Foster child to be taken away because Christian couple refuse to teach him about homosexuality, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 08:26 AM by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by apc



BY APC "It's unfortunate that people keep turning to the Government to decide how to educate children about sex."


Are you sure its not the Government who are going ahead with their own legislation,rather than the people "turning to the gov?"

Thats what it feels like anyhow.


reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 01:19 PM by 1Crisis
reply to post by Silcone Synapse



Well.... I didn't mean right now. I meant exactly what you said. Eventually they'll learn about it whether or not it comes from the parents. My parents never talked to me about it.

At the same time though if this couple's religion is getting in the way of their childhood then maybe it's for the better?

Though it does seem to portray the government as being against Christianity. And again at the same time I feel like some people take their religion overboard. I wouldn't want children being brainwashed into being preachers and basing every life decision off of their strictly ruled religion.

All IMO.



reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 10:46 AM by Leyla
Originally posted by bodrul
reply to
post by timeless test



So in words you would rather have kids living in care centers,
then with people who refuse to teach homosexuality?

Since the only people that will suffer is the kids as they lose out on a home because of a stupid law.


This whole deal I think is stupid. And for once Bodrul and I actually see eye to eye...lol. (Shocker huh?)

Their not abusing the kids so why take them out? It makes no sense at all.
There are kids who needs a good homes and they pull out a child who isn't facing any harm and they pull them out because of a stupid law? What in the world is wrong with people nowadays- have they lost their minds?


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 11:47 AM by timeless test
reply to post by Leyla



OK, I fully understand your standpoint on this and it may well be unreasonable that this particular couple are being highlighted simply because they are amongst the first to be affected by this law against discrimination. However, the law is not something which can be put aside just because someone who wishes to discriminate against homosexuals is, in all other respects, a thoroughly nice person; after all there's hardly an armed robber in history who wasn't kind to his mother and no one is suggesting that they should be forgiven for their nastier habits as a result.

The options here were really very limited. The adoption agencies of the Roman Catholic Church have already been forced to cease their activities here because they would not place a child with a homosexual couple and so there was really very little other way in which this situation could end up. The local authority will have asked their foster carers to sign up to new codes of practice to recognise the change in the law, (in order to protect themselves from potential presecution), and they have refused so it's case closed.

It seems very sad but I really believe that's just something that is being overblown at the moment partly because there are those who wish to make political capital out of the situation but also because this is a new cultural law which will take some time to be fully accepted.

As I said much earlier in the thread, if the fosterers had refused to educate the child about the equal rights of different races or sexes there would be no fuss being made whatsoever about the fact that they are not fit to foster children and the law in the UK now treats discrimination against homosexuals in exactly the same way.

Whether it should or not is an altogether different question.




[edit on 30-10-2007 by timeless test]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 07:18 PM by PORCUPINEPIE
I have been watching this thread for a while now, and I didn’t think that I would respond, but I want to just share a personal view of the situation.


I was a foster parent from 1977-1978. We fostered only infants due to the number of bedrooms we had. We thought that we could make a difference in the lives of at least a couple of children. We were in Texas, and it was a long time ago, but as far as I can tell, things haven’t gotten any better, and perhaps they have worse than they were back then.

Our first was a 6 week old little girl that had been abandoned. They delivered her to me absolutely filthy, with lice to boot. After burning all the clothing she came with, delousing her, and bathing her we had a wonderful six weeks loving her, and considered adoption. As it seems to almost always be the case, the government came in, took her from us, and returned her to her mother, to continue the life she had had prior. Heart breaking for me and my family.

Next, they gave us a three month old little boy. He was clean, and no lice. He had been in the hospital for three weeks with a fractured skull and broken bones, and multiple bruises and abrasions. We had a heck of a time with this little guy. He was very fretful and cried everyday starting promptly at 5:00 PM. You guessed it, the same father that had physically abused him, had also gotten him addicted to some sort of drug to calm him when the father got home. He “couldn’t stand the kid crying all the time”.

In this case, the baby never should have been placed with us, because we were not educated at all about drug addicted cases. After 10 days of not being able to sooth this helpless infant, they came and got him, apologizing like mad for the error, and the problems it had caused US! Not a hint of remorse for the trauma that had been caused the innocent child. We learned later, that the baby was returned to the mother, and the father was awaiting trial for child abuse. (I have always wondered where mom was when all that abuse took place. But the agency felt fit to return him to the mother. Ya right!)

And our third little one was a nine month old girl. She was a case of neglect in the hygiene area, and had a horrible case of impetigo. She was covered with sores and the majority were severely infected. She came to us with medication and was clean. The first night, she woke up and of course I got up with her, I changed her diaper and saw a huge swelling across her little belly. I rocked and comforted her, and in about 1 ½ hours that swelling was gone, but her leg was then swollen. I had no idea of what was going on, or what could be wrong with her, but I immediately took her to the hospital. It was a severe reaction to the penicillin shot they had given her just prior to bringing her to us. She remained in the hospital for the next 10 days, until the penicillin had passed through her system. She was then released to her mother.

The point is if the government can’t address the emotional and physical needs of these children by sending them back to the problems they came from, why would they care what religious values are taught at the caregivers’ homes. There are far bigger problems to address here than the homosexual agenda.


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 03:50 AM by timeless test
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Who said that?


Grady,

The attitude that Christian beliefs should exempt you from, or allow you to opt out of the law is the essence of the complaint from the two fosterers concerned and whole thrust of the Daily Mail article which this thread reported.

For instance:

But Vincent and Pauline Matherick will this week have their latest foster son taken away because they have refused to sign new sexual equality regulations... ... To do so, they claim, would force them to promote homosexuality and go against their Christian faith

Mr Matherick added: "It's terrible that we've been forced into this corner. It just should not happen.

The Mathericks are planning to fight their case in the courts with the backing of the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship
The same organisation is backing Christian magistrate Andrew McClintock who resigned from the family courts in a row over gay adoption
He says he was forced to resign because he was not allowed to opt out of cases where he might have to send a child to live with gay parents.

all the above from - Daily Mail

In addition we have the adoption agencies of the Roman Catholic church.

Catholic adoption agencies will defy new anti-discrimination laws, the Church warned last night, as the row over allowing gay couples to adopt threatened to divide religion and politics. The argument was sparked by new equality laws being brought in by Westminster which would make it illegal to discriminate against anyone on the grounds of sexuality. This would include a Catholic adoption agency turning down a gay couple for adoption and has led to outcry among religious groups.

The Scotsman


That's who said it.



[edit on 31-10-2007 by timeless test]


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 10:05 AM by GradyPhilpott
reply to post by timeless test




They have the right to challenge the law, it appears, and they are abiding by the law in the mean time, even though they don't like it.

I will go further by saying that this is just another example of how the well-being of children in state's custody is sacrificed on the alter of political correctness.


[edit on 2007/10/31 by GradyPhilpott]


reply posted on 31-10-2007 @ 10:13 AM by timeless test
reply to post by GradyPhilpott



They certainly have the right to challenge the law - despite the fact that the intent of the law is clear and they have no desire to comply with it.

With regard to the well being of children, do you not think that would be well served by not being brought up by individuals or organisations who would encourage them to discriminate arbitrarily against certain social groups in our community?

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 16 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 1 days ago with 64 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 17 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 4 days ago with 24 member flags