It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


VIDEO: 911 Mysteries, Part 1: Demolitions

page: 4
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 28 2007 @ 03:29 PM
I saw this around 14months ago... i thought it was a very interesting video. It was the first time i genuinely thought that it could have been a pre-planned 'disaster'. Things like WTC7, squibs and the basement sliced beams are what really turned it for me.

My girlfriend who laughs at me when i talk my conspiracy stuff (not really, she normally humours me and listens lol), changed her ideas of conspiracy theories after she watched this video. She believes it more than me lol...

posted on Oct, 28 2007 @ 11:57 PM
these videos never win me over. i think any movie like this is a slap to the face of the people that actually worked on the disaster scenes of 9/11 and the folks working the cases of 9/11. oh well, its over and done with and we can make a million assumptions on why it went down. guess nobody is going to give credit to the Phillipino FBI and Intellegence that warned the U.S that there were plots to crash planes into the twin towers. never hear anyone mention this on this site. i truly believe 9/11 could of been stopped if we took the PI warning serously but we simply said there was not enough evidence to take action. so theres the conspiracy! we did not act fast enough. wether some want to believe that Bush knew of this intell is another story. i honestly dont think the president is informed about every plot out there. beraucracy always gets in the way!

posted on Oct, 29 2007 @ 07:05 AM
Good stuff. Its nice to see more then one side of this event.

I am not an expert by anY means, I was trapped in Hong Kong during 911 and for 7 days lived in my hotel room watching the TV.

I always wondered why the building tops did not just fall to the ground. It was always just a thought. Watching them turn to dust over and over just did not seem real.

Anyway excellent job..cant wait for part 2.


posted on Oct, 29 2007 @ 01:25 PM
Well a couple of things comes to mind about 9/11. First I knew it was an inside job the moment it happened and that was based on prior knowledge from over 20 years ago.

Lets say it was really the jets, then why the freefall and implosion ? Why were the people inside on a shut down weeks prior? Who were they and have we got there account of what they did? Are they aware of their actions and will they come forward to clear up their involvement? What about the four Isreali Police all ready set up to film the attack?

If we don't question this and find the truth but just accept what the "officials" say then aren't we giving up or authority as citizens and our right to question our government to keep them honest and us free?

Does not the military oath say to protect the Constitution from all enemies, foriegn and domestic?

Abraham Lincoln warned our enemy would not come from across the sea, but from within. kennedy warned about a secret government.

We claim that if someone disagrees with the official account they are a conspiracy theorist. What is a conspiracy? Is it not the agreement of one or more people to do anything. To create this event could only have been done with the agreement of one or more people.

Many women are blindsided when a boyfriend or husband slips drugs into their luggage before a trip. these women are then accused not only of possession, but conspiracy. So without knowledge they are accused, but we dis anyone who claims the same against our public officials.

Why do we fear standing up to them? What will happen if it was an inside job, will we press charges? If we can not properly investigate this, how can we prevent it from happening again?

Some say that United 93 was bomb not a plane, so where are the people? I want answers, if we are headed to a new nazi experience I want to know how to protect my children.
I know about the concentration camps recently built on American soil, and the numerous foriegn troops. How many will it be ok to kill before we say stop? What will we do then, will anyone in the world care or come to our aid?

We have been warning you for over 20 years, when will it be time to do something real?

posted on Oct, 29 2007 @ 05:46 PM
I have always believe from the very minute it happen, that this was done by our own government. Not necessary President Bush but put into plan before he became President. For instance during the 1993 when Clinton was in office. When a truck went into it.

I believe those in power planted the controlled explosives then.

These towers fell way too controlled. Just like it was planned. A perfect collapse. Of course this is just my opinion.

It was too perfect of a fall to be anything but controlled.

posted on Oct, 31 2007 @ 05:05 PM
Psyops and the disinformation campaign is always evolving, staying a step ahead of the public consciousness. We must be looking forward at how they will spin the disaster of 9/11 Iraq and the Bush agenda to continue the family control.

Bush and the Neocons will wrap their arms around the PR failure that was 9/11 and the Iraq war, then they will fly away. Meanwhile everyone will celebrate as another family member is crowned the next American monarch, Hillary Clinton. Look for the next step, how will they control the sways of the masses to continue their agenda.

The Corporate/elite/family connections must be challenged on all sides. Expose the lies.

Article on Silverstein's man who is rebuilding WTC, John Lieber.

Who is a former Clinton administration official.

But it was Lieber's job in the Clinton administration from 1994 to 1998 that best prepared him for his role with Silverstein. As an assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Lieber was Clinton's point man as Congress rewrote the blueprint dictating how billions in federal transportation funds would be doled out

How many other things can we see that we must continue to expose. Media corruption and propaganda, The promoting of single candidates by party family officials. Even Internet corruption, slanted searches, youtube censorship. use your peripheral vision and stop the control of information from leading us along managed paths to submission.

Great Video,

On a side note, I find it ironic that one of the witnesses said he would not open the door to the "34" floor. Anyone else see this as ironic? The hidden 34th degree

posted on Oct, 31 2007 @ 07:32 PM
When I first saw the demolitions of the WTC I had been experienced with demolition videos and knew what to look for. I thought to my self "who set off the charges?" How can the people of America be so blind? Our government is out to destroy our nation.

posted on Nov, 1 2007 @ 11:11 AM
As claimed in the first post by SkepticOverlord himself,
This is the film that might actually reach out to mainstream America.
No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and "mysteries."

So I started VIDEO: 911 Mysteries, Part 1: Demolitions
And bang, the film wasn’t even started of the outcome was already set.
Mister Brad the conservative republican makes his assumption as clear fact, he find himself a sort of demolition hobbyist who claims in the first minute already that the so called footage “Painful Deceptions” is wrong.

Is this then a film with no agenda?
Is this then No finger-pointing?

Than he is saying that he watched carefully the footage of CBS, PBS nova, and the Nod Day brothers, the so called official video’s, and in the mean time researching thousands of websites and archives on the internet and therefore not sleeping for a week, he realised that the official story, not [air cuts mend??] “Painful Deceptions” was improvable, unsubstantiated, absolutely wrong.
There you go again, the official story is not provable, unsubstantiated, absolutely wrong.
But the footage of “Painful Deceptions” is.

I ask you, is there anyone on ATS who is capable to look at some DvD's and thousands of websites and archives in one week and come to a solid conclusion?

Well what can I further say about this, I will look them all, but I have already a very creepy feeling.

But maybe that’s because I am a Dutchmen.

posted on Nov, 2 2007 @ 01:03 AM
your a bloody legend S.O.

i'd give you an applause, but im not a moderator yet and i can see your not in need of any extra points

thanks very much for the videos.

[edit on 2/11/07 by Obliv_au]

[edit on 2/11/07 by Obliv_au]

posted on Nov, 2 2007 @ 09:00 AM
Things that I find personally very strange in VIDEO: 911 Mysteries, Part 1and Part two, I didn’t see the rest yet.
I must say first, that the sweet voice of the woman in the videos is very well chosen.
And I have also mister Brad, the conservative republican, already mentioned in this reply.

reply to post by spacevisitor

Well, here we go,

It’s a bright clear sunny day right?
Look at the second plane before it hits WTC2 .at 02:03 and again at 02:54 of the video.

1. Why is this plane the Boeing 767 so colourless, why is there absolute no reflection of the sunlight at all, even when the sun is at the right of the plane, but all you see is just a gun paint colour. In reality it must look more like the plain at 05:01 of the video, especially in the sunlight.

2. Again what is the big cylinder thing just between the wings next to the right wing?

3. Then the witness with the base ball pet, at 03:18 knew from moment one, as he stated at the reporter of FOX News Alert, that both towers where collapsed because such building mostly due by structural failure? Is this an clear example of a disinformer in action?? Because, how can he know that as a fact, immediately after the collapse.

4. Frank A. De Martini, manager WTC construction and project management, say the buildings where designed to have u fully loaded 707 crashed into it, but could resist even multiple planes. Later the sweet voice of the woman said, imagine, building expressly for airplane impact, but never thinking of the fuel?

Then part two,

The witness Lyn Simpson at 08:20 of the video who was on the 89ste floor of the North tower and clearly saw as she stated, that when the South tower collapsed at 09.59.04, she saw the floors falling one by one on each other, as it pan caked.
So, she was still at the same time on the 89th floor in the also burning North tower, in an terrible dangerous situation, not in panic, not run for her live to safety, but look outside to see the South tower collapse.
Is that not very strange?

Then this,
because the South tower plane impact was between the 78th to 84th floor, in a lower position as she was on the 89th floor, how can she see these details despite the situation of herself, despite the smoke, the huge cloud of dust and falling debris?
Is this really possible?

Then this,
The South tower collapsed at 09.59.04 and in less then halve an hour later, her own tower at 10.26.31.
How did she managed to bring herself in safety in that situation in less then halve an hour ?
Is this really possible?

posted on Nov, 2 2007 @ 07:10 PM
Great vid, very revealing, I too was particularly swayed by the squibs and the perfectly cut steel supports - it all looks too neat and controlled.

[edit on 2-11-2007 by DragonsDomain]

posted on Nov, 6 2007 @ 04:37 PM
I've decided to surf around for other similar videos,then I found this video=Sc rew 9/11 Mysteries
Its purpose is to counter the 9/11 Mysteries video.
Now I wonder if anybody can debunk this one?

Note:I did not see the whole video yet & for some reason I can't embed the video here.

[edit on 6-11-2007 by tormentor]

posted on Nov, 8 2007 @ 12:35 PM

Originally posted by tormentor
I've decided to surf around for other similar videos,then I found this video=Sc rew 9/11 Mysteries
Its purpose is to counter the 9/11 Mysteries video.
Now I wonder if anybody can debunk this one?

Note:I did not see the whole video yet & for some reason I can't embed the video here.

[edit on 6-11-2007 by tormentor]

I never saw this before. I just sat through all 2hrs 35 mins of it, and it's in every way excellent.

The first time I saw the 'Loose Change' video it was obvious to me that it was at the very least heavily biased, selective and propagandizing, contradicted its own propositions every few minutes and blatantly lied in several parts. I have to admit also that the poor editing and irritating music soundtrack (O Fortuna for God's sake) makes it very difficult to stick with, but I managed it. It was so bad that it almost made me believe the 'official version' of 9/11 on its own.

The link you have posted really is a fine expose, by people who obviously know their stuff. No-one who understands anything about how real CDs are carried out, or anything about thermite and how it works, could possibly think they were used at WTC. You'd have to take a decision to be willfully self-deluded and choose to ignore plain evidence. Still, people do.

Thanks again for the link. I would recommend anyone interested in better understanding the truth about 9/11 to invest a couple of hours and watch it. You have to engage your brain and reason, though, and leave your Conspiracy-Theory Belief-System to one side, if you can.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 07:46 AM
very heavy many times do i have to hear echos and repeating of a word in this thing...its so dramatic that im put off watching it...dial down the sasafras, sparky

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:24 PM
Nice work! Cool video.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 09:34 AM
At least ATS lets you have an opinion. I have posted videos at YouTube questioning the 911 tragedy and it has resulted in my being banned from You tube's site, all because I posted videos that they considered "subversive" in opinion, that I didn't buy the official story and and was raising questions that were logical and unanswered. I find this appauling and cowardly, but what am I supposed to expect from a company owned by Rupert Murdoch, who is comfortably in bed with the Bushies and lash out to silence any questions regarding 911 or the resulting aftermath. Go to You tube and watch my Ring of power postings regarding 911 and the Bilderbergs, the Queen and the Pope. They now consider this type of information thought crimes and will act to see you banned from displaying it publicly. They will also ban you from having discussion or discourse with like minded people who would possibly spread the word about it. What have we become?

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 03:52 PM
reply to post by Brawk

Well, that sucks, I definately believe there is censorhip, but what about the 1000's of other videos about those subjects on youtube that weren't removed or banned?

[edit on 10/1/08 by enigmania]

posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 10:32 PM
reply to post by spiritwomyn

it ain't necessarily so...
the four 'Israeli' police could have been a red herring
these 911 perpetrator scum are professionals
I figure you only see what they want you to see
unless you dig.

posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 02:59 AM

posted on Mar, 24 2008 @ 10:16 AM
Great job with the vid. It really raises some very alarming questions. It seems as though some of the scientists working on the official story didnt care about science at all. I guess they thought the general public wouldnt either. Again great vid I will recomend it to everyone I know.

top topics

<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in