It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by six
Because the point is that the work there is not illegal. The mass murder of 3000 innocent civilians and police/fire is. That is why. NSA, not illegal. Manhatten project, not illegal and full of spys so also not that secret.
Originally posted by six
And what I am trying to point out is that there is a difference in the secrets being kept. One is legal, the other would be illegal, if it were true. One is for the safety and security of the nation. The other is, well, mass murder on a scale seldom seen. Yes granted that during some black ops, people have been killed, but I would wager that not on the magnitude of 3000+. We would have heard about it.
Originally posted by six
What I ment was it is kind of hard to hide to murder of 3000+ people without anyone finding out.
Edit to add: Just what would the murder of the 3000+ people on 9/11 have to do with national security then? Since you are in the goverment and obviously have alot more access than I do.
Originally posted by six
They are finding mass graves all over eastern Europe. Cant hide those. Cant hide the fact the Saddam gassed 3000+ Kurds. Cant hide the fact that Hitler killed 6 million+ in his gas chambers. 3000 bodies just cant be swept away.
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to post by seanm
seanm
You are clearly a WUM. I have been foolish enough to be taken in by your BS and, as a result, have helped you devalue this forum with your lies.
Originally posted by six
So see it it practically impossible to hide a mass murder of 3000+ people without somebody finding out.
Originally posted by seanm
Originally posted by malcolmdelaney
reply to post by seanm
Your opening statement is totally inaccurate. Several 9/11 truthers including Webster Tarpley and David Ray Griffin have addressed this exact question. The idea that it would take thousand of know participants simply isn't true. All that would be needed would be a handful of knowing partipants in key places.
[edit on 13-10-2007 by seanm]
[edit on 13-10-2007 by seanm]
Originally posted by six
reply to post by ULTIMA1
Now how would I have I idea about that?? Nor do I think you do either. But I do think that ANY black op the resulted in the deaths of 3000 people all at once, would not be a black op for long. Lets play your game. Can you tell me of any unexplained deaths of 3000+ people in one area? Just 3000 people whose family and friends have not heard from them in awhile and did some checking and found a whole town dead. Do you REALLY honestly think that could be kept hidden for long with absolutly no family or friends wondering just what has happened? No media getting wind of something fishy?
Originally posted by six
No ..Not really. In the context that Ultima and I were discussing, 3000 people in one place at one time just cant be hidden from view.
Originally posted by six You asked for examples I gave them to you. All were known within months, if not days.