posted on Oct, 12 2007 @ 02:40 AM
1) "The ice in Greenalnd and Antartica will take several millenia to melt" - Well, I'd advise the judge to mail their ecology degree back to
whatever bubblegum college they got it from, 'cause West Antarctica and Greenland are currently melting at an unprecedented rate, and polar melting
2) "The loss of snow on Mount Kilimanjaro isn't caused by global warming, but rather by human-caused climate change" - Uhhhh... So the court is
saying that the thing that didn't cause it is exactly what caused it?
3) "Polar bears drowned because of a storm"? The fact that there was a storm in the arctic that could throw an eight-hundred pound bear out to sea
so far that it drowned, is a scarier proposition of global warming than simple lack of ice.
I'm seeing pretty clearly why we have judges preside over legal laws and not science.