Police Catch Man Setting Fire In SoCal!!, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 23 times


reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 12:00 AM by makeitso
Originally posted by stompk
New Arrest!

Anthony Riperti - 45 - $250,000 in custody (maybe)
John Rund - 47 - $750,000 bond (confirmed)
New Arrest - 41 - ?
Dead Guy - 26 - not released


To add to your list;

Here is the name of the man who was killed by police. (See caption under image)

Here is the name of the alleged arsonist you were missing in your list.

In addition, here is a new arson arrest. Actually 2 but one is a juvenile, so they didn't release the name.


[edit on 10/26/07 by makeitso]



reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 12:42 AM by TheAgentNineteen
Originally posted by Copernicus
reply to
post by stompk



Its not weird... its Fox News. They dont let their employees talk about the truth...

This is a interesting story. Im starting to believe the fire was set.


Typical CNN liberal response to opposing views....


reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 05:27 AM by stompk
reply to post by makeitso



Makeitso, you are the hero of the day. Names are what we needed.

Check it out.

Russel Lane Daves, posted with picture. Looks military.

Then, the link you posted that claims the two captured?
they posted the adults name as Gogonio Nava.

But they show the same man's picture as the on for Russel Daves.

So the same guy has two names? Possible, but not under arrest.

Absolutely unbelievable.

And then they say, "well these people are not connected to the big fires because they only set small fires"

Um DUH!!! If they are caught, they put out the fire they set, so they didn't spread!!!

And for the comment about being a CNN liberal.

CNN didn't break this story, Fox did.

CNN makes a living on finding faults with the president.

This would be a problem, if they weren't right.

[edit on 26-10-2007 by stompk]


reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 05:31 AM by stompk
reply to post by starviego



Starviego, the problem with this theory are the foreign military are not barbarians, and I don't think would follow orders to hurt innoncent civilians,

Unless,

the was an uprising of the Californians because they found out our government was purposefully burning down their houses for NWO advancement.



reply posted on 26-10-2007 @ 09:28 AM by starviego
Originally posted by stompk
reply to
post by starviego


foreign military are not barbarians, and I don't think would follow orders to hurt innoncent civilians

Yeah, I'm sure the pilot of the Enola Gay thought that way too. That is a dangerously naive view of human nature. History is chock full of atrocities against non-combatants in wartime.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags