Originally posted by interestedalways

Originally posted by catgtr33

These companies are too powerful, they have there own laws, and for the poor victims of their arrogance, well they have their lives stripped from them and have to suffer in silence without being compensated, even when the cost of care for the children they have damaged almost triples.

This sentence really brings the issue home.

I understand that in the patriot act there was a $200,000 cap on judgements for vaccine related lawsuits. That leads me to believe there will be a time that it is established fact that something about the vacination process leads to disease in some children.

If in fact a parent is made to vacinate thier child, yet has to sign a waiver if they are harmed there will no compensation that is hypocritical to say the least. It's like playing russian roulette with your child. What is it called, collateral damage?

You used the term, "suffer in silence", I can only imagine how it would feel to be effected by this and to not even have the closure of a cause. Your family's entire lives are changed by this and no one knows why.

It makes you feel very angry, ignored and frustrated! I am just waiting for the bubble to burst by fool proof conclusive evidence and a rash of won cases, then we will be silent no more! It normally takes it to kick off in the US before we here in the UK can make our move!

A very good doctor friend of mine who I know through my professional work is heavily against mixing different vaccinations together into a single vaccine. In the UK we have what is known as the MMR vaccine (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) which has been reported to cause Autism. This has resulted in a record number of people not having the vaccinations. Earlier this year the effect of that hit when there was a statistically large increase in the number of cases of Measles, particularly amongst University students.

The big problem with mixing, according to my friend, is that the vaccines (being "live" vaccines), interact with each other and cause fundamental changes in each other, so that when the vaccines are finally administered, they are not entirely what was put in the mix in the first place.

The other issue is to do with the immune system. By giving a single vaccine, the body has to deal with one bacteria/virus, and produce anti-bodies against it. By giving three vaccines at the same time however, the body has three viruses/bacteria to deal with, which could potentially overload the nervous system and damage it or result in poor or no immunization.

The only reason they mix vaccines is because it is cheaper and means less paperwork.

[edit on 17-11-2007 by mirageofdeceit]