look, the issue is manyfold, the FDA (and similar alphabet soup organisations) do not appear to be honest after even casual research.
a prime example would be the banning of benign substances like
Tryptophan (click)
or Stevia, while approving tons of synthetic drugs which lead to
more
deaths than you can possibly imagine.
enter Autism and brain damage:
it's (un?)fortunate that animal experiments go a long way towards establishing credibility of many 'kooky' vaccine sceptics,
www.medicalnewstoday.com...
add into the mix the recent problem with a HPV vaccine (Gardasil), which had already knocked more than 300 girls out cold shortly after introduction,
see
www.news-medical.net...
According to NVIC's report, a majority of Gardasil adverse event reports to VAERS involved those who suffered fever, nausea, headache or pain;
14 percent were for syncopal episodes with or without neurological signs; and 8 percent experienced tingling, numbness and loss of sensation, facial
paralysis or Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Although adverse event reports to VAERS do not prove causation, they can provide an early warning sign that a
new vaccine may be causing health problems that could be important. For example, reports to VAERS of bowel blockage (intussusception) in babies
following receipt of Merck's Rota Teq (rotavirus) vaccine prompted the FDA to issue a public warning to doctors and consumers on Feb. 13.
NVIC also found that there were several VAERS reports of HPV infection, genital warts and cervical lesions after Gardasil vaccination. It is
unknown if the girls were infected with HPV before being vaccinated or if Gardasil failed to protect them. One case of HPV infection occurred in a
22-year-old girl who had participated in a Merck Gardasil trial in 2003 when she had shown "strong conversion to all 4 vaccine types" but "tested
positive for high risk HPV" in 2006, according to the VAERS report.*
...
.. and you've got people wondering, obviously. especially the mention of 'neurological signs' will ring a few bells.
one thing is certain, though, givng shots to babies is negligent, at best. contrary to mainstream ideology there
are frequent side effects AND
vaccines aren't foolproof in terms of protection, because nothing is. the downside of the ideological firewall is of course a distinct lack of data
(correct me if i'm wrong), especially trustworthy data... which, in a nutshell, means that you'll no longer die of, say, tetanus, at least
statistically speaking, rather some fancy 'superbug', because you were vaccinated, weren't you?!
statistics, as we know are often used to convince people, for the simple reason that they require enormous effort in the data processing department,
which laymen are unlikely to have - or better yet, were. today's tools make independant compilations viable, therefore breaking the monopoly in cases
where data
can be obtained, somehow.
haloboyle.blogspot.com...
the last resort would of course be to invalidate the results, which is partly justified, because, without peeking at the underlying set of raw data,
there's no way to tell how accurate statistics really are, something which applies to both, professional and improvised samples, though.
PS: posting images for shock value does not make your argument any stronger, the same could be done with pics and videos of autists, both mean nothing
to the discussion at hand, of course. perhaps, boycotting vaccines altogether is a knee-jerk reaction, maybe a more relaxed stance would have been
preferrable, but people have no reason to blindly trust when their personal experience indicates that something is wrong. cases of babies dying after
getting shots, or regressing, all the while screaming at the top of their lungs will be considered anecdotal, as long as noone really bothers to
investigate, but then, these authorities claim to find no evidence that free oxygen (O3, H2O2, etc) is useful at _any_ concentration, mind you,
depsite ample evidence dating back to WW1 to the contrary - for the record, oxygen does not react in pairs, so we all generate free oxygen at all
times.
ah the title should be changed to the "Revolt of the uninformed". 
