Originally posted by eyewitness86
There are so many glaring anomalies about the planes and Towers that I was leaning to the no plane side, but how on earth could explosives have pushed those beams INWARDS?
We must be watching different things.
The Twin Tower collapses I saw had the vast majority of their masses (debris) being thrown OUTSIDE of the footprints -- "falling" outwards in all directions moreso than it was falling "down," or certainly "in" (which it was not at all). This is all demonstrable from photos of Ground Zero, unless you think the columns had legs after they landed.
Thus, you really have just what you said you would expect from explosives:
"Out," not "in" or even so much "down." (directions of falling mass, if you represent them as vectors of momentum or etc.)
Originally posted by gormly
three 100% infallible statements thing continues to slap me into reality and I am surprised more of you do not feel the same.
(probably a believers tendency to ignore the obvious)
1. The Bush Administration could not possibly have kept this a secret in any shape or form.
2. The Bush Administration could not possibly have killed all the people they would have needed to kept this a secret in any shape or form.
3. The Bush Administration is too incompetent to have possibly pulled this off in any shape or form.
You say these three "infallible" statements but what is the obvious proof of them?
You are biased into thinking a certain way. I don't think Bush was responsible at all, but neither does Bush control much of anything in the US like so many believe. Try to justify what you're saying to us with logic.
If you want to know what's technically wrong with your reasoning, you can try a "non-sequitur" for a start: none of those reasons have a damned thing to do with physics.
[edit on 3-12-2007 by bsbray11]
