U.S. Military Killing 10,000 Iraqis Per Month, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 10:39 AM by wsamplet
reply to post by Rilence



Anyone who does not find this statement disgusting, nauseating, immoral and just plain against everything this site stands for, doesn't deserve to post here, IMO...


You are allowed to post your opinion on ATS. If you can't handle it maybe you should not post here.

I agree all human life is of equal worth, that said there is nothing wrong with supporting the home team.


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 10:40 AM by Rilence
reply to post by wsamplet



That particular poster said 10 million of the away team wasnt worth one of the home team ?

You think that's right, eh ?



reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 10:42 AM by anhinga
Didn't know the Internet was American yo?

Anyway, how about this little
stat?
I know, you're all proud of Rummy for stealing a couple of trillion (!) from you to perform some future theater wars in mid east.

Sure, the price of oil, subprime mortgage 'industry' and middle-class baby bombers robbed of their ss (social, um, security? Not the German Army who has a lot to do w/ those in charge) and a credit debt windfall that will bankrupt American sooner then.... sure, the "home team" -- keep 'rooting' dude/Ms....

I can't wait to hear from these bleeding hearts when the future wars turn to someone a little out of the league of the U.S. -- China. Lockheed sells to whomever has got the loot, right?

Peak oil? True or false. Uh, population sizes? Standing armies? And we're jumping ahead here folks, Russia is a country too and they seem to like the people who speak Farsi . . . . . stay 'tuned' right?

Hey, looks like the DJIA has been down all week, even today, a Friday?! That's unheard of in the U.S. stock scene -- down on a Friday? Impossible. How much, I dunno, only about 200 points or almost 2%, I know, I know -- it ebbs and flows. Sure, it does.

Oh, and THIS tidbit. The G7 wants China to watch its currency, huh? Well, they've been threatened for, I dunno, YEARS to do it -- guess what? They ain't. Look it up.


[edit on 19-10-2007 by anhinga]

[edit on 19-10-2007 by anhinga]


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 10:56 AM by wsamplet
reply to post by Rilence



I think it is important to first establish that no one knows how many Iraqi civilian casualties are actually innocent casualties. My point is that there are more than likely casualties listed as civilian that were actively engaged in trying to kill our soldiers.

I do not like to hear of innocent civilians being killed in this war. I know our military does everything possible to limit civilian casualties, but they do happen.

I do want to see our soldiers kill more bad guys than they kill of our soldiers.


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:03 AM by Rilence
reply to post by wsamplet



Actually, I agree with you wsamplett...Until this thread was derailed by eclipse_solar and the mods still choose to do nothing about this, I was very open to debate the numbers...

IMO 120,000 per year PURE civilian deaths seems to be a stretch...However...Do I believe at least 4 million Iraqis have died since this "War" commenced, damn straight I do...

The reality of the whole situation is the US did what they did thru pure greed, and in the process, they unnecessarily endangered the lives of thousands of troops...

All because of a decade or two of oil...

The WMD thing was proven to be a crock...So why attack Iraq if not to either

A) Give US companies first dibs on Iraqs oil and its infrastructure in particular

or

B) Keep the US growth economy established under the Clinton regime going thru military spending...

I often wonder what mix of the two is the case...


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:15 AM by wsamplet
reply to post by Rilence



I think we agree that the only profitable reason to go to war in Iraqi is the oil and access to the gulf. Historically wars are fought over land and resources, and that land is of strategic importance either militarily or economically.

Could we be there for their oil? It is quite possible. Strategically we need it for our military, our infrastructure and our economy. Whether I agree with invasions for oil or not, the time is coming where with out a steady flow of affordable oil we will be weakened militarily and economically.


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:23 AM by Rilence
reply to post by wsamplet



Yes, it places a strategic wedge in the hear of the middle east...

However. I believe some people have guessed wrong when it comes to stability of energy resources as a result of same...

I mean, for oil prices to stabilise, the US needs to have a decisive "victory" in Iraq in the next few years...

That is for the government of Iraq to take over security of the country whilst allowing US companies to continue their work on Iraqs oil infrastructure...

I cant see that happening scott free...The Chinese particularly are big importers of Iraqi oil, and they would love to have more...

If US companies are running the show, are they going to allow the Chinese to buy more than their fair share, I think not...

They are going to try to route the oil to the US at under the current forward contract price wherever possible...

I mean, the way US wheat farmers got their tits in a knot cos the AWB paid kickbacks to the Iraqis in order to favour Australian wheat...

The subterfuge involved in getting cheap Iraqi oil into the US will pail in comparison to this, yet nobody will say a word...

Things that make you go hmmmm....



reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:25 AM by yahn goodey
reply to post by anhinga



one can only hope that the iraqis that are being killed deserve to die if they are trying to murder our troops and their fellow iraqis because of religious differences or just plainwell criminal intent.the more the crazies die the less our troops should be getting murdered.i hope that by the time our troops are all brought home the only iraqis left are peace loving and sane.


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:32 AM by BlueRaja
Originally posted by anhinga
"...but mere speculation....I am personal sick and tired of people trying to portray are troops as barbarians spraying innocent villages with indiscriminate machine gun fire, killings babies and cutting off heads."

[graphic photos]
Alright, so
THIS didn't happen?

How about THIS ONE? ( site has total cost to date -- $245 BILLION ! )

...and how about THIS one of DU (depleted URANIUM) victims? Which isn't only ruining these people currently, it's in their water, food chain and obviously from this photo - genetics.

Any armchair quarterback response to these?!?

[edit on 19-10-2007 by anhinga]


So your evidence to support the US killing 10,000 innocent Iraqis/month, is pictures of idiots who took humiliating pictures of Iraqis, a site called endthiswar.org(there's certainly no agenda here, they're merely reporting and we decide right?) showing dead Iraqis(of course there's no way to establish who killed them from the pictures), and Iraqis who might have gotten exposed to DU residue? That's quite a stretch don't you think?
Also, do you think that these 10,000 don't have family, friends, coworkers, that might notice their absence(and we're talking each month according to your numbers). Additionally, where are all these bodies? For that many dead, you'd see an awful lot of evidence of artillery, bombs, cannon fire, etc.. Do you think the military is really going around, killing all these people, burying them, rebuilding all the buildings/homes, and policing up all the weapon's residue, so that nobody realizes anything has happened(and doing this every month?) Come on, this is so preposterous an assertion, I can't see how it could possibly be entertained. This is the only explanation for many of the wild assertions made by many-

en.wikipedia.org...


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:38 AM by crwmknapp
reply to post by Copernicus



So then you regard human life more than human freedom? If people with that opinion were in charge during world war two we would all be speaking either Japanese or German. People who put the needs of the many before the needs of the few have ensured yours and my right to live free.


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:44 AM by lee anoma
Reputable researchers have accepted the Lancet study’s results as valid with virtually no dissent. (snip) "the US misadventure in Iraq is responsible [in a little over three years] for setting off the killing of twice as many civilians as Saddam managed to polish off in 25 years."
Voltaire


I'd always suspected the number of Iraqis killed if officially tallied would be staggering. The numbers seem to contradict the goals.

The whole issue of body counting needs to be laid out. Once we determine the number and see the amount of damage we are doing to these people perhaps some of these hardheaded officials will listen to the people when they said we need to get the hell out.

Wishful thinking though since we feel brazen enough to now take on Iran. I wonder sometimes what the hell this administration is thinking...other than about oil profits and no-bid contracts.

This is truly shameful.

Originally posted by Eclipse_Solar
If 10 million Iraqis would die every month it still would not mount up to the death of an American life.


Originally posted by Eclipse_Solar
I didn't know what I wrote I'm just sad over the death of the soldiers, didn't mean it.


No worries, mate.

Personally I don't condemn you for your statement I applaud your honesty. It further confirms my long standing belief that most Americans who support this war and cry "freedom(!)" for all Iraqi's as the reason actually don't give a flying fig-tree about an Iraqi. Most Americans that support this war don't know any and don't plan too. Most of the Arabs/Muslims that were subjected to hate crimes in the aftermath of 9-11 were attacked by self proclaimed patriots and subsequent war supporters.

So what is the deal?

Do those supporting this war care about the Iraqi people, or is that a front to mask support of a different agenda?

I must have missed a meeting.



reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:45 AM by anhinga
I could careless if the stats are "biased" this is a war, right, like you're going to get a 'truth' from one place or another, tell me, what's a 'non-biased' site -- you're not there, what site would you believe and no offense to those that use it -- but Wiki is a government-sponsored program to give you convenient info without looking further, there's plenty of instances where it's known NOT to use that site for fact(s). I could update/edit it and tell you the sky is purple.

Judging from the body count figure from a site that's "credible" there HAS been up to 80,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, I know that's not a big deal to some people around here but on S11, I lived in Manhattan, and yeah it was awful to watch almost 3k die in front of me but I still haven't heard the end of it, sick of hearing about the day, it hasn't been proven who did it and I think it's time to move on from those conspiracies and onto ones like these where there are reporters/researchers who are getting their facts straight in the mid east.

"...and the clown in the flight suit is cracking jokes to the camera crew."


edit: great post, Lee. Yeah, it is about something else, they don't give a hoot about human life seemingly when you got that guy's nonsense which happened and we're hoping someone here does something about it; and the fact that others are hinting that it's about oil and not really having a problem w/ that, check their posts! OF COURSE it's about oil, even Bubble Greenspin said so in his useless book, an ex-General said so, uh, who else? Oh, Putin did too and looka who he stickin' up for. Yeah, Farsi!

[edit on 19-10-2007 by anhinga]


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 11:59 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by yahn goodey



one can only hope that the iraqis that are being killed deserve to die if they are trying to murder our troops and their fellow iraqis because of religious differences or just plainwell criminal intent.



Thanks for the post yahn goodey.

Very few people 'deserve' to die. People die in wars for the benefit and at the behest of their leaders who, for the most part, have political agendas that do not necessarily coincide with the well being or safety of the soldier, his family or his country.

We invaded Iraq because we wanted their oil, we wanted an excuse for partition and we needed a base for our attack on Iran.

Iraqis don't fight American because they hate Americans or our religion. They fight Americans because they want their country back and the Americans out. They did indeed have a serious probelm with Hussein but not near the problem they have now.

Iragis kill Americans because they know that we are really there, not for their benefit, but for the benefit of of Neocon agenda and Israel. (But I repeat myself.)

The religious aspect, Muslim vs. Christian while always contentious has been elevated to a 'worldwide threat of terrorism' which is a total fabrication of the truth. The intent of the fabricatin is to whip up frenzy against Muslims and provide a reason to attack Iraq.

Our military, loyal to our Commander in Chief has been caught in a web of lies and deceipt. They MUST obey the Commander in Chief but most know it is a total sham to justify a neocon political agenda which is outlined above.

the more the crazies die the less our troops should be getting murdered.i hope that by the time our troops are all brought home the only iraqis left are peace loving and sane.


The majority of Iraqis are peace loving and sane. They just want us to get out of their country.

You should know that we are spending of trillions of dollars to allegedly bring 'democracy' to Iraq while we don't even have a 'democracy' at home. At one time we had a Constitutional Republic but today we are one declaration away from a dictatorship.

And don't kid yourselves about any troops ever coming home. Our troops will be in Iraq way past the time the sun turns into an ice cube.

Thanks for your post, it was truly appreciated.


reply posted on 19-10-2007 @ 12:07 PM by Cuhail
Ya know, I've watched this thread just spiral down in depravity and borderline personal shots. The topic was covered a few weeks ago and I believe it got just as heated and volatile as well.

What I have listened to from returning Veterans (I know quite a few, chances are, so do you) is that they are fighting an Army that wears NO uniform. They wear the same clothes as the non-combatants do. So, you are guarding a convoy and 10 Al Queda/Taliban start shooting AKs and RPGs. How do you pick them out from the guy just walking to the store or the mother who is in the wrong place at the wrong time? And there are a hundred innocent people walking by while the enemy combatants USE THIS TACTIC to keep the coalition troops blind to them. And where would you shoot? Well you wouldn't. Because you are at home. At your computer taking tallies from the internet and complaining loudly that they are doing it wrong.
I'm no fan of the war. I am a fan of the soldiers who go to foriegn shores and make sure we, as Americans, wake up tomorrow safe and sound.
I'm NO fan of George Bush and his kind of Politician. But, I think he's manipulated almost as much as we, the public, are.
You can armchair General all ya want, but, it still comes down to (at least now it does) to IRAQ and AFGANISTAN to decide how they want to live. Free to make their country the best they can and prove to us that they don't need us anymore...or as an occupied land under the authority of men with guns. Either ours or the radicals.
In my opinion, this is obvious.

Cuhail
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 32 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags