posted on Oct, 24 2007 @ 11:26 PM
I've watched the zeitgeist video. However, it only plays with similiarites and totally ignores the whole context of these religions. In order to
understand, one needs to read the whole context of the whole story rather than hand pick similar words or sentences to fit one's view. I can also do
that and pick two books and hand pick similar words and sentences and conclude that they have the same roots or origin where these 2 books have
totally different context and topic like architecture and archeology. They only thing similar is that they are made of paper. lol.
One thing for sure is that they have poor understanding of the word "Sun" and "Son". They errorneously conclude that the "Sun of god" is the
same as the "Son of God". The Sun is a spherical ball of plasma emitting enormous amounts of energy. The word "son" is a relationship issue. How
hilarious this is.
Obviously, from the Bible's point of view, regarding Jesus birthdate, nothing can be found. However, on these ancient religions, December 25 can be
found and was found out to be their deities birthdate, like Tammuz, Horus and the likes. No December 25 can ever be found in the Bible.
Another point, these pagan religions practices idol worshipping of graven images in which they bow down before it to burn incence and offer
sacrifices. The Bible forbids it as it is an abomination to God. You can see many ancient ruins like the Pyramids and in Asia - the Ankor Wat which
have huge statues of their gods. You can see these across all cultures of the world.
Another point, these pagan religions practices fortune telling, augury, magic arts, symbolism, supertitions, astrology, talking to the dead, and etc.
The Bible specifically forbids this.
Another point, all these pagan religions practices reptitive prayers. They chant and repeat prayer formulas infront of an idol or a religious statue.
These are guided by prayer or rosary beads in order for them to keep track how times they have repeated the prayer formulas. The Bible specifically
instructs us not to be like the heathen for they think that their many repetitive words will be heard.
Another point also, these pagan religions have mystical symbols like the ankh, the cross of Shamash, the sun, chi ro, runes, swastica, aum, and the
likes incorporated into their clothes, their prayer beads, their deity, their images, their icons and idols and their place of worship. In my
research, these symbols are vastly used in witchcraft practices. The Bible condones this.
Another point, last one, there are no archeological evidences which supports whatsoever how Jesus Christ looks like. The common images we see is that
Jesus is depicted as having long hair and having a nothern European facial attributes. First, Jesus was a Jew and it is forbidden for a Jew to have
long hair. Second, Jesus came from the middle east and he should have middle eastern features rather than nothern European features. Third, it is very
much forbidden in the Bible to depict God in the arts or stutues/idols made like in the form of a mortal man. Who's image is that, by the way?
So, the authors of Zeitgest and their likes fails to understand the context. They concentrate more and play the game of twister on similar words and
sentences, like "sun of god" and "Son of God" rather than the acual context for context comparison and the actual practice of these pagan
religions. It will be a vastly different thing if you compare the practices of true Christiany versus the practices of these pagan religions. You'll
see who is the odd man out.
These authors likes to play with words, twist it, distort the actual intended meanings rather than study the actual physical evidences and practices
of these heathen pagan religions.
Remember, evidences cannot be altered but words can. Be careful of just reading words that claims this or that if it cannot substantiate the
evidences.
[edit on 25-10-2007 by amitheone]