reply to post by Leyla
OK, I fully understand your standpoint on this and it may well be unreasonable that this particular couple are being highlighted simply because they
are amongst the first to be affected by this law against discrimination. However, the law is not something which can be put aside just because
someone who wishes to discriminate against homosexuals is, in all other respects, a thoroughly nice person; after all there's hardly an armed robber
in history who wasn't kind to his mother and no one is suggesting that they should be forgiven for their nastier habits as a result.
The options here were really very limited. The adoption agencies of the Roman Catholic Church have already been forced to cease their activities
here because they would not place a child with a homosexual couple and so there was really very little other way in which this situation could end up.
The local authority will have asked their foster carers to sign up to new codes of practice to recognise the change in the law, (in order to protect
themselves from potential presecution), and they have refused so it's case closed.
It seems very sad but I really believe that's just something that is being overblown at the moment partly because there are those who wish to make
political capital out of the situation but also because this is a new cultural law which will take some time to be fully accepted.
As I said much earlier in the thread, if the fosterers had refused to educate the child about the equal rights of different races or sexes there would
be no fuss being made whatsoever about the fact that they are not fit to foster children and the law in the UK now treats discrimination against
homosexuals in exactly the same way.
Whether it should or not is an altogether different question.
[edit on 30-10-2007 by timeless test]