It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hey lurkers! After browsing through alt.revisionism posts for awhile, you may already have figured out how to become a Holocaust revisionist. It's easy. For those of you considering such a move, be assured that it requires no preparation or scholarly research. Simply follow the guidelines below, as the revisionists on this newsgroup have done, and you'll quickly be on the road to deluding yourself that someone out there takes you seriously, and that you are valiantly fighting the evil forces of some undefined, implausible conspiracy.
[//quote]
9. Kafka Was Here -- Argue that the gas chambers never existed because there are no photos or drawings of them. When you are presented with photos and drawings, state that they could not possibly be actual photos/drawings of gas chambers because the gas chambers never existed because there are no photos/drawings of them because they never existed because . . .
Halocost never happened
and yet...That comment also deserves a :shk:
Originally posted by REVELATOR
I've heard it said that in war the victors write the history. It's why WW2 historians who don't accept the Orthodox Holoco$t Version are denigrated as "revisionists". There is no list of 6 million dead Jews. Germany did not even have available the amount of petrol required to cremate even 1 million corpses weighing 100 pounds each.
Originally posted by glee
2. The ability of IQ tests used in our schools to predict academic success is pretty good. But there are many problems with IQ tests. For one thing, they were originally culturally biased, and some remain so. Questions in the original tests were sometimes based on experiences confined to the middle or upper class.
The question of intelligence is much more complex than people realize.
Originally posted by shoo
You just miss the point that there are some people left who have actually been in Germany during the WW2 and know what really happened.
But I guess my ancestors lied to me for fun because they were paid by Jews? And one of my grandfathers kept 2 jews hidden just for fun.
Originally posted by REVELATOR
After much research, discussion with relatives of survivors and critical thinking I've personally concluded:
the Orthodox HolocoSt Version is an exageration of wartime events which in the years after WW2 was and is increasingly been used to fleece Germany to finance the creation and security of the Zionist state in Palestine.
One day in a less totalitarian political climate students of this period will learn the truth regarding the number of Jewish dead.
From 1938-1945 and including disease, old age and outright murder, the number of Jews that died in the countries controlled or occupied by the IIIrd Reich was about 450,000.
Originally posted by Djarums
Since I'm still in a welcoming mood I feel that I should, in a friendly way, suggest that you not ever refer to the event as "Holoco$t" again.
Originally posted by REVELATOR
And since I'm only interested in reality and facts, I'd suggest you stop using capitals when refering to the event that appears to me to be an extortion racket. When you refer to it as "The Holocost" it tends to deify something that was horrible no matter how you slice it. I'll agree to stop using Holoco$t, but only on this forum, if you'll stop using caps.
Originally posted by REVELATOR
I'll let you begin by allowing you to define the facts that are up for debate.
For instance, if you say, "prove to me 6 million didn't die", and I'll say "what do you base your belief in the accuracy of this number on?"
and we'll be off and running.
I'll be back tomorrow looking for you're bones of contention.
As far as labeling revisionism as anti-semitism, it is logically possible that some truths are anti-semitic, agreed?