It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mcguyvermanolo
Where's the complete video-tape from the Hotel across the street? DUH?
Air it ! In it's entirety.
It would be really simple to clarify the question on the Pentagon/Flight 77/911.
Where's the complete video-tape from the Hotel across the street? DUH?
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to post by seanm
You just revealed yourself as not serious. Too bad.
In the absence of photographic evidence investigators know what to do. So do I.
What would you do?
Is this meant to embarass me into silence?
I don't know what I'd do. Now you tell me.
In the absence of any photographic evidence, please show how it's possible to prove that Flight 11 - or, perhaps more accurately, the plane that hit WTC2 - did not have a pod.
Originally posted by jprophet420
2 conspiracies i often cite are
a. pearl harbor
b. the manhattan project
both went off without a hitch, and the manhattan project literally involved 10's of thousands of people. The most of the poeple involved did't even know what they were doing with b. They just took the job and did their part.
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to post by seanm
I'm too lazy to play your games. Either explain how, in the absence of photographic material, you can prove that the plane that struck WTC2 did not have a pod or I'll just assume you cannot.
Originally posted by NegativeBeef
Area 51 is also a good one. How long have the facility been around? How many hundreds of thounsands of people must've worked and been thee? I haven't seen too many people talk.
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to post by seanm
If you had any way of showing how to prove whether or not the plane that hit WTC2 had pods, you'd have given it by now.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Why did the FBI take the 2 cameras from the gas station? (along with the videos)
[edit on 20-10-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by NegativeBeef
Area 51 is also a good one. How long have the facility been around? How many hundreds of thounsands of people must've worked and been thee? I haven't seen too many people talk.
Originally posted by ccaihc
This is basic police work, you take the videos to collect evidence.
Nothing illegal happened at Area 51, if you believe in aliens or whatever the crap, I guess. Unfortunately I don't believe any aliens were ever at Area 51. Area 51 is just a test site for secret government airplanes.
[edit on 20-10-2007 by ccaihc]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by ccaihc
This is basic police work, you take the videos to collect evidence.
Nothing illegal happened at Area 51, if you believe in aliens or whatever the crap, I guess. Unfortunately I don't believe any aliens were ever at Area 51. Area 51 is just a test site for secret government airplanes.
[edit on 20-10-2007 by ccaihc]
You might want to try to read the post a litlte more before posting.
Yes i understand police work, i am a former federal police officer. But the question was why did the FBI remove 2 of the cameras?
Its not the point that anything illegal happened at area 51, the point is thousands of poeple that work there keep quiet about whats going on there. Which is to disprove the idea that people that think thousands of people could not keep a secret.
Originally posted by ccaihc
...but they didn't keep quiet, and the reason that a lot more people have kept quiet is because there is nothing illegal going on there so why would they tell anyone?
They removed the 2 cameras to look at the evidence. What are you asking me? Why they didn't return it?
Originally posted by ccaihc
1. How do you know that people are getting sick and dieing? You just answered your own question.
2. I don't know? I don't know how the FBI works, why does it matter if they took the cameras down after the fact, it's not like more planes flew into the pentagon after they took them down.
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to post by seanm
I have accused you of being a fraud - twice now. You have had the opportunity to humble me and force a retraction by simply substantiating a claim you made. Instead, you hop from foot to foot, trying to pretend you have an answer, when in fact, it appears you have no clue. Are you going to continue to duck and dive? Is this how septics behave when challenged to back-up their claims?
Show me how to prove, without photographic evidence, that the plane that hit WTC2 did not have a pod.
If you do, I will publicly apologise for insulting you.