It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Originally posted by seanm
How irrational does one have to be to entertain the thought that those who built the WTC towers from 1966-1971 had the foresight and the vision to plant explosives that would be set off at the exact locations two aircraft not even on the drawing boards at the time would hit so precisely 30 years later?
Yep, because I said the average guy that was working on the construction was the one that planted it.
Nice putting words in my mouth.....again
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by robert z
Back on topic, there is no way that thousands or even hundreds of people would have been needed. How about this scenario...
How about an even simpler scenario. The governemnt let it happen, just like another Pearl Harbor.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Originally posted by seanm
The burden of proof is on you. After all YOU believe it's a conspiracy, not me.
Get back too us when you've got the numbers.
Edit: Ah sorry... Im confused by the way you quote people... maybe you are realizing there was a conspiracy? It seems so in some of your posts. Please clarify.
[edit on 14-10-2007 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by Copernicus
Ok, but watch this documentary. All the evidence in this one is easily verifiable by yourself. We are not as crazy as you may think we are.
9/11 Coincidences
Thanks for watching.
What made me look into the 9/11 thing was actually the crashproof 9/11 passport. This is like a smoking gun to me. Its impossible for a passport to escape undamaged from the pocket of a hijacker that was on a plane that got vaporized in less than a second, and end up undamaged two blocks away undamaged as the (almost) only thing surviving the crash.
[edit on 14-10-2007 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by Copernicus
OK, I just figured that since you wanted evidence of what the truthers are saying, you would be interested in it.
Maybe you are still not ready to accept the horrible truth of 9/11 and I have respect for that.
Peace.
Originally posted by seanm
And I wonder why no one has brought any charges against the government in court yet. Why not?
To impeach the President of the United States, a majority of the United States House of Representatives must agree to pass a resolution that alleges the President committed "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." This impeachment resolution is commonly called an "Article of Impeachment" and spells out in detail the charges against the President. The House of Representatives then exhibits these Articles of Impeachment to the United States Senate since the U.S. Senate has the "sole Power" to "try all impeachments."
If the U.S. Senate, by two-thirds vote, finds the President "guilty" on any Article of Impeachment, then the President is removed from office and the Senate next votes on whether or not to disqualify the ex-President from holding further office under the United States. Although already tried by the Senate, the ex-President is still liable to indictment and trial under regular criminal statues for any federal crimes he may have committed. If the U.S. Senate fails to reach a two-thirds majority for conviction, the President is acquitted and the trial is over.
Originally posted by seanm
Gosh, another one who believes the government let Pearl Harbor happen.
Amazing.
Originally posted by seanm
This is a good example where you can debunk what you believe on your own. It would be a really good exercise for you to spend a few hours to try to educate yourself on airline crashes of all sorts and try to demonstrate why a passport COULD survive.
Originally posted by freight tomsen
Originally posted by seanm
Gosh, another one who believes the government let Pearl Harbor happen.
Amazing.
SeanM and the OP are the same person. The OP claims to "believe" 911 was an inside job but then says it would take thousands to pull off. This is a new disinfo technique I've been watching since the "September Clues" Hologram disinfo died. You claim to be a 911 truther, but then state reasons why you "kinda don't belive the conspiracy isn't possible." So for people looking for the truth, they read about "911 truthers" like this guy who "believe" the conspiracy, but have doubts about who, how, why it happened. I don't "believe" there's a New World Order conspiracy, I KNOW there is, just as all of you who have authentically researched the subject know. SeanM hasn't read a thing (it's not a theory that FDR knew about PH 12 days prior) Get FDR-The Truth About Pearl Harbor, all the documentation is right there for you to blindly deny.
Originally posted by seanm
Dodging? I was make an obvious point. To help you out, I'll repeat the post:
Originally posted by seanm
Now, just how many people do you reckon would have to be both in on it OR know something was not right after the fact IF?
Please be specific with numbers. Don't exclude anyone, ok?
Originally posted by seanm
Is that why you can't tell me? Gosh....
Originally posted by seanm
The burden of proof is on you. After all YOU believe it's a conspiracy, not me.
Get back too us when you've got the numbers.
Originally posted by seanm
Such as no one saw a 757 hit the Pentagon but saw something else or nothing at all - just as is claimed here by other 9/11 Deniers.
Originally posted by seanm
Amazing. So if NO person saw or retrieved 757 parts from the Pentagon, but retrieved something else or nothing at all, they wouldn't wonder why the government, the airlines, the passengers' relatives were saying it was definitely AA 77?
And wouldn't talk about it? Thousands of people would just naturally keep quiet?
Amazing.
You really need to catch up with reality.
Originally posted by seanm
Yup, exactly. And 40 years ago to boot.
Originally posted by seanm
So you didn't know when the WTC towers were built? What DO you know? So far, not much at all.