste time reading it.
Cuhail


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 11:03 AM by Kr0n0s
reply to post by sethdarke



Lol, poor guy. I feel bad for him now. If hes desperate enough to join the Military to get out of SA then he must be pretty desperate..
Well, good luck to you.


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 12:09 PM by Kr0n0s
reply to post by sethdarke



Hey seth, give me an idea of what a typical day for a white person is like in that place..

The last thing I remember seeing about S. Africa was a video on liveleak of a white girl that was decapitated in the streets by blacks with machetes.

Every Nation that the blacks are given control of goes to hell, they do the same thing to American cities.
Oh wait, is that racist or is it reality?
Well there are even black leaders here in this country that say the same thing, of course the other blacks like the "Reverend" call them Uncle Toms..

If someone can name ONE successful Nation, in which Africans have always had and now have total control of, then I will gladly eat my words.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 3 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags