The Hologram Theory is dead, page 66

This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum. (rss)

The Hologram Theory is dead << 63 64 65 66 >>

reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 05:38 AM by anti72
yeah, what do we know what ´our NWO-boys´have as their toys? they laugh at us, but the last laugh.. img208.imageshack.us... www.stormingmedia.us... Feasibility of Implementing Near-Field Acoustic Holography at Large Scale Digital Holography www.stormingmedia.us... www.smh.com.au... smh.com.au/articles/2008/05/27/1211654006265.html www.libertythink.com... libertythink.com/2002_12_01_archives.html www.au.af.mil... au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm www.abovetopsecret.com... UNITED STATES AIR FORCE FUTURE WEAPONS PROPOSALS AIR FORCE 2025 STUDY many more... cheers
copyright & usage

reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 03:44 AM by WolfElyts
How could the explosive have been timed so precisely to match up with the image of the hologram to the millisecond, including having the explosives that made the hole from the tail fin go off literally milliseconds after the wings were shown to penetrate the WTCs? Further, and probably more importantly, how could the holograms have been projected to the millimeter to show a plane entering the buildings at the EXACT, PRECISE location that the explosives were set to go off? - There 25 + years advanced in technology from the public. - Precession is , let me say this in bold " Key " for a " PLAN " on this SCALE and Global matter. why someone might ask? It's for there own benefits in either testing out there weaponry, there agenda, or other premeditated plans. How could the explosive have been timed so precisely to match up with the image of the hologram to the millisecond, including having the explosives that made the hole from the tail fin go off literally milliseconds after the wings were shown to penetrate the WTCs? Further, and probably more importantly, how could the holograms have been projected to the millimeter to show a plane entering the buildings at the EXACT, PRECISE location that the explosives were set to go off? - The explosives were rigged in a unique way which looked as if a 767-200 Plane went through it. In reality this is a hoax, a plan well thought out. Pilots such as John Lear and others confirm to me that in all of it's capability/ Theres no way in hell , First of all Inexperienced "hijackers" could ever achieve hitting DEAD center of the WTC with the planes latitude and speed. Technology has and is being exchanged from et's to leaders on the upper levels of this planet for there own use in there own agenda and time.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 12:49 AM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Since this thread ended on a misinformed note, and since No Planer threads are still front and center, bumping this thread is needed. I'm citing myself from about page 2 in which this post alone has all the PHYSICAL PROOF you could ever need to conclude that planes hit the towers... Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss I'd like to make it even more perilous: In addition to Robz examples, I'd like to add to that: 1] How did they manage to 'spit' the monster fireballs out the other side with perfect timing? 2] And launch the 'engine' and related debris out with perfect momentum and angles coinciding with the planes speed and impact angles? Note the smoketrail from the engine: CLICK THIS ONE: www.erichufschmid.net... It shows the shooting engine in high-res! When you add those in with my other argument, which I've posted in multiple threads yet not one single person has been able to answer it (be sure to click the first link): Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss In the first video of interest the cameraman was on W. Broadway, which was right in line with where the the plane debris was ejected from the opposite side of WTC2. At around time 7:00 the impact occurs. You can hear pandemonium and loud noises as if large things are crashing down around him. Then, as he turns back, you can see plane debris that had apparently landed and killed a pedestrian. 911blogger.com... www.lib.utexas.edu... As we've all been covering inother recent threads, other large bits of plane debris were found including a 'still smoking' engine that landed on a street corner not too far from our above cameraman. While I haven't done an advanced analysis on the raw source video presented above, it does seem to debunk the "MIB Flashy Thing" Theory for how they placed the plane debris on the streets, once and for all. www.abovetopsecret.com...[/im] It's case closed. But, if you insist... For those of you claiming only 4 parts were found, here's some more tidbits from none other than Killtown's website, all WTC related: killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... killtown.911review.org... Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods Nothing you’re saying is weakening the hologram theory. It is my understanding that none of the 9-11 films show holograms. Yes, that’s right, the holograms weren’t caught on camera. The images we see are all CGI inserted fakery. I see nothing can shake your faith in No Planes. But since you're obviously right, tell me, how in the world could they prevent every 'rogue' citizen with a video camera from capturing it? Ok, say you're a conspirator: You have to assess how to ensure getting away with your crime: You consider that you might be able to get away with these mumbo jumbo technologies... But there is one problem: If one single civilian just so happened to get a recording showing no plane whatsoever, you're busted. Even a 10 year old would be clever enough to realize that's not the way to go. You're suggesting that every camera and tape produced from that day is faked. Sinc etey're faking all of these tapes, why not fake the tapes of the video cameras at the Pentagon to "show" a plane, thus "proving" that one hit there? Why release tapes that look more like a missile than a Boeing? And, again to the 50th time, why not also produce some fake NTSB/ec reports to put the icing on their fabricated event? No Planes is about as real as Aesop Fables. Ok, I'll be fair, I won't say that it's impossible, however, considering the difficulty in producing the observed effects to 'near' perfection, in conjunction with the decisions they'd have to go thru in consideration of my statement to you above, and so on, I'd say there's a about a 0.002% chance of "No Planes" being what happened.
copyright & usage