Man dies after tazer incident at Vancouver airport, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 14-10-2007 @ 09:44 PM by porky1981

Man dies after tazer incident at Vancouver airport


www.ctv.ca
RCMP have confirmed they used a Taser on an out-of-control man who died at the Vancouver International Airport early Sunday morning.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 02:53 AM by BitRaiser
reply to post by V Kaminski



You are making several assumptions...

Firstly, just because he was speaking an Easter European language and a flight from Poland had touched down doesn't mean he wasn't Canadian. Maybe he was there to meet someone one the flight?

If the cause of death was a tazer, he should have expired fairly quickly after being hit. The report says he was hit, the continued to fight, was eventually cuffed, then passed out and then later died. This doesn't sound like the effect of an eclectically induced heart attack or embolism.

As for your statement about rather being shot in the foot than being tazered... ah... yeah, that's you. Do you understand how easy it is to die from complications after being shot in the foot? Bone fragments in the blood-stream, shock, uncontrolled fall resulting in cranial damage... not to mention permanent and lasting damage. I have been tazered. Or rather, I tazered myself. Accidentally... while I was constructing a tazer device... I ah... oopsed. "Pain" really isn't the right way to describe the sensation. It's far from pleasant, but it doesn't "hurt" in the traditional sense. The worst part was the lasting feeling that my nuts were attempting to go North for the winter. Other than that, I was fine a few minutes after the zap.

Tazer's aren't 100% safe, and I won't argue that we have seen cases of abuse with them, but if you think it's better to shoot someone in an extremity than to hit 'em with a tazer... well, let's just say I strongly disagree while questioning the reasons for your statment and/or your grip on reality.



reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 09:40 AM by V Kaminski
I think you assumption of meth is... well you seem you have a vested interested in your argument... 'read your stuff before. Are you a tazer PR person? An investor? I really don't trust you. Are you a disinfo agent? Someone who uses a tazer for profession or "sport"?

The radio (CBC 10:00 EST) has just said the Polish citizen (trust me... he was Polish - I have other sources) was tazered... twice. Human - nationality is unimportant. Oops, that must've been an accident? And that batons could have been used but the "use of those is too controversial" - and against policy. Those with an interest other than the defense of a position that advocates killing human beings for expedience is welcome to - sign up with Bit's agenda of ignorance and deception and inveiglement.

Ciao bro. Perhaps one day you might feel different. I doubt that tho'. People are diffucult to educate and resist change. I am willing to actively listen when you have some facts on this specific and particular incident.

You win Bit'. I won't bother with the likes of a pontification such as yours - and yes I have been shot, not in the foot, but in the thigh (femoral artery - lotsa blood) hunting accident. Left thigh - tornequete.

A link to a Globe And Mail article that confirms "tazered-twice",
"Disruptive air traveller dies after taser jolts in Vancouver". Uh, yeah not Canadian... RCMP wouldn't call Interpol otherwise.

Just my opinion but those who act as dynamos promoting this techonolgy are to be considered a danger to cogent and thoughtful public policy... and human life, many pushing an obvious agenda. My agenda is "less dead people" planet-wide 100%. Business-person travelling alone, dead at 40. 100% unneccessary.

Cheers Bit'... you'll never see it coming anyway,

Vic

[edit on 15-10-2007 by V Kaminski]


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 09:53 AM by Boondock78
Originally posted by BitRaiser
It sounds to me like he was suffering from the effects of drugs. Likely Meth, from the description.


man, i LOVE this...

sounds to you like he was suffereing from the effects of a drug...and it was 'probably meth'.....

it happens in every story....every time a cop rocks someone, that someone was 'probably' strung out or drunk or stoned....
you guys just invent this out of nowhere or what?

i think you do....i think you just pull it out of your grape and then hope the story breaks with something to lend credibility to your claims

edit*
www.theglobeandmail.com...

It was not clear yesterday why the man was so agitated, but Sgt. Lemaitre quickly dismissed the possibility of terrorism. "Nothing led us to believe that it was an act of terrorism," he said."At this point ... we believe it was related to the emotions of one individual."


Vancouver lawyer Cameron Ward, who has been following the issue closely for several years, said the gun, which generates a 50,000-volt electrical charge, was introduced in Canada without any independent safety testing. Sixteen people have died in Canada and almost 300 in North America in recent years after they were stunned by a taser, Mr. Ward said


i wonder if al those 316 people were on the meth[/yawn]



[edit on 15-10-2007 by Boondock78]


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 09:58 AM by Boondock78
reply to post by scientist




i agree with you.
i used to 'taze' myself all the time...

i had one that you can buy over the counter. i'd get drunk and my buddies would start in and i'd taze myself all over...no big deal...

that said, those tazers are NOT the same kind the fuzz uses, thats for sure.


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 10:03 AM by Boondock78
reply to post by V Kaminski



100% with you...it's always like this..
if it's not cause he was 'probably on meth' someone will come in and validate the cops casue he was rowdy and if he wasn't he would still be alive blah blah.....

happens EVERY time...

guy is irate. cops bring the heat. guys dies. guy MUST be on drugs..

it's friggin lame....


people can't or won't accept that these tazers are dangerous and that cops are too heavy handed these days.
everyones body is different and depending on where you get hit with the lightning, i could see it doing major damage....


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 03:50 PM by BitRaiser
My comments were in reaction to the early reports.
Yes, it sounded like a drug reaction to me. I might be a little jaded in that direction because I live in the Vancouver area and I see a lot of Meth abuse.

I have a little trouble understanding how any sane individual could have a freak out like the one described in an airport. Yes, I know traveling can be frustrating, and I know the Vancouver Airport can be a total pain, but what kind of idiot throws a wall banging, computer smashing temper tantrum in an airport post 9/11?? Strikes me like something was wrong with this guy.

Before anyone gets all huffy, no, I don't think that he deserved to die regardless of his mental state.

As to my earlier comment about self-tazering... yeah, it was a hell of a zot and it was more than a fraction of a second. Thing is, it happened because I had crushed my trigger in the vice I was using to hold it while I unthinkingly grabbed the leads. Because of the discharge, I couldn't release them. It's a good thing there was only a partial charge in my capacitor. When I said that "pain" wasn't quite the right word for the sensation, I don't mean it didn't hurt (or that the first words out of my mouth weren't "OW #&@^!!"). I meant it didn't feel like being punched in the head, stabbed, burned, or whatever. It was a very unusual sensation that you really have to experience to understand. Anyone who's been zapped will agree.

Finally, I have a challenge:
If you really believe that being shot in the foot is safer than being tazered, let's head out into a field and try it. You can tazer me, I'll shoot you.
Sound like fun?

Tazer's are NOT safe. They aren't considered Safe by the RCMP. They are, however, a viable tool that can help save lives.
The problem isn't so much with the tazers themselves as with the officers that deploy them in the wrong situations. AS with any other form of force, they should be considered a last resort, not a simple way to resolve a difficult situation.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^