It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bout Time
Anti-Abortionist Calls for Violence, Says It Is Religious Duty
"As cream rising to the top of the milk,
"One might ask what do the Muslims and Christians have in common? The Holy Bible and Koran both condemn baby murder and homosexuality as capital crimes," he wrote. "The radical elements of both religions are willing to do more than talk to resist the societal promotion of both these capital crimes.
Originally posted by intelgurl
From what I have read, such activity is in direct conflict with the words of the "Christ" in the bible for whom the faith is named.
Therefore, it is reasonable that instead of christian terrorists, these should more accurately be labeled "misguided fools who think they are christians"...
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by intelgurl
From what I have read, such activity is in direct conflict with the words of the "Christ" in the bible for whom the faith is named.
Therefore, it is reasonable that instead of christian terrorists, these should more accurately be labeled "misguided fools who think they are christians"...
I don't believe the Qur'an advocates it either...but there they are.
Originally posted by intelgurl
From what I have read, such activity is in direct conflict with the words of the "Christ" in the bible for whom the faith is named.
Therefore, it is reasonable that instead of christian terrorists, these should more accurately be labeled "misguided fools who think they are christians"...
Originally posted by intelgurl
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by intelgurl
From what I have read, such activity is in direct conflict with the words of the "Christ" in the bible for whom the faith is named.
Therefore, it is reasonable that instead of christian terrorists, these should more accurately be labeled "misguided fools who think they are christians"...
I don't believe the Qur'an advocates it either...but there they are.
yeah, that just goes to show you whatever the worldview is, there will be misguided fools who take it way beyond an extreme.
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by intelgurl
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by intelgurl
From what I have read, such activity is in direct conflict with the words of the "Christ" in the bible for whom the faith is named.
Therefore, it is reasonable that instead of christian terrorists, these should more accurately be labeled "misguided fools who think they are christians"...
I don't believe the Qur'an advocates it either...but there they are.
yeah, that just goes to show you whatever the worldview is, there will be misguided fools who take it way beyond an extreme.
Yep to me it's so sad that they use religion for "a cause" to kill people..if they wanna make a statement, they should do what the Buddisht monks do....
Gas, a match, and THEMSELVES no one else.
When was the last time you heard of a "Buddihst Terrorist"
Originally posted by ImAlreadyPsycho
This could have just as easily been posted in the RELIGIOUS CONSPIRACIES forum. I mean, I thought the xians followed those 10 commanment things.
I guess one needs reworded. My vote goes for
Thou shalt not kill, UNLESS you are trying to stop abortion, war, homosexuality or incest.
No wonder I chose to leave xianity.
Originally posted by FourOceans
Oh I don't know about that, there are huge empires created from Buddhism so i don't see a "Buddhist Terrorist" as a stretch
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by FourOceans
Oh I don't know about that, there are huge empires created from Buddhism so i don't see a "Buddhist Terrorist" as a stretch
And which empire would that be?
Originally posted by FourOceans
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by FourOceans
Oh I don't know about that, there are huge empires created from Buddhism so i don't see a "Buddhist Terrorist" as a stretch
And which empire would that be?
Well you mean aside from the LARGE Gupta Empire in India and quite a few notable ones in China?
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by FourOceans
Originally posted by NetStorm
Originally posted by FourOceans
Oh I don't know about that, there are huge empires created from Buddhism so i don't see a "Buddhist Terrorist" as a stretch
And which empire would that be?
Well you mean aside from the LARGE Gupta Empire in India and quite a few notable ones in China?
Oh those...400 AD for the Gupta
and this one (Malay)
www.sabrizain.demon.co.uk...
What I am saying is a Buddhist (true Buddhist) would never resort to killing another person. They would die first without killing someone else.
Originally posted by FourOceans
Originally posted by baked
I disagree!
Sometimes there is a time to fight.
If you come home and find some crack head raping a family member or hurting a child, are you going to use dialog first?
I doubt it very much.
I, personally would paint my walls a new shade of red.
There is some people you can use dialog with and others you have to hurt to get the point across.
BAKED