It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Uh, CAPT Lear, the 'quote' you attributed to jfj is one that HE pulled down from ULTIMA...I mean the one with the terrible spelling, "creadible" as aopposed to 'credible'...
Originally posted by damoclese
ill try to field this one. IF, and IMHO its a really big IF, there were any preplaced explosives in the buildings they almost certainly used linear shaped charges...
having said all that, is it unreasonable to think that maybe if these engines were still inside the building when it collapsed, maybe just maybe all that falling steel and concrete tore what was left of the engines into little bits of titanium foil? not sure but it seems plausible to me.
Originally posted by johnlear
There are several examples of aircraft debris but nothing the size of what would have been there had an actual plane crashed into the WTC. Somebody photographed an alleged engine that allegedly flew off of Flight 175 when it allegedly hit the south tower.
I know little to nothing about explosives, but they are a central part of the lol-o-gram theory.
Do you know of any way they could have wired explosives to pull the exterior columns inward?
The hologram enthusiasts...
...... have speculated that explosives were planted on the outside of the buildings, somehow disguised, and they made the plane shaped hole in the walls of the wtc. Any ideas on that?
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by jfj123
And it means that Johns aviation background is very creadable.
Maybe, maybe not. Based on his other observations, I find that I cannot take what he says at face value. Unfortunate but true.
Jfj123, I would respectfullly request that you clarify your comment.
You are certainly welcome to your opinion of my aviation credentials and if you believe I may have falsified or otherwise misrepresented my aviation background then that would put in question exactly what you consider facts and evidence.
I just want you to clarify your position so that we can move forward on the Holograph issue. Thanks.
Originally posted by johnlear
Thanks for the post IBS. Yes, explosives were used to make the Wile E. Coyote cartoon cutouts of an alleged airplane crashing into the WTC.
Do you know of any way they could have wired explosives to pull the exterior columns inward?
As I said before, I don't know how they did that but I'm sure that with the technology available to the perps that created 911 it was no big deal.
One of the main issues in pulling of 911 as they did is that the public had to be totally convinced it was Arab hijackers. It was central to the issue to provide an excuse to go Afghanistan and jump start the opium production and invade Iraq to steal their oil.
The main objective of 911 was to turn the United States of America into an "Arab/Muslim Hate Machine" so that we, as a nation, would support all this nonsense in the Middle East.
So whenver you have a PsyOp lke this you have to use you best and newest magic because you don't want very many people speculating or questioining what really happened or about non-existant airplanes or Holographs.
The hologram enthusiasts...
I know of no other individual who supports the the Holograph theory that is a member of ATS.
...... have speculated that explosives were planted on the outside of the buildings, somehow disguised, and they made the plane shaped hole in the walls of the wtc. Any ideas on that?
I am the only Holograph Enthusiast on ATS and I do not support that explosives were placed on the outside of the building. The Wile E. Coyote cartoon cutouts on the WTC towers were probably done by explosives on the inside of the building or with some other technology that I am not familiar with.
To say that the U.S. government either did this by holographic & sound or the U.S government actually was behind slamming the jets into the wtc, is in part based on finding a cfm 56 engine part off a 737 , doesn’t hold water
But I’m sure this argument has been around long before this post here
Oh dear...
If a DEW was used six years ago, why has it NOT been used since? Say, in Afghanistan, or Iraq?
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Oh dear...
If a DEW was used six years ago, why has it NOT been used since? Say, in Afghanistan, or Iraq?
Surely you gest? They use it all the time. Would you like a schedule?
Thanks for your input.
Oh dear...
If a DEW was used six years ago, why has it NOT been used since? Say, in Afghanistan, or Iraq?
This may or may not be the proper forum, but since I have your attention, Capt Lear, could you respond to my questions regarding your challenge to various people flying a B767 simulator to re-create the horrible events of 9/11?