Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
ok, there are supposed child martyr saints.
Can you give a credible source supporting this? I've heard the myth before about the whole children's blood during the passover, but not that these
children have been credited as saints by the Catholic church.
As for Augustine himself, he is considered one of the founding fathers of the church, and was extremely prolific. In his work, On Christian Doctrine,
he puts forward the notion that scripture should define doctrine rather than tradition or our desires be used to interpret scripture. A lesson very
necessary amidst gnostic corruption of Christianity then and a lesson many today could use as well.
MajorMalfunction, I think you're missing some key foundational bricks in your understanding. You mock him for telling virgins who were raped they did
not sin because it was not their intention to be raped. Yet, here, today, we have Islamic tradition causing families to disown daughters, or even kill
them, because they were raped and therefore defiled. That mentality did not start with Islam, and is not exclusive to Islam. The United States, just
60 years ago, had that mentality, believing a rape victim was not a victim at all. Augustine reassured those who blamed themselves that they were not
to blame for being raped. And you condemn him for that? How...Odd.
Today's "enlightened" view of screw anything that moves as long as it feels good mentality, though it may have somehow worked for you, does not
satisfy, truly satisfy, human needs and passions despite what the media may tell us.
Finally, guilt is not of Christianity, as Martin Luther discovered a while back in a way that liberated the church from works-based salvation that had
started to take over. As Paul wrote in his letter to the church in Rome, in Christ all things are permissible, though not all things are beneficial.
Yet, Christ forgives all, and says that our sin is as far as the east is from the west through His forgiveness -- any guilt in a Christian is self
imposed and false.
So if I understand your post correctly, you condemn a man for being misunderstood and for reassuring rape victims that it was not their fault. Am I
missing something? If so, should I condemn you for that, or try to understand where you're coming from?