END The Alex Jones GAME, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 12:00 AM by talisman
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



METHOD OF COINTELPRO
en.wikipedia.org...



1. "Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents." [4]


As for ABC shutting him down, how can you verify this statement? That would just cause more suspicion. I don't think they can do this.

Again, the story of 700 dollars doesn't work when you factor in that he allows his work to go online for free.


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 12:09 AM by enigmania
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



Originally posted by enigmania
If they want the Vatican to stay out of the picture, wouldn't it be better for them to have AJ not saying anything about any conspiracy at all?


No, because if he wasn't mentioning any conspiracy at all, what's the point in having him be a disinformation agent conspiracy theorist?

-Jeah hello! What's the point? That's my whole point!



Originally posted by enigmania
And maybe he doesn't link things to the Vatican cause he is a christian himself, and maybe he as a person isn't ready for the implications.


That was just mentioned, and as I said before, if that is the case, and he means no ill intent, and he is who he says he is, then that is bias and ignorance to ignore these things simply because of christian faith.

-What about the other thing I said about he might be afraid to put of the christian public if he links to the Vatican.? Seems pretty wise to me, what does it matter? If people just wake up to the fact that their gov is corrupt, we've already come a long way.


Originally posted by enigmania
how could they possibly gain by that amount of exposure of their society?


Well, let's put it this way..

What damage has been done to them for this "exposure"?

They're still in control, they're still getting their way, they're still passing their laws, they're still having their wars.

The plan is still on track.


-This is the kind off backward logic that makes you lose all the credibility you had in my eyes. You have a good day now.


[edit on 28-10-2007 by enigmania]



reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 12:09 AM by NovusOrdoMundi
Originally posted by talisman
METHOD OF COINTELPRO
en.wikipedia.org...


I'll ask again:

Don't you think a smart disinformation agent would do the opposites of what people think a disinformation agent would do to avoid suspicion?

Originally posted by talisman
As for ABC shutting him down, how can you verify this statement?


That they can easily shut him down?

It's their satellites. They can shut him down.

Yes, he could probably find other satellites, but he'd be down for a little bit.

Originally posted by talisman
That would just cause more suspicion. I don't think they can do this.


Why? They censor Ron Paul. That's raised suspicion. Clearly they don't care.

Originally posted by talisman
Again, the story of 700 dollars doesn't work when you factor in that he allows his work to go online for free.


I'm sorry, but that makes absolutely no sense to me. His movies being online for free really has nothing to do with him selling this guy out.

It's worth re-mentioning, this situation with John Gray was back in 2000. He wasn't near as big as he is now, so he didn't have near as much money, and his videos didn't have the popularity they do now. Plus, viewing videos on the Internet then, and viewing them on the Internet now - night and day. And that's going on the assumption that videos on the Internet were even possible in 2000. I don't know if they were or not.


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 12:27 AM by talisman
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



By calling out other people on disinfo you sow the seed of doubt. That works much more then bothering with doing what people might not expect. For a very simple reason. You hit them right in their hearts. Doubt is very powerful.

Now if you want to assume that Disinfo Agents wouldn't call others disinfo so no one would suspect them, then you have just left the real 'TRUTH' people unscathed. In other words, say Alex Jones is Disinfo, but he won't rat anyone else who is not. Well now he basically would be giving the enemy a free ride~!

Sure being deceptive can work. But you might end up deceiving yourself in the process But a fight is a fight is a fight. If the other is the enemy at some point you must engage if the enemy is winning and gaining.


As for ABC, again. Just because they own the sateliites you think they can do what they want? Well this contradicts your own idea of being 'deceptive' as to not raise suspicion. Perhaps ABC can't because it will draw more suspicion then they want. Perhaps they don't give a care. They don't believe a word he says.

This all depends on how you look at this.


[edit on 28-10-2007 by talisman]


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 12:52 AM by enigmania
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



It's backward logic cause the fact that they're still running things, doesn't mean that AJ isn't doing them any damage. A lot of people that didn't know about the NWO, now know about it, because of Alex Jones. What hidden purpose has AJ to them, that warrants him , at the same time, to wake people up to NWO existance?

Do you deny that he brings a lot of things that are true to the public eye? If he works for them, why would they let him say all these things that are true,things that people otherwise might not have ever known about. What piece of disinfo he might bring would weigh up to that?

And please, I know you respond with this backward logic on purpose just to throw people of guard. I don't believe you're actually stupid enough that you didn't get my point the first time.


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 02:21 AM by Unplugged
Originally posted by talisman
METHOD OF COINTELPRO
en.wikipedia.org...



1. "Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents." [4]


As for ABC shutting him down, how can you verify this statement? That would just cause more suspicion. I don't think they can do this.

Again, the story of 700 dollars doesn't work when you factor in that he allows his work to go online for free.


I was about to post something like this, good one. As for the supposed "inconsistencies" with Alex Jones, they are minor and his body of work clearly indicates where he stands. I would question the credibility of anyone calling Alex Jones a "disinfo" agent as strongly a the OP. I think the OP is clearly trying to make something out of nothing and simply smear Jones, Counter Intelligence agent style. Look at his username for #### sake.


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 02:47 AM by Scalamander
After reading through this post and doing research on AJ I think that there is a facet of information many of the people here are missing. If you were the government and you realized that there was a movement to expose the truth, would you start planting disinfo agents to lead the chase astray? You could and I have no doubt that it has been done, but its really only a stop-gap measure.

Firstly you still have this truth movement and even with your agents in place, people will still be getting information from other places. You also run the chance that your agents will be exposed. Maybe you have more but once one agent is found out then it gets easier to identify the others.

What if you used your agents to simply find the leaks and establish which members of the populace seemed to come into the most amounts of confidential information or the most correct theories. Once this person or persons has been found then I would begin feeding him false information. Of course it would have to be couched with real truth so as not to tip the person off. But once this is set up you can have a person who truly believe in the Truth Movement, but has been unknowingly compromised and feed doctored information.

As someone who has a little experience when it comes to matters like this, I think that these practices would be commonplace and much more effective then simply using disinformation. Is Alex Jones a disinformation agent or simply manipulated? Since one of the most important things to a sanctioned disinfo agent is anonymity I would think it unlikely that Alex Jones is one. Whether his sources have been compromised and manipulated is yet to proven but is in my mind much more likely.

We are dealing with an all pervasive big-brother society who has hundreds of schemes at hand for deflecting suspicion. They have their hands in a hundred pies and spin out so much conflicting information from both disinfo agents and manipulated real sources that it is impossible to discern what is real.

These words are no doubt being read and analyzed as I post them, but I still think it is worth it to at least put people here into the frame of mind where they can discern what the real best action for the government is and counter accordingly.

Remember, question everything. Alex Jones could be just another one of us, even though he may think differently. As for the rest of you with inside links or connections, I would advise you to look into them as well. After all, you post on the internet and you will get someones attention. Who knows what new schemes are being implemented to derail our thought processes?


reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 04:34 AM by Edgar2
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
reply to
post by Copernicus



Two websites on the Vatican stuff:

VaticanAssassins.org
SpirtuallySmart.com

Now, before someone bashes my credibility because of these websites, I by no means endorse or believe everything on these websites. There are things that are over reactions, there are things that are lies, but there are things that can be verified on other websites.

So again, not everything on there is fact.



It looks like you got most of your information from the website you later post as having lies in it. I went to the spirituallysmart.com and found this www.spirituallysmart.com...

It has way more info on Jones than what you posted above. but then you link to some myspace page to give someone credit for the info? on top of that when I looked at the myspace page it was private. some source. the spirituallysmart.com web site is a much stronger source. what lies on that page are you talking about? It looks good to me.



reply posted on 28-10-2007 @ 05:03 AM by Edgar2
Originally posted by CPYKOmega
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

Alex Jones is nothing but the average guy who wants to expose the truth. He started out as a smalltime radio/tv host and has become a popular media figure because people are starting to wake from their slumbers.

I agree with talisman.... the author of this thread smells like disinfo agent to me.


How do you know the "true" Alex jones story? Points are being made on this board regarding Alex Jones' credibility. Jones' is historically bankrupt with his theories. Catholicism and Fascism have always walked hand in hand. Check out some of these links:
Red Mass
Blue Mass
Nazi Jesuits
Jesuit Holocaust
Picture Positive
Alberto Rivera

Why doesnt Jones talk about this? It looks like all these fascist dictators all had one thing in common. A close friendship with the Vatican. Yet Jones calls them "Globalists, elitists, illuminati" etc etc. Seems like hogwash. like he's protecting the richest organization on earth perhaps? His sister then attends one of their "fine institutions" as Alex put it. Jones then states that a senior at St Edwards runs his Sunday program. Then you think Alex would be truthful about the Vatican and Jesuits? sounds like partiality at the least to me. In the middle compromise and at the most Sold Out. Check this out youtube.com...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nibiru Video Explains It All (Conspiracy)
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Mark Dice calls out Alex Jones
  Posted 7 days ago with 5 member flags
Any radio operator notice very sharp increase in testing the EBS
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
what I think about how bad our wolrd is.
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags
Hollywood finds one more way to shove Nazis up our ... noses!
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags
The spirit of JESUS is here!
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 117 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 42 replies