Originally posted by wildcat
It is impossible for an abuction victim to proove their story. If you believe in them, then that shows how gullible you are.
What about the cases where there is physical evidence? Yes, there are cases of people with scars, burns, and other 'abnormalities'.
I'm sure you never heard of these cases or dismissed them along with all the hoaxes and made up stories, but that's probably because since your mind
is already made up, you don't even bother to check. But anyway, I'd like to know what are your thoughts on the abduction scenario.
Are all those people making things up? The ones with physical traces - did they scarred and burnt themselves and made up the stories?
Or is the NWO abducting these people, conducting experiments on em and 'brainwashing' them?
In your first post you talk about abductions behind all fabricated, that the NWO 'brainwashed' people. I'd like to know exactly what you mean by
I'm guessing it doesn't involve hypnosis since you have recently stated that:
But hypnosis has been known to cause psuedomemories, so their stories may not be true.
I'm sure the NWO wouldn't use hypnosis to 'implant' the alien abduction scenario into people's minds, since the method is not reliable.
So, how are they doing it, and do you have any evidence of it?
Your alien/ufo stories are phony. There is no hard evidence, it's all stories from people who have no proof to back themselfs up. And there is
no documents that can be verified as authentic.
There are a lot of authentic documents, from CIA
, etc discussing and reporting UFOs. These agencies and Government do seem to take the stories seriously.
Does that prove the point that UFOs are alien spacecraft or that aliens really exist? No it doesn't. However, one thing's for sure - at least it's
a lot more documentation than you have to help your premises.
In fact, on what exactly have you based your claim that the whole alien/abduction/UFO scenario has been fabricated by the so called NWO?
You keep arguing that the 'believers' aren't able to prove anything that is claimed. What have you been able to prove?
Or is this another one of those situations that the 'skeptic' doesn't have to provide any documentation, research or corroboration for their
debunking, but the so called 'believers' do?
ed: link fix
[edit on 13-10-2007 by danx]