It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Do you believe the CIA/NSA are among us on ATS???

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:22 AM
link   
I'm one of them




posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 05:03 PM
link   
Ah... part of the Toronto CIA, I see.

Interesting.



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by ultra_phoenix
And the FEMA ? Or the DIA ? Or even the NIA ? Nobody's talking about them. The poor guys. They do also a great a job, so don't forget them.


Don't worry guys, we also like you.


UP, I'm with you man, bring em' on!



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Remember hearing about that kid who was in the national guard and he went into a regular chat room and was busted for wanting to give lower classified stuff to al quida people... and it was a regular chatroom.

its that secret agency that monitors all tv, radio, phone, chat stuff.



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 05:38 PM
link   
no doubt..........but that is nothing to fear in anyway......

the internet is NEVER a safe place spywise



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:04 PM
link   
Well, with NSA's Echelon system in place, I'm sure that it probably specifically tracks topics on certain websites. This would probably be one. As to whether or not those working for such agencies are actively checking and/or participating on this site, I'd guess that they would do so only in their free time. I can't imagine someone skimming through topics 24 hours a day working for the CIA, but it's probably all done by computers, software, and namely Echelon.



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:07 PM
link   
oh yes there here
new it the first day
made me paranoid enough to not come back for weeks
you bet they are watching
who do you think created this??????????????????
not worried anymore after rationalizing it
i answer to a higher authority
some things i dont discuss here though
ive got something for there butts

[Edited on 23-2-2004 by watcheroftheskies]



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:09 PM
link   
this site wasnt created by a couple of computer geeks with nothing better to do



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:30 PM
link   
they are here to manipulate the topics
what they are really looking for is something they know is the truth that you will post but you dont have a source to back it up.... the red flags will really go up then
oh by the way your u2u's are not private ...each one of them is read ...go some where else some how if you want to relay something very private....why do you think they created way above top secret? glean more info of possibly more sesitive nature



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:57 PM
link   
Yes - I am here.......................... Watch your step Mr.



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by bios electric

Originally posted by Solarix
i think there are those who would like you to think they are spooks and those who actually are and dont want you to know.

Seeker and Springer have already been mentioned,
but,
what about intelgurl?

she seems to have too much inside type poop.

What is this? a freekin witch hunt?

Intelgurl works for the defense contractor Raytheon, she is not with any government agency dipsh*t.


RAYTHEON! that's even worse than the government. that is one of the government's governments.



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 07:05 PM
link   
In such billybob, has intregurl misinformed anyone on this board with any type of disinformation?

She is a solid poster and member, despite where she may work. At the end of the day though, does it really matter?



regards
seekerof



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 07:14 PM
link   
most likely......y do u ask? (u'd better give me the right answer or my agency will terminate u) crap.....shouldn't have typed that.......



posted on Feb, 23 2004 @ 07:31 PM
link   
This question is too easy, the answer is in the posts.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join