World at peak oil output, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 24-10-2007 @ 12:52 PM by dbates

World at peak oil output


www.cnn.com
The world has reached the point of maximum oil output and production levels will halve by 2030 -- a situation that will eventually lead to war and disaster, a report claims.

The German-based Energy Watch Group released a report Tuesday saying the world's oil production peaked in 2006 and from now on will drop by around 3 percent a year. It says that by as early as 2030, the global availability of oil will be half of what it was at its peak.
(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
$100 Oil By Year End
The Oil Crisis of 2012?
Running out of oil faster than expected. War looms in the distance. zzzzz


reply posted on 25-10-2007 @ 02:32 AM by BitRaiser
reply to post by princeofpeace



Name one.
One proven technology that is capable of producing the same levels of energy that fossil fuels currently provide.

I mean besides Dylithium Crystals.



reply posted on 25-10-2007 @ 04:43 AM by BitRaiser
If you've read my posts on the topic of fearmongering, you should know that I'm normally very skeptical about any story that involves telling you to be afraid.

This is an exception.

Peak oil is something that we simply aren't fearful enough of.
This is one of the central issues that the media has been trying to divert our attention away from.

What you (and most people) don't understand is that electric cars aren't a solution. They are a step, but they don't solve anything on their own.

Where do you think electricity comes from?
Did you know that over 70% of US domestically produced electricity comes from burning fossil fuels? Less than 5% of current power production is from renewable sources (hydro, windfarms, solar, etc).
That means, when you charge your electric or hybrid car, you are still using fossil fuels to do it.

The majority of the energy that is currently lighting your room, running your computer, keeping your food refrigerated, and allowing for all your communications is coming from non-renewable sources. This isn't just about cars!

So what's needed is a shift over to more focus on renewable energy sources... and that's where things get scary. We currently CANNOT manufacture solar, wind, thermal, and hydro energy capture devices fast enough to keep up with growing demand. We just can't build them fast enough and there's NO work being done to expand production.

We are already too late.
Even if we were to make this a focused priority, we cannot currently replace our energy production facilities by the time fossil fuels become too expensive to be a viable resources. If nothing drastic is done, your electrical bill will likely be ten to twenty times higher in 10 years than it is today. $10 a litre for gas could become a reality (that would be ~ $30 a gallon, or $50 a gallon US by that time).

By all studies I've seen to date, the best we can do is to mitigate the impacts that this will have on all of us. We're going to have to accept the fact that we will face a lower standard of living simply because we've been irresponsible with our energy assets.

We're going to be paying more and getting less.


reply posted on 25-10-2007 @ 04:55 AM by DeadFlagBlues
reply to post by BitRaiser



I'm not saying that you're contributing to the fear mongering. I mean more articles telling us to be afraid of something. Saturn had a limited production model called the EV-1. 500 hundred were made and people were crazy about the car. They were confiscated by GM for unknown reasons. I think the major automobile corporations are slowing the mass production of alternative fuel cars but are confused about the response to private companies, such as MDI, Tesla Motor Company, Intergalactic Hydrogen .

I think the private industries will put too much pressure on the major motor manufacturers and leave them with no choice but to mass produce a alternative fuel cell vehicle. Look at all the controversy the Prius kicked up.


reply posted on 25-10-2007 @ 05:05 AM by xpert11
Originally posted by BitRaiser
This is an exception.


I agree even if there isnt a accurate time frame available. Even if oil doesn't dry I don't think it is a good idea to be energy depended on foreign oil and that is not to mention Saudi Arabia the regime where most of are oil comes from.



What you (and most people) don't understand is that electric cars aren't a solution. They are a step, but they don't solve anything on their own.


Well I said that Solar Powered cars have yet to enter the mainstream market place. I never said that electric cars are some kind of wonder fix.


Did you know that over 70% of US domestically produced electricity comes from burning fossil fuels? Less than 5% of current power production is from renewable sources (hydro, windfarms, solar, etc).


Well here in NZ a lot of our electricity comes from hydro dams of course you run into problems if you have a dry season.


That means, when you charge your electric or hybrid car, you are still using fossil fuels to do it.


The same sort of thing goes for the bio fuels made from corn you have to factor in the amount fertilizer the farmers use when growing the crop for example.



We just can't build them fast enough and there's NO work being done to expand production.


Well then it time to give another job to cheap labour in China.
Solar Power could be be more economical when it comes to power small remote rural areas. Otherwise Nuclear power is your friend.
How are these technology's spouse to go ahead when there biggest advocates are often hypercritical ?
I cant be the only one that has noticed how some environmentalists oppose the construction of the likes of wind farms!

We are already too late.


Well without an accurate time table there is no way of knowing if we are to late or not.



[edit on 25-10-2007 by xpert11]


reply posted on 25-10-2007 @ 05:26 AM by DeadFlagBlues
reply to post by xpert11



If you're talking to me, I was referring to Bitraiser saying that Electric power is bad for the environment.

I don't know, man... Check this out.
ELECTRIC FERRARI

I heard the new model does 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. My car is a 4 cylinder turbo that does it in 5.0 and nothing can really keep up. Wild.


reply posted on 25-10-2007 @ 03:33 PM by BitRaiser
reply to post by DeadFlagBlues



I'm very aware of the advances in Electric cars.
It's a good thing.

But what I'm saying is what's the point of going to electric cars when you are still burning fossil fuels to produce your electricity?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 6 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 17 hours ago, 166 replies
AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 9 hours ago, 80 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 10 hours ago, 58 replies
war hungry Iran
  Middle East Issues, Posted 16 hours ago, 41 replies