It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton Would Use Violence Against Iran

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2007 @ 04:39 AM
link   

Hillary Clinton Would Use Violence Against Iran


www.guardian.co.uk


"If Iran does not comply with its own commitments and the will of the international community, all options must remain on the table," Ms Clinton said.
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Oct, 17 2007 @ 04:39 AM
link   
Ms Clinton, a fav reptilian shapeshifter around these parts, went
on to say this, "If Iran is in fact willing to end its nuclear weapons programme, renounce sponsorship of terrorism, support Middle East peace, and play a constructive role in stabilising Iraq, the United States should be prepared to offer Iran a carefully calibrated package of incentives,"

Which basically means the US will attack if you don't surrender your oil wealth and state to us. She was looking more haggard then usual.

www.guardian.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)


Double thread started?!?! Sorry Mods, don't know how that happened. . .

[edit on 17-10-2007 by anhinga]


SR

posted on Oct, 17 2007 @ 04:45 AM
link   
No surprise really Hitlary will follow her masters orders to the letter like a good puppet if she gets in. Anything to keep the good old wartime economy plans implemented eh
.

"carefully calibrated package of incentives," How generous sell your soul for some candy!!! great....


[edit on 17-10-2007 by SR]



posted on Oct, 17 2007 @ 09:09 AM
link   
Hillary would never use force against Iran, or any other country for that matter. She is just as much as a pacifist as the other Dem's are. Much like Obama who claims he would completely remove our nuclear weapons as a deterrent to other countries. Hillary says whatever she thinks the public wants to hear. Her opinions and ideas change every time the wind blows.

And even if she did want to attack Iran, it wouldn't be for their "oil wealth". The entire country only has one refinery. Which if you asked me, should have been destroyed when we found out they were aiding the terrorists who were killing American soldiers.



posted on Oct, 19 2007 @ 02:30 AM
link   
reply to post by anhinga
 


hmm to me that actually reads as, If you decide to grow up and be benifical to the global community you will be rewarded, and if you continue to be a detriment you will continue to be treated as such.



posted on Oct, 19 2007 @ 08:52 AM
link   
What she is really doing here is attempting to pander to both side of the political argument. It's her favorite thing to do as she will claim the values and ideas of whatever group of people she is addressing. She is wanting it to seem as though she will not start wars like the current adminastration, and also that she will be willing to use our military if need be. Instead of standing by her original pro-war position, or standing by here newly discovered anti-war position; she is trying to cater to everyone.

This woman is such a phony. I don't know how anyone can buy her garbage.



posted on Oct, 20 2007 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a phony that will do or say anything...sounds like she's perfect for the job....



posted on Oct, 22 2007 @ 07:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by dave7
a phony that will do or say anything...sounds like she's perfect for the job....


You're right.

And that continued sense of sarcasm is just the help this country needs to get back on the right track.

Thanks for the help.



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by anhinga
 


Does anyone else get the feeling that the reason why we are pulling out of Iraq by the end of this year, is because they are "baiting" Iran? They are warning Iran to stay out of Iraq and at the same time we are pulling out? That's like a dog gnawing on some meat and then stepping back, just begging the cat to step up and take a bite.



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 07:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phenomium
reply to post by anhinga
 


Does anyone else get the feeling that the reason why we are pulling out of Iraq by the end of this year, is because they are "baiting" Iran? They are warning Iran to stay out of Iraq and at the same time we are pulling out? That's like a dog gnawing on some meat and then stepping back, just begging the cat to step up and take a bite.


It will be interesting to watch. Since Hussein's demise, the two countries have actually made great strides in agreement. Iraq might just "invite" them in. Iran has an embassy in Iraq. As of 2010, the two countries have signed over 100 economic and cooperation agreements. Who are we to tell Iran to stay out if Iraq wants to continue and develop political relatons with them???




top topics



 
0

log in

join