Proof that the pentagon didn't get hit by a boeing 757, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 17-7-2004 @ 10:57 AM by rwsdakota
Cruise missle specs:
Length: 18 feet 3 inches (5.56 meters); with booster: 20 feet 6 inches (6.25 meters)
Weight: 2,900 pounds (1,315.44 kg); 3,500 pounds (1,587.6 kg) with booster
Diameter: 20.4 inches (51.81 cm)
Wing Span: 8 feet 9 inches (2.67 meters)
Speed: Subsonic - about 550 mph (880 km/h)



757 specs:

Overall length: 155 feet, 3 inches
Wingspan: 124 feet, 10 inches
Maximum speed: 402 mph
Weight: 126,250 lbs. (empty)
Fuel capacity: 9,370 gallons


Do you seriously think people driving on the highway, people walking around the area of the pentagon, mistaken a 20ft cruise missle from a 155ft plane painted up as a plane?

Also, pics and video from a pentagon guardhouse clearly show.. A PLANE A PLANE!!



Al la plane!



As for the damage to the pentagon being so small (in comparison to what it should be).. watch the videos (try google.com) you'll clearly see the plane hits the ground slightly before hitting the pentagon...


guardian.250free.com...

[edit on 17-7-2004 by rwsdakota]

[edit on 17-7-2004 by rwsdakota]



reply posted on 17-7-2004 @ 11:11 AM by koji_K
Originally posted by sniper068
President Bush couldn't have prevented nor was he responsible. No president wants something like this hanging over his presidency. To think he played a roll is absolutly ludicrous. It would be more concievable that the democrats had played a role, discredit President Bush. That has been there primary objective since Jan 2001. They have sought to destroy all he has set out to accomplish, for the good of the economy or the American people.

Because of bill clinton and the democratic party President Bush was thrust into this most difficult war. It is unlike any war we have fought, the enemy is unlike any we have every faced and the battlefield is all around us. This is the war the democrats new was inevitable and for 8 years they failed America. President Bush did as is doing what should have been done by the last administration. To blame him is to call yourself a coward, for you would have chosen the clinton way.


richard clarke presented the incoming bush administration with a plan to 'roll back al-qaeda', listing it as a national security priority. bush, with condi rice, threw the plan out rather than implement it. clinton made an attempt to kill osama bin laden. bush did nothing before 9/11. in fact, the ashcroft memos seems to show that he wanted to make sure terror was given a much lower priority than did the clinton administration.

you claim that bush couldnt have had anything to do with 9/11. maybe that's true. i agree that no president wants this to happen on his watch. but this isn't anything to do with partisanship. he wouldn't want it to happen because he's a human being, and the head of the US, not because he's a republican for gods sake.

-koji K.

[edit on 17-7-2004 by koji_K]


reply posted on 17-7-2004 @ 11:17 AM by cyberpilot
Originally posted by rwsdakota
Cruise missle specs:
Length: 18 feet 3 inches (5.56 meters); with booster: 20 feet 6 inches (6.25 meters)
Weight: 2,900 pounds (1,315.44 kg); 3,500 pounds (1,587.6 kg) with booster
Diameter: 20.4 inches (51.81 cm)
Wing Span: 8 feet 9 inches (2.67 meters)
Speed: Subsonic - about 550 mph (880 km/h)



757 specs:

Overall length: 155 feet, 3 inches
Wingspan: 124 feet, 10 inches
Maximum speed: 402 mph
Weight: 126,250 lbs. (empty)
Fuel capacity: 9,370 gallons


Do you seriously think people driving on the highway, people walking around the area of the pentagon, mistaken a 20ft cruise missle from a 155ft plane painted up as a plane?

Also, pics and video from a pentagon guardhouse clearly show.. A PLANE A PLANE!!



Al la plane!



As for the damage to the pentagon being so small (in comparison to what it should be).. watch the videos (try google.com) you'll clearly see the plane hits the ground slightly before hitting the pentagon...


guardian.250free.com...

[edit on 17-7-2004 by rwsdakota]

[edit on 17-7-2004 by rwsdakota]


Way above on that one rws, brief, well rounded and to the point. ^5


reply posted on 17-7-2004 @ 12:24 PM by roxdog

Especially considering that the heat in the WTC melted supprot beams and the impact from the collapse crushed ten floors into something like four inches.

fe.pennnet.com...
"As things now stand and if they continue in such fashion, the investigation into the World Trade Center fire and collapse will amount to paper- and computer-generated hypotheticals."
-January 4, 2002-Bill Manning, Fire Engineering's editor in chief


reply posted on 17-7-2004 @ 05:28 PM by rwsdakota
I'd also like to post this pic:




And:



These 2 pics (simulations) coupled with the grainy frame-by-frame video.. could you possibly tell me that the plane did not belly down momentarily before it smashed into the pentagon? A plane going that fast, striking the ground before, or possibly at the same time of hitting the building, would surely rip off its wings.. hence the lack thereof of the 5 million conspiracy "wing impacts" websites' claims.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags