posted on Oct, 10 2007 @ 09:42 PM
Great question. But I think to really answer it there needs to be a distinction drawn between Jimmy the Man & Jimmy the President. From my
experience, most Americans I know think Jimmy was a good and likable person, but are almost in universal agreement that he stank as a President.
Fair or not, but the President normally gets way more credit than deserved when things go good, and way too much blame when they go bad. Jimmy's
remembered for high interest rates, rampant inflation, gas lines, and an overall economic malaise.
I think the Democrats probably could've run a cocker spaniel in '76 and won. Ford was pushed into the VP job after the Agnew prosecution and was
the only person to serve as President who had not been elected to either the Presidency or Vice Presidency. After the Nixon years, the country was
definitely in the mood for a change.
Other than the country's overall economic issues, I think the thing that ended up hurting Jimmy the most was his personality. The perception is
he'd probably be a great guy to sit on the porch and drink lemonade with, but not necessarily the guy you want running point on the tough decisions.
And I think that's the issue - the perception that Jimmy just wasn't tough enough.
I think he's a very decent man, but I think Hillary'd mop the floor with him in a bar fight. He might take Edwards, though.