It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Nohup, but how would that be regulated?
Originally posted by Gorman91
Depopulation = Nazism regime.
Pro population = Moral Obligation to help the whole.
Originally posted by Steff
The heaadline alone is quite frightening......I imagine that is something Hitler was thinking in the lines of......One might agree with the question asked, but the only reasonable answer is.......If mother nature itself solves the problem.
Originally posted by Nohup
Originally posted by Steff
The heaadline alone is quite frightening......I imagine that is something Hitler was thinking in the lines of......One might agree with the question asked, but the only reasonable answer is.......If mother nature itself solves the problem.
Fine. Here's Mother Nature's usual solution:
Maybe we can do a little better.
[edit on 31-10-2007 by Nohup]
Originally posted by Nohup
Originally posted by Steff
The heaadline alone is quite frightening......I imagine that is something Hitler was thinking in the lines of......One might agree with the question asked, but the only reasonable answer is.......If mother nature itself solves the problem.
Fine. Here's Mother Nature's usual solution:
Maybe we can do a little better.
[edit on 31-10-2007 by Nohup]
Originally posted by DeadFlagBlues
I'm a huge proponent of a humane human eugenics program. My first thread was about population control with some very good points on both sides. Even though we're coming to a "plateau" in the industrialized nations, we're seeing spikes in third world nations. I think there needs to be a drastic cut in both existing population and population growth regardless of where it is. The 200-300 million proposed by Ted Turner sounds about right. It would be selfish and ignorant to think otherwise.
Originally posted by Kruel
What I would suggest is setting aside an island, or a country... or maybe even underground or on the moon. Somewhere shielded from the rest of society. In order for people to live there, they would have to agree to a certain set of rules. 2 children per couple would be one of the rules. If they don't like it, they'd have to live with the rest of the population... which will no doubt be reduced eventually by mother nature, war, or famine.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Depopulation = Nazism regime.
Pro population = Moral Obligation to help the whole.
Originally posted by earthman4
We could have a colony on Mars by now, with an atmosphere almost fit to breath. We just have not done it. We have room for us on other planets.
Originally posted by anti72
DeadFlagBlues:
´´Depopulation is necessary. ´´
´´Yes, killing billions of people would be bad. ´´
well ..very intelligent..
Originally posted by earthman4
We could have a colony on Mars by now, with an atmosphere almost fit to breath. We just have not done it. We have room for us on other planets.