It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nohup
I think I read pretty much everything I needed to on the Excerpt's Page 3, where it said, "Written by Richard C. Hoagland."
From there, I can imagine the pages filled with blurry, headache-inducing photos, "imaginative" interpretation of images, unverifiable conjecture and fantasy, and much more.
Well, hey, Hoagland has car payments to make like everybody else, I guess. It's just unfortunate that so many people will consider it all gospel and clog up forums like this one for years to come parroting the stuff.
Originally posted by jojoKnowsBest
If anyone reads Dark Mission or has more information on "Data's Head" I would like to know more about that artifact. On the recent C to C interview I think Richard spoke about how the government got its hands on Data's Head and after a very long time managed to communicate with the robot which taught us about the ancient civilization that created it along with the civilization that was once there.
John Lear thinks there is a breathable atmosphere, vegetation, and mining operation currently going on the moon. Richard believes there are just ruins of an ancient civilization but nobody there now, I don’t know if he thinks there is or ever was an atmosphere. Does anyone else have a different take or opinion?
Hoagland pointed towards lunar images he's labeled as 'The Tower' and 'The Shard,' as the reason why these boxes may have disappeared. 'The Tower,' described as a glass ruin 10-15 miles high, is an artifact of an ancient civilization that was once on the moon, he believes.
Originally posted by nightmare_david
You forgot to say "in my opinion". Not everyone feels the same about Hoagland as you do
Originally posted by EBE154
why haven't we been to the moon for over 30 years now and WHY(!) does the president himself announce in 2004 that we will not return to the moon before 2020 which is an incredibly huge timespan?!
Originally posted by EBE154
i certainly understand your point but can you for example prove that the face on mars is not an artificial construction?
Originally posted by sputniksteve
I am glad you started this thread actually. I ordered the book last week or the week before. I am going to try and pick it up today and I am sure it will be a quick read. I will give my input once I'm done.
I think Mr. Hoagland's theories are amazing. If you have the chance, listen to Richard and Mike Barra on C2C, they did an interview concerning the release of the book this month. It is pretty entertaining, it is really hard to believe that these guys are just out to make a buck. Personally i think they will find something eventually.
***Oh yeah, don't forget that they are presenting their information to the "International Press Corp." later this month also. Not the first time he has done this, but at least it gives a lot more credibility then just going on fringe programs and websites. Know anyone else in the field that has the balls to do what Mr. Hoagland does?
And if you don't understand that basic notion, there's really no point in continuing this discussion.
I am not sure EBE154 if you are familiar with Coast2coastam or not but in case not it is a radio show here. You can listen to the last couple months shows on the Internet. It costs about 7 dollars a month to be a member but it is money well worth it in my opinion. If you do indeed know what I am talking about, and you either have/or will get the membership there I can supply you with the 2 show dates I am speaking of.